IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/enejou/v34y2013i3p105-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Index Investment in Commodity Futures Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Dwight R. Sanders
  • Scott H. Irwin

Abstract

The “Masters Hypothesis†is the claim that unprecedented buyingpres-sure in recent years from new index investment created a massive bubble in commodity futures prices. Due to data limitations, some recent studies of the market impact of index investment in the WTI crude oil futures market impute index positions. We investigate the accuracy of the algorithm popularized by Masters (2008) to estimate index positions. The estimates generated by the Masters algorithm deviate substantially from the positions reported in the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) Index Investment Data (IID) report—the agency’s best data on index positions. The Masters algorithm over-estimates the gross WTI crude oil position by an average of 142,000 contracts. Importantly, the deviation in the first half of 2008, the period of greatest concern about the market impact of index investment, is directionally wrong. These results suggest empirical tests of market impact based on mapping algorithms in WTI crude oil futures should be viewed with considerable caution.

Suggested Citation

  • Dwight R. Sanders & Scott H. Irwin, 2013. "Measuring Index Investment in Commodity Futures Markets," The Energy Journal, , vol. 34(3), pages 105-127, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:34:y:2013:i:3:p:105-127
    DOI: 10.5547/01956574.34.3.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/01956574.34.3.6
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5547/01956574.34.3.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:enejou:v:34:y:2013:i:3:p:105-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.