IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v48y2021i8p2133-2150.html

Measuring urban form: Overcoming terminological inconsistencies for a quantitative and comprehensive morphologic analysis of cities

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Fleischmann
  • Ombretta Romice
  • Sergio Porta

Abstract

Unprecedented urbanisation processes characterise the Great Acceleration, urging urban researchers to make sense of data analysis in support of evidence-based and large-scale decision-making. Urban morphologists are no exception since the impact of urban form on fundamental natural and social patterns (equity, prosperity and resource consumption’s efficiency) is now fully acknowledged. However, urban morphology is still far from offering a comprehensive and reliable framework for quantitative analysis. Despite remarkable progress since its emergence in the late 1950s, the discipline still exhibits significant terminological inconsistencies with regards to the definition of the fundamental components of urban form, which prevents the establishment of objective models for measuring it. In this article, we present a study of existing methods for measuring urban form, with a focus on terminological inconsistencies, and propose a systematic and comprehensive framework to classify urban form characters, where ‘urban form character’ stands for a characteristic (or feature) of one kind of urban form that distinguishes it from another kind. In particular, we introduce the Index of Elements that allows for a univocal and non-interpretive description of urban form characters. Based on such Index of Elements , we develop a systematic classification of urban form according to six categories (dimension, shape, spatial distribution, intensity, connectivity and diversity) and three conceptual scales (small, medium, large) based on two definitions of scale (extent and grain). This framework is then applied to identify and organise the urban form characters adopted in available literature to date. The resulting classification of urban form characters reveals clear gaps in existing research, in particular, in relation to the spatial distribution and diversity characters. The proposed framework reduces the current inconsistencies of urban morphology research, paving the way to enhanced methods of urban form systematic and quantitative analysis at a global scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Fleischmann & Ombretta Romice & Sergio Porta, 2021. "Measuring urban form: Overcoming terminological inconsistencies for a quantitative and comprehensive morphologic analysis of cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(8), pages 2133-2150, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:8:p:2133-2150
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808320910444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808320910444
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808320910444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:osf:socarx:bxhrz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Boeing, Geoff, 2018. "Measuring the Complexity of Urban Form and Design," SocArXiv bxhrz, Center for Open Science.
    3. Miguel Serra & Sophia Psarra & Jamie O'Brien, 2018. "Social and Physical Characterization of Urban Contexts: Techniques and Methods for Quantification, Classification and Purposive Sampling," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 58-74.
    4. Song, Yan & Knaap, Gerrit-Jan, 2003. "New urbanism and housing values: a disaggregate assessment," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 218-238, September.
    5. Geoffrey CARUSO & Mohamed HILAL & Isabelle THOMAS, 2017. "Measuring urban forms from inter-building distances: Combining MST graphs with a local index of spatial association," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2837, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Isabelle Thomas & Pierre Frankhauser & Benoit Frenay & Michel Verleysen, 2010. "Clustering Patterns of Urban Built-up Areas with Curves of Fractal Scaling Behaviour," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 37(5), pages 942-954, October.
    7. Agryzkov, Taras & Tortosa, Leandro & Vicent, Jose F., 2018. "An algorithm to compute data diversity index in spatial networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 63-75.
    8. Miguel Serra & Sophia Psarra & Jamie O'Brien, 2018. "Social and Physical Characterization of Urban Contexts: Techniques and Methods for Quantification, Classification and Purposive Sampling," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 58-74.
    9. Poh-Chin Lai & Si Chen & Chien-Tat Low & Ester Cerin & Robert Stimson & Pui Yun Paulina Wong, 2018. "Neighborhood Variation of Sustainable Urban Morphological Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedetti, Juliette & Bouissou, Stéphane & Emsellem, Karine, 2025. "Characterization of agricultural spaces engaged in proximity-based alternative food networks: The southeastern France case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Hiroyuki Usui, 2024. "Relative spatial variability in building heights and its spatial association: Application for the spatial clustering of harmonious and inharmonious building heights in Tokyo," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(4), pages 987-1002, May.
    3. Martin Fleischmann & Alessandra Feliciotti & Ombretta Romice & Sergio Porta, 2022. "Methodological foundation of a numerical taxonomy of urban form," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(4), pages 1283-1299, May.
    4. Fatemeh Jahanmiri & Dawn Cassandra Parker, 2022. "An Overview of Fractal Geometry Applied to Urban Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Kevin Credit & Elizabeth Mack, 2019. "Place-making and performance: The impact of walkable built environments on business performance in Phoenix and Boston," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 264-285, February.
    6. Hans R.A. Koster & Jan Rouwendal, 2012. "The Impact Of Mixed Land Use On Residential Property Values," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 733-761, December.
    7. Ziyu Liu & Yacheng Song, 2025. "Unsupervised Plot Morphology Classification via Graph Attention Networks: Evidence from Nanjing’s Walled City," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-30, July.
    8. Paul Cheshire, 2008. "Reflections on the nature and policy implications of planning restrictions on housing supply. Discussion of 'Planning policy, planning practice, and housing supply' by Kate Barker," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 50-58, spring.
    9. Chang-Deok Kang, 2019. "Effects of spatial access to neighborhood land-use density on housing prices: Evidence from a multilevel hedonic analysis in Seoul, South Korea," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(4), pages 603-625, May.
    10. Qing Shen & Simin Xu & Jiang Lin, 2018. "Effects of bus transit-oriented development (BTOD) on single-family property value in Seattle metropolitan area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 2960-2979, October.
    11. Yanguang Chen & Jiejing Wang, 2016. "Describing Urban Evolution with the Fractal Parameters Based on Area‐Perimeter Allometry," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2016(1).
    12. Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Sinning, Mathias G., 2011. "Neighborhood diversity and the appreciation of native- and immigrant-owned homes," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 214-226, May.
    13. Eric Fesselmeyer & Haoming Liu & Louisa Poco, 2024. "Within‐development density and housing prices in Singapore," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 406-427, March.
    14. Sedigheh Meimandi Parizi & Mohammad Taleai & Ayyoob Sharifi, 2022. "A GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Analysis Framework to Evaluate Urban Physical Resilience against Earthquakes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-31, April.
    15. François Sémécurbe & Cécile Tannier & Stéphane G. Roux, 2019. "Applying two fractal methods to characterise the local and global deviations from scale invariance of built patterns throughout mainland France," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 271-293, June.
    16. Franz Fuerst & Patrick McAllister & Claudia B Murray, 2011. "Designer Buildings: Estimating the Economic Value of ‘Signature’ Architecture," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(1), pages 166-184, January.
    17. Donadelli, M. & Jüppner, M. & Paradiso, A. & Ghisletti, M., 2020. "Tornado activity, house prices, and stock returns," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    18. Janka Lengyel & Seraphim Alvanides & Jan Friedrich, 2023. "Modelling the interdependence of spatial scales in urban systems," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 182-197, January.
    19. Cheshire, Paul, 2009. "Urban land markets and policy failures," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30837, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Paul C. Cheshire & Christian A. L. Hilber, 2008. "Office Space Supply Restrictions in Britain: The Political Economy of Market Revenge," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(529), pages 185-221, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:48:y:2021:i:8:p:2133-2150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.