IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/chnrpt/v59y2023i2p191-206.html

Motives and Resources of Traditional Chinese Foreign Aid, 1949–1994

Author

Listed:
  • Cengiz Mert Bulut

Abstract

Since the establishment of traditional Chinese foreign aid, the People’s Republic of China has participated as both a donor and a recipient in foreign aid mechanisms. This has become a major issue in international relations. Until the Export-Import Bank of China and the China Development Bank were established in 1994, Chinese foreign aid could be considered traditional. As the focus of this study, traditional Chinese foreign aid has gained a disparate place in the literature due to its high level of involvement with aid mechanisms, domestic economic resources and motivations. In particular, the relationship between the PRC’s foreign aid motivations and its economic resources showed how effectively mainland China applied the foreign aid mechanism, which has been one of the main issues of these international relations. This study examines the relationship between the different economic conditions and foreign aid motivations of the Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping periods and attempts to reveal certain continuities and changes between the two periods.

Suggested Citation

  • Cengiz Mert Bulut, 2023. "Motives and Resources of Traditional Chinese Foreign Aid, 1949–1994," China Report, , vol. 59(2), pages 191-206, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:59:y:2023:i:2:p:191-206
    DOI: 10.1177/00094455231181518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00094455231181518
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00094455231181518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zehlia Babaci-Wilhite & Macleans A. Geo-JaJa & Lou Shizhou, 2013. "China's aid to Africa: competitor or alternative to the OECD aid architecture?," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 40(8), pages 729-743, June.
    2. Choh-Ming Li, 1963. "What Happened to the Great Leap Forward?," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(10), pages 4-7, August.
    3. Naughton, Barry J., 2018. "The Chinese Economy: Adaptation and Growth, second edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262534797, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott Rozelle & Yiran Xia & Dimitris Friesen & Bronson Vanderjack & Nourya Cohen, 2020. "Correction to: Moving Beyond Lewis: Employment and Wage Trends in China’s High- and Low-Skilled Industries and the Emergence of an Era of Polarization," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 62(4), pages 774-775, December.
    2. Cheng, Hong & Fan, Hanbing & Hoshi, Takeo & Hu, Dezhuang, 2024. "State ownership, political connection, and innovation subsidies in China," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Thomas F. Remington & Andrei A. Yakovlev & Elena Ovchinnikova & Alexander Chasovsky, 2020. "Career Trajectories Of Regional Officials: Russia And China Before And After 2012," HSE Working papers WP BRP 754/PS/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Dongshui Xie & Caiquan Bai & Huimin Wang & Qihang Xue, 2022. "The Land System and the Rise and Fall of China’s Rural Industrialization: Based on the Perspective of Institutional Change of Rural Collective Construction Land," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Bingdao Zheng & Yanfeng Gu, 2022. "Institutional dynamics and access to non‐farm employment in rural China, 1950–1996," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 265-289, November.
    6. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde & Lee E. Ohanian & Wen Yao, 2023. "The Neoclassical Growth of China," NBER Working Papers 31351, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Hu, Zhi-An & Huang, Wei & Luo, Wei & You, Wuyue & Zhang, Chuanchuan, 2024. "The educational and labor market consequences of teenage exposure to rural land decollectivization in China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    8. Xiaodan Jin & Eunhye Kim & Kyung-chul Kim & Sitian Chen, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Innovative Knowledge Generation: Exploring Trends in the Use of Early Childhood Education Apps in Chinese Families," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12253-12292, September.
    9. David Autor & David Dorn & Gordon Hanson & Kaveh Majlesi, 2020. "Importing Political Polarization? The Electoral Consequences of Rising Trade Exposure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(10), pages 3139-3183, October.
    10. Gustafsson, Björn Anders & Nivorozhkina, Ludmila & Wan, Haiyuan, 2021. "Working Beyond the Normal Retirement Age in Urban China and Urban Russia," IZA Discussion Papers 14294, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Emilio Carnevali & André Pedersen Ystehede, 2023. "Is socialism back? A review of contemporary economic literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 239-270, April.
    12. Huang, Xiaodi & Chen, Xiaoxiong & Liang, Zuming & Wu, Hongjie & Kang, Siyang, 2025. "Fair competition and investment behavior of foreign-invested firms—Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 2234-2246.
    13. Mykola Bunyk & Leonid Krasnozhon, 2023. "State capacity and the socialist calculation debate," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 694-707, January.
    14. Cheng, Rui & Li, Jing & Wu, Ting, 2024. "Competition policy and labor income share: Evidence from the antitrust policy in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 966-977.
    15. Svatoň Petr, 2025. "More than Protectionism: Unbundling U.S. Motives in the Trade and Technological War with China," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 15-28.
    16. Miaojie Yu, 2020. "China-US Trade War and Trade Talk," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-15-3785-1, December.
    17. Qu, Hongyan & Ding, Zhujun & Ahlstrom, David & Wu, Changqi & Cai, Huifen Helen, 2025. "When I have to versus when I am able to: Behavioral and resource explanations for firms’ international expansion via exporting," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(1).
    18. Linda Calabrese & Rhys Jenkins & Lorena Lombardozzi, 2024. "The Belt and Road Initiative and Dynamics of Structural Transformation," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(3), pages 515-547, June.
    19. Venkat Ram Reddy Ganuthula & Krishna Kumar Balaraman, 2025. "The Nexus of Money and Political Legitimacy: A Comparative Analysis of Democracies and Non-Democracies," Papers 2505.09128, arXiv.org.
    20. Iikka Korhonen, 2019. "Forty Years of Chinese Reforms: An Overview," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 61(3), pages 349-358, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:chnrpt:v:59:y:2023:i:2:p:191-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.