IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ecdequ/v35y2021i3p202-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development Starts With Historical Endowments: Industrial Policy and Leadership Are Catalysts

Author

Listed:
  • Edward (Ned) Hill

Abstract

Ben Armstrong compares the implementation of regional economic development programs in the Pittsburgh and Cleveland metropolitan statistical areas during the 1980s. He argues that their regional economies and research institutions were then similar. He contends that the transformational policy difference occurred when Pennsylvania’s governor mandated that the presidents of Pittsburgh’s research universities be programmatic leaders while Ohio’s governor did not do the same. Armstrong concludes that Pittsburgh’s Metropolitan Statistical Area became a center of high-tech innovation as a result, while Cleveland’s did not. This author contends that disparities in regional technology resources, as well as institutional self-interest and leadership, were the critical differences. Cleveland’s institutions had to give priority to fixing their business problems. Armstrong and the author agree that economic endowments and industrial policy played roles in both regions’ economic outcomes; where they disagree is on the weights given to each.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward (Ned) Hill, 2021. "Development Starts With Historical Endowments: Industrial Policy and Leadership Are Catalysts," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(3), pages 202-215, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:35:y:2021:i:3:p:202-215
    DOI: 10.1177/08912424211024854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08912424211024854
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/08912424211024854?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Shapira, 1990. "Modern Times: Learning from State Initiatives in Industrial Extension and Technology Transfer," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 4(3), pages 186-202, August.
    2. Ben Armstrong, 2021. "Industrial Policy and Local Economic Transformation: Evidence From the U.S. Rust Belt," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(3), pages 181-196, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edward (Ned) Hill, 2023. "What Is Economic Development? And What Is the Job of an Economic Development Professional?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(1), pages 34-48, February.
    2. Ben Armstrong, 2021. "Would Pittsburgh Have Transformed Without State Intervention? A Response to Comments," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(3), pages 216-218, August.
    3. Dan Berglund, 2022. "Toward a More Complete and Nuanced Examination of Ohio and Pennsylvania’s 1980s Technology-Based Economic Development Strategies," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 36(1), pages 59-65, February.
    4. Audrey J. Murrell & Ray Jones & Sam Rose & Alex Firestine & Joe Bute, 2022. "Food Security as Ethics and Social Responsibility: An Application of the Food Abundance Index in an Urban Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irwin Feller, 1997. "Federal and State Government Roles in Science and Technology," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 11(4), pages 283-295, November.
    2. Andrew M. Isserman, 1993. "State Economic Development Policy and Practice in the United States: A Survey Article," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 16(1-2), pages 49-100, April.
    3. Shapira, Philip & Kingsley, Gordon & Youtie, Jan, 1997. "Manufacturing partnerships: Evaluation in the context of government reform," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 103-112, February.
    4. P Shapira & T Rephann, 1996. "The Adoption of New Technology in West Virginia: Implications for Manufacturing Modernization Policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 14(4), pages 431-450, December.
    5. Leistritz, F. Larry & Wanzek, Janet K., 1992. "Rural Manufacturers Attributes, Intentions and Needs of Manitoba, North Dakota and Saskatchewan Firms," Agricultural Economics Miscellaneous Reports 51192, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    6. Luisa Gagliardi & Enrico Moretti & Michel Serafinelli, 2023. "The World’s Rust Belts: The Heterogeneous Effects of Deindustrialization on 1,993 Cities in Six Countries," Working Paper series 23-17, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    7. Shapira, Philip & Youtie, Jan & Roessner, J. David, 1996. "Current practices in the evaluation of US industrial modernization programs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 185-214, March.
    8. Natalie A. Davila, 2004. "Evaluating Manufacturing Extension: A Multidimensional approach," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 18(3), pages 286-302, August.
    9. Dan Berglund, 2022. "Toward a More Complete and Nuanced Examination of Ohio and Pennsylvania’s 1980s Technology-Based Economic Development Strategies," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 36(1), pages 59-65, February.
    10. Bozeman, Barry, 2000. "Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 627-655, April.
    11. Zongguo Ma & Xueai Fan & Yanli Zhang & Beibei Hu, 2023. "Understanding the Influencing Factors of Enterprise Transformation and Upgrading Capability: A Case Study of the National Innovation Demonstration Zones, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    12. Sabina Deitrick & Christopher Briem, 2021. "The Pittsburgh Transition: Not Quite So Simple," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(3), pages 197-201, August.
    13. Shapira, Philip, 2001. "US manufacturing extension partnerships: technology policy reinvented?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 977-992, June.
    14. Gatto, Francisco, 1994. "El desafío de la internacionalización y el MERCOSUR para las PYMEs argentinas," Oficina de la CEPAL en Buenos Aires (Estudios e Investigaciones) 28626, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    15. Luisa Gagliardi & Enrico Moretti & Michel Serafinelli, 2023. "The World’s Rust Belts: The Heterogeneous Effects of Deindustrialization on 1,993 Cities in Six Countries," CESifo Working Paper Series 10826, CESifo.
    16. Maryellen R. Kelley, 1997. "From Mission to Commercial Orientation: Perils and Possibilities for Federal Industrial Technology Policy," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 11(4), pages 313-328, November.
    17. Gagliardi, Luisa & Moretti, Enrico & Serafinelli, Michel, 2023. "The World's Rust Belts: The Heterogeneous Effects of Deindustrialization on 1,993 Cities in Six Countries," IZA Discussion Papers 16648, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Ben Armstrong, 2021. "Would Pittsburgh Have Transformed Without State Intervention? A Response to Comments," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 35(3), pages 216-218, August.
    19. Irwin Feller, 1993. "What agricultural extension has to offer as a model for manufacturing modernization," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(3), pages 574-581.
    20. Kolodny, Harvey & Stymne, Bengt & Shani, Rami & Figuera, Juan Ramon & Lillrank, Paul, 2001. "Design and policy choices for technology extension organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 201-225, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ecdequ:v:35:y:2021:i:3:p:202-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.