IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v57y2025i8p1206-1222.html

Growing sustainable capitalism: The environmental politics of agri-tech in Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Koh

Abstract

This article examines the nexus of the emergence of the agri-tech ecosystem in Singapore and concerns over climate change. In anticipation of supply chain issues due to unstable weather patterns, the Singaporean government plans to intensify its agriculture sector over the next decade. The Singapore Food Agency (SFA) has set a target – a ‘30 by 30’ initiative – to create a robust, innovative, and sustainable agri-tech industry that will produce 30% of the nation’s nutritional needs locally by 2030. Over the past few years, the state has not only shuttered local farms that hew to conventional farming methods but have also ploughed S$30 million into agri-tech startups that have embraced soilless vertical farming. Investors, too, have been lured by the promise of modern cultivation that purports to grow food in a climate resilient and sustainable way. Drawing on debates centred around ‘green’ capitalism, this article finds that vertical farms often fail to live up to the promise that agri-tech will combat climate change and food insecurity. I suggest that these failures are built into the solutionism of sustainability discourse, as start-ups that are supported by venture capital and state investment funds only need to demonstrate the promise to potentially succeed by articulating aspirational narratives that counter the pitfalls of conventional agriculture. In theorizing why there remains a steady proliferation of agri-tech firms amidst failure, this essay illuminates that what is then being sustained is a form of sustainability capitalism that ultimately does not politically disrupt existing systems of environmental governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Koh, 2025. "Growing sustainable capitalism: The environmental politics of agri-tech in Singapore," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(8), pages 1206-1222, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:57:y:2025:i:8:p:1206-1222
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X251323148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X251323148
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X251323148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Teng, 2020. "Assuring food security in Singapore, a small island state facing COVID-19," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(4), pages 801-804, August.
    2. Julie Guthman & Michaelanne Butler, 2023. "Fixing food with a limited menu: on (digital) solutionism in the agri-food tech sector," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 835-848, September.
    3. Sarah Ruth Sippel, 2023. "Tackling land’s ‘stubborn materiality’: the interplay of imaginaries, data and digital technologies within farmland assetization," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 849-863, September.
    4. Brett Christophers, 2019. "Environmental Beta or How Institutional Investors Think about Climate Change and Fossil Fuel Risk," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(3), pages 754-774, May.
    5. Sarah Ruth Sippel & Moritz Dolinga, 2023. "Constructing agri-food for finance: startups, venture capital and food future imaginaries," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 475-488, June.
    6. Madeleine Fairbairn & Zenia Kish & Julie Guthman, 2022. "Pitching agri-food tech: performativity and non-disruptive disruption in Silicon Valley," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 652-670, September.
    7. Daivi Rodima-Taylor & Malcolm Campbell-Verduyn & Nick Bernards, 2024. "Repoliticizing the technological turn in sustainability governance: Moralities, power, space," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(5), pages 699-707, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julie Guthman & Madeleine Fairbairn, 2024. "Speculating on collapse: Unrealized socioecological fixes of agri-food tech," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(8), pages 2055-2069, November.
    2. Katharina Rock & Jonathan Friedrich & Jana Zscheischler, 2025. "Agricultural startups’ visions of a sustainable agri-food future: a comparative case study in rural and urban Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 2033-2053, September.
    3. Diana Mincytė & Aistė Bartkienė & Renata Bikauskaitė & Ieva Šakelaitė & Pia Piroschka Otte, 2025. "What does it mean to care in industrial agriculture?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 1347-1359, September.
    4. Wong, Christiana & Moghimi, Ali, 2025. "Stakeholder mapping of precision weeding commercialization ecosystem in California," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Kirstine Lund Christiansen, 2025. "Relegitimising the voluntary carbon market: Visions of digital monitoring, reporting and verification," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(8), pages 1190-1205, November.
    6. Mascha Gugganig & Karly Ann Burch & Julie Guthman & Kelly Bronson, 2023. "Contested agri-food futures: Introduction to the Special Issue," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 787-798, September.
    7. Danny Ning Dai & Phoebe Stephens & Zhenzhong Si, 2024. "E-grocery as a new site of financialization? Financial drivers of the rise and fall of China’s E-grocery sector," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(2), pages 471-485, April.
    8. Jeremy Brice & George Cusworth & Jamie Lorimer & Tara Garnett, 2022. "Immaterial animals and financialized forests: Asset manager capitalism, ESG integration and the politics of livestock," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(8), pages 1551-1568, November.
    9. Garrett M. Broad, 2023. "Improving the agri-food biotechnology conversation: bridging science communication with science and technology studies," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 929-938, September.
    10. Savannah Cox, 2022. "Inscriptions of resilience: Bond ratings and the government of climate risk in Greater Miami, Florida," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(2), pages 295-310, March.
    11. Till Fladung & Julia Hoffmann & Mathias Mier & Mustafa Ispa, 2025. "A Taxonomy of the Relevant Actors in the European Energy Transition," ifo Working Paper Series 417, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    12. Sarah Ruth Sippel, 2023. "Tackling land’s ‘stubborn materiality’: the interplay of imaginaries, data and digital technologies within farmland assetization," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 849-863, September.
    13. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Klerkx, Laurens, 2023. "Addressing the politics of mission-oriented agricultural innovation systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    14. Whittaker, Stella & Johnson, Craig & Ranger, Nicola & Pedersen, Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum, 2026. "From grand challenges to bold solutions: Investor perspectives on financing urban climate change adaptation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    15. Johannes Lundberg, 2022. "Agency Theory’s “Truth Regime”: Reading Danish Pension Funds’ Decisions Regarding Shell from the Perspective of Agency Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    16. Soni, Rajat Kumar & Nandan, Tanuj & Sawarn, Ujjawal, 2024. "Investment modeling between energy futures and responsible investment," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    17. Daniela Gabor, 2021. "The Wall Street Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 429-459, May.
    18. Paul Langley & John H Morris, 2020. "Central banks: Climate governors of last resort?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(8), pages 1471-1479, November.
    19. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Pablo Ponce & Muhammad Tanveer & Nathalie Aguirre-Padilla & Haider Mahmood & Syed Adeel Ali Shah, 2021. "Technological Innovation and Circular Economy Practices: Business Strategies to Mitigate the Effects of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Muñoz, Fernando, 2021. "Carbon-intensive industries in Socially Responsible mutual funds' portfolios," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:57:y:2025:i:8:p:1206-1222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.