IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v39y2007i2p260-282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecologies and Economies of Action—Sustainability, Calculations, and other Things

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Hinchliffe

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, England)

  • Matthew B Kearnes

    (Institute for Environment, Philosophy and Public Policy, Furness College, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YG, England)

  • Monica Degen

    (Sociology and Communications, School of Social Sciences and Law, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, England)

  • Sarah Whatmore

    (Oxford University Centre for the Environment (OUCE), University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins Building, South Park Roads, Oxford OX1 3QY, England)

Abstract

In ecological, environmental, and urban-regeneration terms, the participatory turn and the turn to action have been written about at length in both academic and official literatures. From neighbourhood renewal to lay ecologies, people are being ‘given’ all kinds of agency in the making of economy and ecology. Yet relatively little has been said regarding the financial organisation of this new populism, which is often achieved through calculation and audit, and the framing of a return. In this paper we look at the uneasy coalition of civic action and its calculability. It focuses on the funding and running of a British Pakistani and Bangladeshi women's gardening initiative in inner city Birmingham, England. We fuse empirical work with gardeners and funding agencies with theoretical understandings of calculation in order to argue for a mode of organisation that not only includes a responsibility to act but also a responsibility to otherness. Rather than arguing for or against calculation, we describe a more diverse ecology of action and in so doing open arguments for reconfiguring the ways in which sustainable activities are funded.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Hinchliffe & Matthew B Kearnes & Monica Degen & Sarah Whatmore, 2007. "Ecologies and Economies of Action—Sustainability, Calculations, and other Things," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(2), pages 260-282, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:2:p:260-282
    DOI: 10.1068/a38110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a38110
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a38110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Hall & Paul Hickman, 2002. "Neighbourhood Renewal and Urban Policy: A Comparison of New Approaches in England and France," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(6), pages 691-696.
    2. Carole Johnson & Stephen P. Osborne, 2003. "Local Strategic Partnerships, Neighbourhood Renewal, and the Limits to Co-governance," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 147-154, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Amore & C Michael Hall & John Jenkins, 2017. "They never said ‘Come here and let's talk about it’: Exclusion and non-decision-making in the rebuild of Christchurch, New Zealand," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(7), pages 617-639, November.
    2. Simeng Li & Zhimin Liu & Chao Ye, 2022. "Community Renewal under Multi-Stakeholder Co-Governance: A Case Study of Shanghai’s Inner City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Chau-kiu Cheung & Kwan-kwok Leung, 2012. "Social Mitigation of the Impact of Urban Renewal on Residents’ Morale," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 523-543, May.
    4. Allan Cochrane & David Etherington, 2007. "Managing Local Labour Markets and Making up New Spaces of Welfare," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(12), pages 2958-2974, December.
    5. Zhilin Liu & Sainan Lin & Tingting Lu & Yue Shen & Sisi Liang, 2023. "Towards a constructed order of co-governance: Understanding the state–society dynamics of neighbourhood collaborative responses to COVID-19 in urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(9), pages 1730-1749, July.
    6. Paul Lawless, 2004. "Locating and Explaining Area-Based Urban Initiatives: New Deal for Communities in England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 22(3), pages 383-399, June.
    7. Wenzhen Huang & Linhui Hu & Yalong Xing, 2022. "Sustainable Renewal Strategies for Older Communities from the Perspective of Living Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    8. Scott, James K. & Fannin, James Matthew, 2007. "Community Decision Support and the Role of the Public in Regional Policy Analysis," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 37(2), pages 1-13.
    9. Oto Potluka & Judit Kalman & Ida Musiałkowska & Piotr Idczak, 2017. "Non-profit leadership at local level: Reflections from Central and Eastern Europe," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(4), pages 297-315, June.
    10. Angela Hull, 2006. "Facilitating Structures for Neighbourhood Regeneration in the UK: The Contribution of the Housing Action Trusts," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(12), pages 2317-2350, November.
    11. Trettin, Lutz & Neumann, Uwe & Welter, Friederike, 2011. "Supporting entrepreneurship in an urban neighbourhood context: A review of German experiences," JIBS Working Papers 2011-8, Jönköping International Business School.
    12. Aveling, Emma-Louise & Martin, Graham, 2013. "Realising the transformative potential of healthcare partnerships: Insights from divergent literatures and contrasting cases in high- and low-income country contexts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 74-82.
    13. Jonathan S. Davies, 2007. "The Limits of Partnership: An Exit‐Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(4), pages 779-800, December.
    14. Lewis, Jenny M. & Baeza, Juan I. & Alexander, Damon, 2008. "Partnerships in primary care in Australia: Network structure, dynamics and sustainability," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 280-291, July.
    15. Rowland Atkinson, 2008. "Commentary: Gentrification, Segregation and the Vocabulary of Affluent Residential Choice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2626-2636, November.
    16. Nick Bailey & Madeleine Pill, 2011. "The Continuing Popularity of the Neighbourhood and Neighbourhood Governance in the Transition from the ‘Big State’ to the ‘Big Society’ Paradigm," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 927-942, October.
    17. McMullin, Caitlin, 2018. "Co-production and the third sector: A comparative study of England and France," Thesis Commons 578d3, Center for Open Science.
    18. Fangyun Xie & Guiwen Liu & Taozhi Zhuang, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-28, May.
    19. Guiwen Liu & Zhiyong Yi & Xiaoling Zhang & Asheem Shrestha & Igor Martek & Lizhen Wei, 2017. "An Evaluation of Urban Renewal Policies of Shenzhen, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-17, June.
    20. Paul Lawless, 2006. "Area-based Urban Interventions: Rationale and Outcomes: The New Deal for Communities Programme in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(11), pages 1991-2011, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:39:y:2007:i:2:p:260-282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.