IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v46y2019i5p897-913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating urban accessibility: leveraging open-source data and analytics to overcome existing limitations

Author

Listed:
  • TM Logan
  • TG Williams
  • AJ Nisbet
  • KD Liberman
  • CT Zuo
  • SD Guikema

Abstract

We revisit the standard methodology for evaluating proximity to urban services and recommend enhancements to address existing limitations. Existing approaches often simplify their measure of proximity by using large areal units and by imposing arbitrary distance thresholds. By doing so, these approaches risk overlooking vulnerable, access-poor populations – the very populations that such studies are often trying to identify. These limitations are primarily motivated by computational constraints. However, recent advances in computational power, open data, and open-source analytics permit high-resolution proximity analyses on large scales. Given the impetus for equitable accessibility in our communities, this is of fundamental importance for researchers and practitioners. In this paper, we present an approach that leverages these open source advances to (a) measure proximity using network distance at the building level, (b) estimate population at that level, and (c) present the resulting distributions so vulnerable populations can be identified. Using three cities and modes of transport, we demonstrate how the approach enhances existing measures and identifies service-poor populations where the previous methods fall short. The proximity results could be used alone, or as inputs to access metrics. Our collating of these components into an open source code provides opportunities for researchers and practitioners to explore fine-resolution, city-wide accessibility across multiple cities and the host of questions that follow.

Suggested Citation

  • TM Logan & TG Williams & AJ Nisbet & KD Liberman & CT Zuo & SD Guikema, 2019. "Evaluating urban accessibility: leveraging open-source data and analytics to overcome existing limitations," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(5), pages 897-913, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:46:y:2019:i:5:p:897-913
    DOI: 10.1177/2399808317736528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2399808317736528
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2399808317736528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Currie, Graham, 2010. "Quantifying spatial gaps in public transport supply based on social needs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 31-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Renato Barandier & Milena Bodmer & Izabella Lentino, 2017. "Evidence of the impacts of the national housing programme on the accessibility of the low‐income population in Rio de Janeiro," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 105-118, May.
    2. Cristina López & Rocío Ruíz-Benítez & Carmen Vargas-Machuca, 2019. "On the Environmental and Social Sustainability of Technological Innovations in Urban Bus Transport: The EU Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Jephcote, Calvin & Chen, Haibo & Ropkins, Karl, 2016. "Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle (PPP) in local transport policy," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 58-71.
    4. Song, Yena & Kim, Hyun & Lee, Keumsook & Ahn, Kwangwon, 2018. "Subway network expansion and transit equity: A case study of Gwangju metropolitan area, South Korea," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 148-158.
    5. Carmen Lizarraga & Ciro Jaramillo & Alejandro L. Grindlay, 2011. "Urban development and transport disadvantage: Methodology to evaluate social transport needs in Latin American cities," ERSA conference papers ersa11p936, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Legrain, Alexander & Buliung, Ron & El-Geneidy, Ahmed M., 2016. "Travelling fair: Targeting equitable transit by understanding job location, sectorial concentration, and transit use among low-wage workers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Delbosc, Alexa, 2013. "Household composition and within-household car saturation in Melbourne," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 94-100.
    8. Alla Talal Alsharif, 2020. "Georeferencing of Current Dental Service Locations to Population Census Data: Identification of Underserved Areas in Al Madina, Saudi Arabia," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    9. Apantri Peungnumsai & Hiroyuki Miyazaki & Apichon Witayangkurn & Sohee Minsun Kim, 2020. "A Grid-Based Spatial Analysis for Detecting Supply–Demand Gaps of Public Transports: A Case Study of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-27, December.
    10. Valenzuela-Levi, Nicolás, 2023. "Income inequality and rule-systems within public transport: A study of Medellín (Colombia) and Santiago (Chile)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Koragot Kaeoruean & Santi Phithakkitnukoon & Merkebe Getachew Demissie & Lina Kattan & Carlo Ratti, 2020. "Analysis of demand–supply gaps in public transit systems based on census and GTFS data: a case study of Calgary, Canada," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 483-516, October.
    12. Jomehpour Chahar Aman, Javad & Smith-Colin, Janille, 2020. "Transit Deserts: Equity analysis of public transit accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Liu, Chengliang & Duan, Dezhong, 2020. "Spatial inequality of bus transit dependence on urban streets and its relationships with socioeconomic intensities: A tale of two megacities in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    14. Chen, Zhiwei & Guo, Yujie & Stuart, Amy L. & Zhang, Yu & Li, Xiaopeng, 2019. "Exploring the equity performance of bike-sharing systems with disaggregated data: A story of southern Tampa," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 529-545.
    15. Jorge Gallego Méndez & Lina M. García-Moreno & Jackeline Murillo-Hoyos & Ciro Jaramillo Molina, 2023. "Social Inequality in Popular Neighborhoods: A Pre- and Post-Pandemic Perspective from Joint Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, July.
    16. Zhou, Jiangping & Zhang, Min & Zhu, Pengyu, 2019. "The equity and spatial implications of transit fare," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 309-324.
    17. Karner, Alex, 2018. "Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 24-32.
    18. Jiri Horak & Jan Tesla & David Fojtik & Vit Vozenilek, 2019. "Modelling Public Transport Accessibility with Monte Carlo Stochastic Simulations: A Case Study of Ostrava," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Jinat Jahan & Shima Hamidi, 2019. "A National Study on Transportation Affordability of HUD Housing Assistance Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Kyungtaek Kim & Junghoon Kim, 2020. "The Impact of High-Speed Railways on Unequal Accessibility Based on Ticket Prices in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:46:y:2019:i:5:p:897-913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.