IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v56y2024i1p288-310.html

Making markets from the data of everyday life

Author

Listed:
  • Sangeetha Chandrashekeran

    (Faculty of Architecture Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia)

  • Svenja Keele

    (Human Geography, 2541Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia)

Abstract

This paper shows how the capture and circulation of data about social lives are enabled through digitalisation and market logics and practices. Drawing on Australia's new Consumer Data Right, a state-led initiative that creates access rights to personal data, we distinguish between market promises and the translation of market models in actually existing markets and regulatory frameworks. ‘Life's work’ is brought to market through promises to fix the problems of essential service markets by harnessing data. We argue that the Consumer Data Right is underpinned by a more ambitious vision to create future markets that transcend individual sectors through aggregation across the economy. These visions are silent on how the data, which cannot be owned and therefore cannot be commoditised, is capitalised. We show the Consumer Data Right's discursive, administrative, regulatory and technical aspects through which the previously hard-to-penetrate spaces of the home and everyday life become enrolled in circuits of value, both present and future. This involves technical standard setting by state agencies for accreditation, consent and approval processes; discourses of trust and calculative devices to promote consumer control; and weak de-identification and deletion requirements that grant data an afterlife beyond the original agreed use. This paper calls for greater attention to the enabling role of the state in digital markets as a counterbalance to the focus on the state's regulatory and constraining role. We argue for a more staged approach to market-making analysis to show how the state lays the market foundations that can then be deepened through practices of intermediation and capitalisation by private firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Sangeetha Chandrashekeran & Svenja Keele, 2024. "Making markets from the data of everyday life," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(1), pages 288-310, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:56:y:2024:i:1:p:288-310
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221083985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X221083985
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X221083985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6cbt691h0h8o9q5rf0apko0pda is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Nigel Thrift, 2014. "The Promise of Urban Informatics: Some Speculations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(6), pages 1263-1266, June.
    3. Kean Birch & Fabian Muniesa, 2020. "Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism," Post-Print halshs-02878684, HAL.
    4. L.J.B. Hayes & Sian Moore, 2017. "Care in a Time of Austerity: the Electronic Monitoring of Homecare Workers’ Time," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 329-344, July.
    5. Brett Christophers, 2014. "Competition, Law, and the Power of (Imagined) Geography: Market Definition and the Emergence of Too-Big-to-Fail Banking in the United States," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 90(4), pages 429-450, October.
    6. Kean Birch & Margaret Chiappetta & Anna Artyushina, 2020. "The problem of innovation in technoscientific capitalism: data rentiership and the policy implications of turning personal digital data into a private asset," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(5), pages 468-487, September.
    7. Fourcade, Marion & Healy, Kieran, 2013. "Classification situations: Life-chances in the neoliberal era," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 559-572.
    8. Martin Dodge & Rob Kitchin, 2005. "Code and the Transduction of Space," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 95(1), pages 162-180, March.
    9. Brett Christophers, 2014. "Competition, Law, and the Power of (Imagined) Geography: Market Definition and the Emergence of Too-Big-to-Fail Banking in the United States," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 90(4), pages 429-450, October.
    10. Fabian Muniesa, 2017. "On the political vernaculars of value creation," Post-Print halshs-01633585, HAL.
    11. Edwards, Lilian & Veale, Michael, 2017. "Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for," LawArchive 97upg_v1, Center for Open Science.
    12. Marion Fourcade & Kieran Healy, 2013. "Classification situations: Life-chances in the neoliberal era," Post-Print hal-03470535, HAL.
    13. Christian Berndt & Manuel Wirth, 2019. "Struggling for the Moral Market: Economic Knowledge, Diverse Markets, and Market Borders," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 95(3), pages 288-309, May.
    14. Edwards, Lilian & Veale, Michael, 2017. "Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for," LawRxiv 97upg, Center for Open Science.
    15. Luis F. Alvarez León, 2018. "Information Policy and the Spatial Constitution of Digital Geographic Information Markets," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 94(3), pages 217-237, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Desiree Fields, 2022. "Automated landlord: Digital technologies and post-crisis financial accumulation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(1), pages 160-181, February.
    2. Shaina Potts, 2024. "Law’s place in economic geography: Time, space, and methods," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(5), pages 1584-1589, August.
    3. Rachel Phillips, 2025. "Discipline all the way down: Law and capital in Shaina Potts’ Judicial Territory," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(6), pages 840-845, September.
    4. Gilbert, Christine & Everett, Jeff & de Castro Casa Nova, Silvia Pereira, 2024. "Patriarchy, capitalism, and accounting: A herstory," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Ejiogu, Amanze & Ambituuni, Ambisisi & Ejiogu, Chibuzo, 2021. "Accounting for accounting’s role in the neoliberalization processes of social housing in England: A Bourdieusian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Volosevici Dana, 2025. "Human Resources and GDPR Compliance: Lessons from Romanian Data Protection Case Law on Workplace Privacy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 4329-4344.
    7. Vargha, Zsuzsanna, 2015. "Note from the editor: Insurance after markets," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 17(1), pages 2-5.
    8. Elliott, Rebecca, 2021. "Insurance and the temporality of climate ethics: accounting for climate change in US flood insurance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107925, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Alicia Eads & Laura Tach & Lauren Griffin, 2023. "Intra-household Financial Inequality, Gender Equality, and Marital Dissolution," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 373-393, June.
    10. van de Kerkhof, Jacob, 2025. "Article 22 Digital Services Act: Building trust with trusted flaggers," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26.
    11. Gianluca Chimenti & Hans Kjellberg, 2022. "Mutable mobiles? Making space for an access-based car sharing market," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(6), pages 1277-1296, September.
    12. repec:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:12:p:547-612 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Renee Tapp & Richard Peiser, 2023. "An antitrust framework for housing," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(3), pages 562-582, May.
    14. Yunus Emre Gür & Mesut Toğaçar & Bilal Solak, 2025. "Integration of CNN Models and Machine Learning Methods in Credit Score Classification: 2D Image Transformation and Feature Extraction," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 65(5), pages 2991-3035, May.
    15. Kracman, Kimberly, 2022. "Code as constitution: The negotiation of a uniform accounting code for U.S. railway corporations and the moral justification of stakeholder claims on wealth," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Kornberger, Martin & Pflueger, Dane & Mouritsen, Jan, 2017. "Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 79-95.
    17. Waitkus, Nora & Savage, Mike & Toft, Maren, 2025. "Wealth and class analysis: exploitation, closure and exclusion," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124534, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Nappert, Pier-Luc & Plante, Maude, 2023. "The assetization of baseball players: Instrumentalizing promise with signing bonuses and human capital contracts," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. Siler, Kyle & Larivière, Vincent, 2022. "Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    20. Baker, Darren T & Brewis, Deborah N, 2020. "The melancholic subject: A study of self-blame as a gendered and neoliberal psychic response to loss of the ‘perfect worker’," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    21. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/4ff88coju39nk8b11b5ghfc1ff is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Dean Curran & Alan Smart, 2021. "Data-driven governance, smart urbanism and risk-class inequalities: Security and social credit in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 487-506, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:56:y:2024:i:1:p:288-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.