IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v54y2022i8p1569-1585.html

The blockchain challenge for Sweden's housing and mortgage markets

Author

Listed:
  • Anetta Proskurovska

    (Department of Urban Development and Mobility, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER), Luxembourg; Department of Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg)

  • Sabine Dörry

    (Department of Urban Development and Mobility, 502055Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER), Luxembourg)

Abstract

This paper investigates how blockchain technology may alter the defining mechanisms of residential real estate transactions in Sweden. It departs from the assumption that blockchain applications do not merely change complex socio-economic, organisational and governance arrangements of mature housing and mortgage markets. Rather, they may trigger resistance among incumbents in the current organisational model, which will drive incremental change. This analysis shows that housing transactions in Sweden are long and complex endeavours, underpinned by exclusivity, uncertainty and information inequalities. A public-private consortium led by Lantmäteriet – a Swedish government agency – has pioneered the use of blockchain technology for the conveyance of a house to address these deficiencies. This project has not moved beyond the proof-of-concept phase, while the socio-technical organisation of transactions has evolved. Insights from institutional and evolutionary approaches help conceptualise how technologically induced and qualitatively different structures and functional effects may change the way housing and mortgage markets will work, thereby highlighting both disruptive potentialities and limitations of blockchain applications for the legacy design underpinning the current Swedish housing transaction system. Following a forensic empirical approach, this paper dissects the organisational architecture, key practices and the linked network of actor groups running Sweden's property and mortgage markets. Results illustrate that understanding concrete blockchain-induced changes and their unintended consequences requires closer scholarly attention at the scale of actor networks, the types of knowledge and technologies, and the micro-geographies in which they are embedded. Such in-depth understanding enables better-informed assessments of the blockchain challenge for complex housing and mortgage markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Anetta Proskurovska & Sabine Dörry, 2022. "The blockchain challenge for Sweden's housing and mortgage markets," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 54(8), pages 1569-1585, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:54:y:2022:i:8:p:1569-1585
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221116896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X221116896
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X221116896?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Ashton & Brett Christophers, 2018. "Remaking Mortgage Markets by Remaking Mortgages: U.S. Housing Finance after the Crisis," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 94(3), pages 238-258, May.
    2. Gozman, Daniel & Liebenau, Jonathan & Aste, Tomaso, 2020. "A case study of using blockchain technology in regulatory technology," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105057, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Hull, Isaiah, 2017. "Amortization requirements and household indebtedness: An application to Swedish-style mortgages," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 72-88.
    4. Bennett, Rohan Mark & Pickering, M. & Sargent, J., 2019. "Transformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global review of the uptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big data analytics on the land administration sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 435-448.
    5. Jürgen Essletzbichler, 2009. "Evolutionary Economic Geography, Institutions, and Political Economy," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(2), pages 159-165, April.
    6. Geels, Frank W., 2002. "Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(8-9), pages 1257-1274, December.
    7. Mark J. Garmaise, 2004. "Confronting Information Asymmetries: Evidence from Real Estate Markets," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 405-437.
    8. Jürgen Essletzbichler, 2009. "Evolutionary Economic Geography, Institutions, and Political Economy," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 85(2), pages 159-165, April.
    9. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 16, pages 267-297, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Husz, Orsi, 2018. "Bank Identity: Banks, ID Cards, and the Emergence of a Financial Identification Society in Sweden," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 391-429, June.
    11. Arrunada, Benito & Garoupa, Nuno, 2005. "The Choice of Titling System in Land," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(2), pages 709-727, October.
    12. Rohan Bennett & Todd Miller & Mark Pickering & Al-Karim Kara, 2021. "Hybrid Approaches for Smart Contracts in Land Administration: Lessons from Three Blockchain Proofs-of-Concept," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Timothy Blackwell & Sebastian Kohl, 2018. "The origins of national housing finance systems: a comparative investigation into historical variations in mortgage finance regimes," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 49-74, January.
    14. Ash Amin, 2001. "Moving on: Institutionalism in Economic Geography," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(7), pages 1237-1241, July.
    15. Hugo Pieter Wouda & Raymond Opdenakker, 2019. "Blockchain technology in commercial real estate transactions," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(6), pages 570-579, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghulam Mustafa & Muhammad Hamza Amjad, 2025. "Transforming Real Estate in Pakistan through Blockchain: An Agent-Based Simulations Study," PIDE-Working Papers 2025:12, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    2. Robert & Claudia Klaerding, 2012. "Theoretical advancement in economic geography by engaged pluralism," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1202, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2012.
    3. PROSKUROVSKA Anetta & DÖRRY Sabine, 2018. "Is a Blockchain-based conveyance system the next step in the financialisation of housing? The case of Sweden," LISER Working Paper Series 2018-17, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    4. Hansen , Teis & Coenen , Lars, 2013. "The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: A Literature Review," Papers in Innovation Studies 2013/39, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    5. Duygu Buyukyazici & Olivier Brossard & Ron Boschma, 2025. "Circular Economy Transition of European Regions: The Role of Regulative, Normative, and Cultural-Cognitive Institutions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2513, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised May 2025.
    6. Cahoon, Stephen & Pateman, Hilary & Chen, Shu-Ling, 2013. "Regional port authorities: leading players in innovation networks?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 66-75.
    7. Asheim, Bjørn & M. Bugge, Markus & Coenen, Lars & Herstad, Sverre, 2013. "What Does Evolutionary Economic Geography Bring To The Policy Table? Reconceptualising regional innovation systems," Papers in Innovation Studies 2013/5, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    8. Rohan Mark Bennett & Eva-Maria Unger & Christiaan Lemmen & Paula Dijkstra, 2021. "Land Administration Maintenance: A Review of the Persistent Problem and Emerging Fit-for-Purpose Solutions," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Sebastián Baeza-González & Natsuki Kamakura, 2025. "A methodological framework for tracing cluster life cycles: emerging hot spot analysis in evolutionary economic geography," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 629-654, September.
    10. Maximilian Benner, 2023. "Making spatial evolution work for all? A framework for inclusive path development," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 445-462.
    11. Xiang Luo & Xinhai Lu & Zuo Zhang & Yue Pan, 2020. "Regional differences and rural public expenditure cyclicality: evidence from transitory and persistent shocks in China," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(2), pages 281-318, October.
    12. GRIES, Thomas & PALNAU, Irene, 2016. "Distress Beyond Poverty: Spatial Patterns And Geographic Aspects Of Vulnerability In Brazil," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 16(2), pages 53-70.
    13. Saari, Anniina & Vimpari, Jussi & Junnila, Seppo, 2022. "Blockchain in real estate: Recent developments and empirical applications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Jon Barrutia & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, 2018. "Towards an epigenetic understanding of evolutionary economics and evolutionary economic geography," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 213-241, December.
    15. Gernot Grabher, 2009. "Yet Another Turn? The Evolutionary Project in Economic Geography," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 85(2), pages 119-127, April.
    16. Paola M. A. Paniccia & Luna Leoni & Silvia Baiocco, 2017. "Interpreting Sustainability through Co-Evolution: Evidence from Religious Accommodations in Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Jürgen Essletzbichler & Manuel Scholz-Wäckerle & Lena Gerdes & Hans-Peter Wieland & Christian Dorninger, 2023. "Geographical evolutionary political economy: linking local evolution with uneven and combined development," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 543-560.
    18. Ronald V. Kalafsky, 2016. "Examining the Global Machine Tool Industry: Transitions or Continuity?," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 138-156, June.
    19. Andy Pike & Kean Birch & Andrew Cumbers & Danny MacKinnon & Robert McMaster, 2009. "A Geographical Political Economy of Evolution in Economic Geography," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 85(2), pages 175-182, April.
    20. Essletzbichler Jürgen, 2012. "Generalized Darwinism, group selection and evolutionary economic geography," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 56(1-2), pages 129-146, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:54:y:2022:i:8:p:1569-1585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.