IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v59y2023i2p191-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motives and Resources of Traditional Chinese Foreign Aid, 1949–1994

Author

Listed:
  • Cengiz Mert Bulut

Abstract

Since the establishment of traditional Chinese foreign aid, the People’s Republic of China has participated as both a donor and a recipient in foreign aid mechanisms. This has become a major issue in international relations. Until the Export-Import Bank of China and the China Development Bank were established in 1994, Chinese foreign aid could be considered traditional. As the focus of this study, traditional Chinese foreign aid has gained a disparate place in the literature due to its high level of involvement with aid mechanisms, domestic economic resources and motivations. In particular, the relationship between the PRC’s foreign aid motivations and its economic resources showed how effectively mainland China applied the foreign aid mechanism, which has been one of the main issues of these international relations. This study examines the relationship between the different economic conditions and foreign aid motivations of the Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping periods and attempts to reveal certain continuities and changes between the two periods.

Suggested Citation

  • Cengiz Mert Bulut, 2023. "Motives and Resources of Traditional Chinese Foreign Aid, 1949–1994," China Report, , vol. 59(2), pages 191-206, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:59:y:2023:i:2:p:191-206
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455231181518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455231181518
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455231181518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zehlia Babaci-Wilhite & Macleans A. Geo-JaJa & Lou Shizhou, 2013. "China's aid to Africa: competitor or alternative to the OECD aid architecture?," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 40(8), pages 729-743, June.
    2. Naughton, Barry J., 2018. "The Chinese Economy: Adaptation and Growth, second edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262534797, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott Rozelle & Yiran Xia & Dimitris Friesen & Bronson Vanderjack & Nourya Cohen, 2020. "Moving Beyond Lewis: Employment and Wage Trends in China’s High- and Low-Skilled Industries and the Emergence of an Era of Polarization," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 62(4), pages 555-589, December.
    2. Thomas F. Remington & Andrei A. Yakovlev & Elena Ovchinnikova & Alexander Chasovsky, 2020. "Career Trajectories Of Regional Officials: Russia And China Before And After 2012," HSE Working papers WP BRP 754/PS/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Dongshui Xie & Caiquan Bai & Huimin Wang & Qihang Xue, 2022. "The Land System and the Rise and Fall of China’s Rural Industrialization: Based on the Perspective of Institutional Change of Rural Collective Construction Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Ma, Shuang & Mu, Ren, 2020. "Forced off the farm? Farmers’ labor allocation response to land requisition in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Lintunen, Julia, 2021. "An overview of China's regional trade agreements," BOFIT Policy Briefs 1/2021, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    6. Bingdao Zheng & Yanfeng Gu, 2022. "Institutional dynamics and access to non‐farm employment in rural China, 1950–1996," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 265-289, November.
    7. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde & Lee E. Ohanian & Wen Yao, 2023. "The Neoclassical Growth of China," NBER Working Papers 31351, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Jiwei Qian & Tuan‐Hwee Sng, 2021. "The state in Chinese economic history," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 359-395, November.
    9. Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, 2019. "Rents and economic development: the perspective of Why Nations Fail," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 13-28, October.
    10. David Autor & David Dorn & Gordon Hanson & Kaveh Majlesi, 2020. "Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(10), pages 3139-3183, October.
    11. Sattich, Thomas & Freeman, Duncan & Scholten, Daniel & Yan, Shaohua, 2021. "Renewable energy in EU-China relations: Policy interdependence and its geopolitical implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Gustafsson, Björn Anders & Nivorozhkina, Ludmila & Wan, Haiyuan, 2021. "Working Beyond the Normal Retirement Age in Urban China and Urban Russia," IZA Discussion Papers 14294, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Emilio Carnevali & André Pedersen Ystehede, 2023. "Is socialism back? A review of contemporary economic literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 239-270, April.
    14. David A. Ralston & Carolyn P. Egri & Irina Naoumova & Len J. Treviño & Katsuhiko Shimizu & Yongjuan Li, 2020. "An empirical test of the trichotomy of values crossvergence theory," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 65-90, March.
    15. Mykola Bunyk & Leonid Krasnozhon, 2023. "State capacity and the socialist calculation debate," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 694-707, January.
    16. Liu, Ailan & Tang, Bo, 2018. "US and China aid to Africa: Impact on the donor-recipient trade relations," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 46-65.
    17. Miaojie Yu, 2020. "China-US Trade War and Trade Talk," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-15-3785-1, September.
    18. Iikka Korhonen, 2019. "Forty Years of Chinese Reforms: An Overview," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 61(3), pages 349-358, September.
    19. Aleksi Ylönen, 2020. "The Dragon and the Horn: Reflections on China–Africa Strategic Relations," Insight on Africa, , vol. 12(2), pages 145-159, July.
    20. Gustafsson, Björn Anders & Zhang, Yudan, 2021. "Self-Employment in Rural China: Its Development, Characteristics, and Relation to Income," IZA Discussion Papers 14535, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:59:y:2023:i:2:p:191-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.