IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v58y2026i1p38-58.html

Geopolitical ecologies of cloud capitalism: Territorial restructuring and the making of national computing power in the U.S. and China

Author

Listed:
  • Justin Kollar

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA)

  • Andrew Stokols

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA)

Abstract

As computing power becomes central to geopolitical rivalry, cloud infrastructure is increasingly framed as critical to national security, economic resilience and technological sovereignty. Current debates often focus on global competition – especially between the U.S. and China – highlighting strategic investments, export controls and infrastructure diplomacy abroad. Yet far less attention has been paid to the domestic territorial transformations that make such geopolitical projection possible. This paper argues that national strategies for AI and cloud dominance depend on the reorganization of land, energy and regulatory systems to sustain large-scale computation. Using a geopolitical ecology framework, we examine how the U.S. and China build national computing power as a strategic economic and military resource. In the U.S., cloud firms operate as state-aligned actors, drawing on fragmented regulatory authority, public subsidies and national security discourse to expand into rural and peri-urban regions. China pursues a more centralized strategy through its East Data, West Computing initiative, redistributing infrastructure to inland provinces under state-led development goals. Through comparative regional analysis, we show how domestic infrastructural expansion underpins geopolitical rivalry, producing new forms of territorial governance and socio-environmental inequality. Far from immaterial, the cloud is grounded in enclosure, extraction and the spatial foundations of techno-industrial power.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin Kollar & Andrew Stokols, 2026. "Geopolitical ecologies of cloud capitalism: Territorial restructuring and the making of national computing power in the U.S. and China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 58(1), pages 38-58, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:58:y:2026:i:1:p:38-58
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X251369704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X251369704
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X251369704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siying Yang & Shunyu Ma & Jingjing Lu, 2022. "Can government venture capital guidance funds promote urban innovation? Evidence from China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 753-770, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuguang Liu & Jiayi Wang & Yin Long, 2023. "Research into the Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Technological Innovation in China’s Natural Gas Industry from the Perspective of Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    2. Zhang, Yuxin & Zhou, Yaodong, 2025. "The impact of government industrial funds on the innovation of SMEs in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Chen, Baodong & Pan, Qiao & Wu, Shuai, 2024. "Can government guided funds alleviate corporate financing constraints? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Wei Mo & Jiumei Chen & Jing Shi & Yue Long, 2025. "Impact of government funding for science and technology on regional innovation capability: An empirical study on a key economic and technological innovation zone in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    5. Yang, Xiaoran & Ran, Rong & Chen, Yejing & Zhang, Jie, 2024. "Does digital government transformation drive regional green innovation? Evidence from cities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Siying Yang & Fengshuo Liu & Gege Wang & Dawei Feng, 2024. "Intellectual property system and urban green innovation: Evidence from China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), March.
    7. Chen, Shi & Tian, Chao & Dong, Siyuan & Shu, Tianheng & Huang, Yixiong & Huang, Meiying, 2025. "Urbanization and land finance dependence: Insights from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Meitong Lu & Qi Luo & Dawei Feng, 2023. "Ecological innovation effect of broadband network infrastructure: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 1978-1994, June.
    9. Zhanhao Zheng & Yuxuan Liu & Fanzhen Kong & Xicang Zhao, 2024. "Optimizing Urban Technological Innovation through GGFs: A Systemic and Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Chen Hu & Yanan Li & Penghao Ye, 2023. "The Halo Effect of Government: Does State-Owned Capital Promote the Green Innovation of Chinese Private Enterprises?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    11. World Bank Group, 2022. "China Country Climate and Development Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 38136, The World Bank Group.
    12. Zheng Li & Fengshuo Liu & Shuai Mi, 2022. "Can an increase in the minimum wage standard force enterprises to innovate? Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3807-3819, December.
    13. Du, Qunyang & Li, Zhongyuan & Du, Min & Yang, Tianle, 2024. "Government venture capital and innovation performance in alternative energy production: The moderating role of environmental regulation and capital market activity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:58:y:2026:i:1:p:38-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.