IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v31y2004i4p517-537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Component-Based Approach in the Development of a Knowledge-Based Planning Support System (KBPSS). Part 1: The Architecture of KBPSS

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony G O Yeh
  • Jimmy J Qiao

Abstract

Urban planners need to have a flexible, interactive, and intelligent computer-based tool to support their use of analytical models and to structure their planning process. Existing spatial information systems have not developed appropriate procedures and mechanisms to enable easy construction and manipulation of models within their system environment, and to allow various information resources to be shared by different application systems and platforms. Recent research and development of planning support systems (PSS) provide a range of interesting concepts and frameworks that can be adopted by system developers to design a multifunctional and planning-specific decision support system to meet the multifaceted needs of the planning process. In this paper we aim to go beyond the current approaches of PSS and spatial decision support systems (SDSS) in designing a knowledge-based PSS (KBPSS) that uses the component-based software development (CBSD) approach. We introduce the features of CBSD and its technical advantages in the design of a multifunctional PSS. An architecture of a component-based KBPSS is subsequently proposed which incorporates four essential component systems: MapObjects GIS, Database Manager database management system, ModelObjects model-management system, and KBSAgents knowledge-based system. The first two components are based on proprietary components systems and can be easily adapted into the KBPSS environment. The ModelObjects and KBSAgents components were developed by the authors. Based on these components and their associated information layers, two application subsystems are constructed: a Model and Knowledge Development System and an Intelligent Model Selection System. These application systems can be used to assist users and model developers to build new models or to select predefined models from an existing model library for their problems. In order to implement these functions, we propose and define a number of procedures and techniques for component communication and model and knowledge development.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony G O Yeh & Jimmy J Qiao, 2004. "Component-Based Approach in the Development of a Knowledge-Based Planning Support System (KBPSS). Part 1: The Architecture of KBPSS," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(4), pages 517-537, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:31:y:2004:i:4:p:517-537
    DOI: 10.1068/b2721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b2721
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b2721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Landis, John D., 1994. "The California Urban Futures Model: A New Generation of Metropolitan Simulation Models," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9pb6g3g6, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Paul Longley & Victor Mesev, 1997. "Beyond Analogue Models: Space Filling And Density Measurement Of An Urban Settlement," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(4), pages 409-427, October.
    3. Yee Leung, 1997. "Intelligent Spatial Decision Support Systems," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-642-60714-1, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amnon Frenkel, 2004. "Land-Use Patterns in the Classification of Cities: The Israeli Case," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 31(5), pages 711-730, October.
    2. Lin, Huiyan & Lu, Kang Shou & Espey, Molly & Allen, Jeffery, 2005. "Modeling Urban Sprawl and Land Use Change in a Coastal Area-- A Neural Network Approach," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19364, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Youjung Kim & Galen Newman, 2019. "Climate Change Preparedness: Comparing Future Urban Growth and Flood Risk in Amsterdam and Houston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. John I. Carruthers & Selma Hepp & Gerrit-Jan Knaap & Robert N. Renner, 2012. "The American Way of Land Use," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(3), pages 267-302, July.
    5. Ravulaparthy, Srinath & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2011. "Forecasting with Dynamic Microsimulation: Design, Implementation, and Demonstration," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2x12q5pv, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Michael B. Teitz, 1996. "American Planning in the 1990s: Evolution, Debate and Challenge," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(4-5), pages 649-671, May.
    7. Zimu Jia & Long Chen & Jingjia Chen & Guowei Lyu & Ding Zhou & Ying Long, 2020. "Urban modeling for streets using vector cellular automata: Framework and its application in Beijing," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(8), pages 1418-1439, October.
    8. Weiguo Liu & Karen C Seto, 2008. "Using the ART-MMAP Neural Network to Model and Predict Urban Growth: A Spatiotemporal Data Mining Approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 35(2), pages 296-317, April.
    9. Valentina Ferretti & Silvia Pomarico, 2012. "Integrated sustainability assessments: a spatial multicriteria evaluation for siting a waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 843-867, October.
    10. Li Yin & Brian Muller, 2007. "Residential Location and the Biophysical Environment: Exurban Development Agents in a Heterogeneous Landscape," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(2), pages 279-295, April.
    11. Peter Nijkamp & Gabriella Vindigni, 2000. "Food Security and Agricultural Sustainability - A Comparative Multi-Country Assessment of Critical Success Factors," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-070/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Qing Shen, 2000. "New Telecommunications and Residential Location Flexibility," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(8), pages 1445-1463, August.
    13. Harvey J Miller, 2005. "Necessary Space—Time Conditions for Human Interaction," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(3), pages 381-401, June.
    14. R E Klosterman, 1999. "The What If? Collaborative Planning Support System," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 26(3), pages 393-408, June.
    15. Jian Feng & Yanguang Chen, 2021. "Modeling Urban Growth and Socio-Spatial Dynamics of Hangzhou, China: 1964–2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    16. Still, B. G. & May, A. D. & Bristow, A. L., 1999. "The assessment of transport impacts on land use: practical uses in strategic planning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 83-98, April.
    17. Tschangho John Kim & Jinsoo You & Seung-kwan Lee, 1998. "An integrated urban systems model with GIS," ERSA conference papers ersa98p374, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Michael Wegener & Franz Fuerst, 2004. "Land-Use Transport Interaction: State of the Art," Urban/Regional 0409005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Peter Nijkamp, 2000. "Advances in Comparative Assessment Research in the Space-Economy," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Aura Reggiani (ed.), Spatial Economic Science, chapter 8, pages 127-148, Springer.
    20. Luis E Fernandez & Daniel G Brown & Robert W Marans & Joan I Nassauer, 2005. "Characterizing Location Preferences in an Exurban Population: Implications for Agent-Based Modeling," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 32(6), pages 799-820, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:31:y:2004:i:4:p:517-537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.