IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecoind/v27y2006i4p565-585.html

Financial Participation in British, French and German Organizations: A Neoinstitutionalist Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Rüdiger Kabst

    (University of Giessen)

  • Wenzel Matiaske

    (University of Flensburg)

  • Anja Schmelter

    (University of Paderborn)

Abstract

Searching for flexible and competitive remuneration, financial participation has come into focus for both practitioners and scientists. The question of determinants and outcomes of financial participation schemes has been of special interest. Although many excellent studies have been conducted recently, further theory-based and empirically tested research would enrich our understanding of financial participation. Taking the examples of three European countries, namely Great Britain, France and Germany, we examine the explanatory power of neoinstitutionalist arguments in discussing financial participation. The hypotheses generated are tested empirically based on the data of the Cranfield Network on International Strategic Human Resource Management (Cranet).

Suggested Citation

  • Rüdiger Kabst & Wenzel Matiaske & Anja Schmelter, 2006. "Financial Participation in British, French and German Organizations: A Neoinstitutionalist Perspective," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 27(4), pages 565-585, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:27:y:2006:i:4:p:565-585
    DOI: 10.1177/0143831X06068994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143831X06068994
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0143831X06068994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James C. Sesil & Douglas L. Kruse & Joseph R. Blasi, 2001. "Sharing Ownership via Employee Stock Ownership," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2001-25, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simon S Torp, 2016. "The prevalence and antecedents of employee stock ownership in Denmark," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(1), pages 119-144, February.
    2. Krista Jaakson & Epp Kallaste, 2016. "Who uses employee financial participation in an adverse environment? The case of Estonia," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(3), pages 449-467, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanen Maalej & Mohamed Triki, 2008. "Déterminants de la pratique de l'actionnariat salarié dans les entreprises françaises," Post-Print halshs-00525419, HAL.
    2. Andrew M. Robinson & Hao Zhang, 2005. "Employee Share Ownership: Safeguarding Investments in Human Capital," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(3), pages 469-488, September.
    3. Djaoudath Alidou, 2011. "Les augmentations de capital réservées aux salariés en France - Employee Equity Issue:Evidence from France," Working Papers CREGO 1110603, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    4. Philippe Desbrières, 2002. "Les actionnaires salariés," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 141(5), pages 255-281.
    5. Geert Braam & Erik Poutsma, 2015. "Broad-Based Financial Participation Plans and Their Impact on Financial Performance: Evidence from a Dutch Longitudinal Panel," De Economist, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 177-202, June.
    6. Brittany Bunce, 2020. "Dairy Joint Ventures in South Africa’s Land and Agrarian Reform Programme: Who Benefits?," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Mike Wright & Igor Filatotchev & Trevor Buck & Kate Bishop, 2003. "Is Stakeholder Corporate Governance Appropriate in Russia?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 7(3), pages 263-290, September.
    8. Marc-Arthur Diaye & Amal Hili & Rim Lahmandi-Ayed, 2012. "Employee ownership: does firm's size matter ?," Documents de recherche 12-02, Centre d'Études des Politiques Économiques (EPEE), Université d'Evry Val d'Essonne.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecoind:v:27:y:2006:i:4:p:565-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ekhist.uu.se/english.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.