IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v35y2008i1p100-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Site Planning and Guiding Principles of Hi-Tech Parks in China: Shenzhen as a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Chuanglin Fang

    (Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resource Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A Datun Road, An-wai, Beijing, 100101 China)

  • Yichun Xie

    (Department of Geography and Geology, Eastern Michigan University, 205 Strong Hall, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA)

Abstract

Recent institutional changes, marketization, and globalization have combined to bring about rapid economic growth in contemporary China. One of the direct outcomes is the rapid expansion of large cities and the recurring birth of new cities from small towns and rural villages. Clustered construction cranes are popular scenes in many Chinese cities. One of the noticeable city landmarks is the specialized economic development district, such as a hi-tech park, industrial park, commerce park, high-standard apartment complex, and designated port district. Along with the development of these new types of urban blocks, the Chinese policies and practices of urban planning and city design have been dramatically reshaped. This paper, on the basis of our participatory observation of the planning process of the Shenzhen Silicon Peak Software Ecological Park, examines site planning and design of hi-tech parks in China. The paper discusses the seven principles guiding the development of hi-tech parks, and the four implementation strategies directing planning and design practices. It also illustrates the adoption of GIS techniques, the new eco-community planning approach, and the classic Chinese cosmology—harmonious wind and water ( feng shui )—through the case study. The paper concludes with discussion of the changes of Chinese values and practices of urban planning in the context of hi-tech parks in the transitional period.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuanglin Fang & Yichun Xie, 2008. "Site Planning and Guiding Principles of Hi-Tech Parks in China: Shenzhen as a Case Study," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(1), pages 100-121, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:35:y:2008:i:1:p:100-121
    DOI: 10.1068/b32064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b32064
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b32064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fulong Wu, 1997. "Urban restructuring in China’s emerging market economy: towards a framework for analysis," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 640-663, December.
    2. Robert S. Cutler, 1989. "A Survey of High-Technology Transfer Practices in Japan and in the United States," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 19(6), pages 67-77, December.
    3. Moulaert, Frank, 2000. "Globalization and Integrated Area Development in European Cities," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199241132.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    2. Torill Nyseth & Abdelillah Hamdouch, 2019. "The Transformative Power of Social Innovation in Urban Planning and Local Development," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6.
    3. Judith Schicklinski, 2015. "Civil Society Actors as Drivers of Socio-ecological Transition? Green Spaces in European Cities as Laboratories of Social Innovation. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 102," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58259, April.
    4. Jacques Nussbaumer & Frank Moulaert, 2004. "Integrated Area Development and social innovation in European cities," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 249-257, July.
    5. Chengri Ding, 2004. "Urban Spatial Development in the Land Policy Reform Era: Evidence from Beijing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(10), pages 1889-1907, September.
    6. Cornel IONESCU, 2015. "About the conceptualization of social innovation," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(3(604), A), pages 53-62, Autumn.
    7. Edwards-Schachter,Mónica & Wallace,Matthew, 2015. "âShaken, but not stirredâ: six decades defining social innovation," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201504, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    8. Frank Moulaert & Jacques Nussbaumer, 2005. "Defining the Social Economy and its Governance at the Neighbourhood Level: A Methodological Reflection," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2071-2088, October.
    9. Zajda, Katarzyna, 2015. "Wieś jako terytorium innowacyjne," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 3(168).
    10. Eduardo Oliveira, 2014. "Reframing the 'creative city' through tailored and context-sensitive policies," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4-5), pages 598-602, October.
    11. Frank Moulaert & Abid Mehmood, 2010. "Analysing Regional Development and Policy: A Structural-Realist Approach," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 103-118.
    12. Joan Nyagwalla Otieno & Vittorio Bellotto & Lawrence Salaon Esho & Pieter Van den Broeck, 2023. "Conserving the Sacred: Socially Innovative Efforts in the Loita Enaimina Enkiyio Forest in Kenya," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Sebastiano Citroni, 2015. "Civic Events in a Dynamic Local Field. The Role of Participation for Social Innovation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 193-208, April.
    14. Patsy Healey, 2002. "On Creating the 'City' as a Collective Resource," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(10), pages 1777-1792, September.
    15. Edgar Pieterse, 2006. "Building with Ruins and Dreams: Some Thoughts on Realising Integrated Urban Development in South Africa through Crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(2), pages 285-304, February.
    16. Tim Cassiers & Christian Kesteloot, 2012. "Socio-spatial Inequalities and Social Cohesion in European Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1909-1924, July.
    17. Konrad Miciukiewicz & Frank Moulaert & Andreas Novy & Sako Musterd & Jean Hillier, 2012. "Introduction: Problematising Urban Social Cohesion: A Transdisciplinary Endeavour," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1855-1872, July.
    18. Anthony Tchékémian & Guillaume Richard, 2014. "Innovation et gouvernance. La mobilisation des compétences et des ressources territoriales à travers le projet Living Lab "Innovation Santé Urbaine" à Nancy," Post-Print halshs-01668269, HAL.
    19. Daniel You-Ren Yang & Hung-Kai Wang, 2008. "Dilemmas of Local Governance under the Development Zone Fever in China: A Case Study of the Suzhou Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1037-1054, May.
    20. Santiago Eizaguirre & Marc Pradel & Albert Terrones & Xavier Martinez-Celorrio & Marisol García, 2012. "Multilevel Governance and Social Cohesion: Bringing Back Conflict in Citizenship Practices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1999-2016, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:35:y:2008:i:1:p:100-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.