IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v18y2026i1p10-27.html

Social Capabilities and Corporate Zakat Commitment: Evidence from Mission-Driven and Stakeholder Management Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Nurul Fatma Aziz
  • Zuraina Sal Sabila Mohamed
  • Muhsin Nor Paizin
  • Muhammad Kamil Husain

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of social capabilities on corporate zakat commitment, drawing on the Social Resource-Based View (SRBV) framework. While corporate zakat represents an important Islamic social finance mechanism, its implementation remains largely voluntary, resulting in inconsistent participation among firms. This study focuses on two key dimensions of social capabilities, mission-driven capabilities and stakeholder management capabilities, to explain variations in corporate zakat commitment among zakat-paying companies in Malaysia. Using survey data collected from the senior management of 142 corporate Zakat payers, the study applies partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to test the proposed relationships. The findings indicate that stakeholder management capabilities have a significant positive effect on corporate zakat commitment, whereas mission-driven capabilities do not exhibit a statistically significant influence. These results suggest that effective stakeholder engagement, communication, and accountability mechanisms are more critical to motivating corporate Zakat practices than the formal inclusion of Zakat within organisational mission statements. The study contributes to accounting and Islamic governance literature by providing empirical evidence on the role of social capabilities in shaping voluntary zakat commitment. From a practical perspective, the findings highlight the importance of stakeholder-oriented governance strategies for zakat institutions, regulators, and corporations seeking to enhance zakat compliance and reporting practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurul Fatma Aziz & Zuraina Sal Sabila Mohamed & Muhsin Nor Paizin & Muhammad Kamil Husain, 2026. "Social Capabilities and Corporate Zakat Commitment: Evidence from Mission-Driven and Stakeholder Management Perspectives," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 18(1), pages 10-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:10-27
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v18i1(j).4789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4789/3197
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4789
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v18i1(j).4789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minna Halme & Juha Laurila, 2009. "Philanthropy, Integration or Innovation? Exploring the Financial and Societal Outcomes of Different Types of Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 325-339, February.
    2. Timothy Donnelly & Mark Wickham, 2020. "Exploring the antecedent resources and capabilities of strategic corporate social responsibility," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(7), pages 985-1006, September.
    3. Janthorn Sinthupundaja & Y. Kohda & N. Chiadamrong, 2020. "Examining Capabilities of Social Entrepreneurship for Shared Value Creation," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Yuanyuan Zhang & Zhe Ouyang, 2021. "Doing well by doing good: How corporate environmental responsibility influences corporate financial performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 54-63, January.
    5. Edilson Bacinello & Gérson Tontini & Anete Alberton, 2020. "Influence of maturity on corporate social responsibility and sustainable innovation in business performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 749-759, March.
    6. Janthorn Sinthupundaja & Navee Chiadamrong & Youji Kohda & Suttipong Thajchayapong, 2020. "Influence of intra and inter-organisational relationships on CSR and their impact on a hospital's financial performance," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 78-95.
    7. Muhammad Khalid Anser & Zahid Yousaf & Abdul Majid & Muhammad Yasir, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility commitment and participation predict environmental and social performance?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2578-2587, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yihua Wu & Muhammad Farrukh & Ali Raza & Fanchen Meng & Imtiaz Alam, 2021. "Framing the evolution of the corporate social responsibility and environmental management journal," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1397-1411, July.
    2. M. Kabir Hassan & Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Jennifer Brodmann & Abu Bashar & Himani Grewal, 2023. "Bibliometric and Scientometric analysis on CSR practices in the banking sector," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 177-196, April.
    3. García-Piqueres, Gema & García-Ramos, Rebeca, 2022. "Complementarity between CSR dimensions and innovation: behaviour, objective or both?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 475-489.
    4. Hema Diwan & Binilkumar Amarayil Sreeraman, 2024. "From financial reporting to ESG reporting: a bibliometric analysis of the evolution in corporate sustainability disclosures," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 13769-13805, June.
    5. Dirk Boehe & Luciano Barin Cruz, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Differentiation Strategy and Export Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 325-346, February.
    6. Nosheena Yasir & Nasir Mahmood & Hafiz Shakir Mehmood & Osama Rashid & An Liren, 2021. "The Integrated Role of Personal Values and Theory of Planned Behavior to Form a Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Chang He & Junzhi Zhang & Liukai Wang & Weiqing Wang & Fei Li, 2025. "Targeted poverty alleviation and corporate financial performance: The CSR strategy perspective," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(2), pages 631-653, May.
    8. Kumar, V. & D. Hollebeek, Linda & Sharma, Amalesh & Rajan, Bharath & K Srivastava, Rajendra, 2025. "Responsible stakeholder engagement marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    9. Hongyi Mao & Zongjun Wang & Lin Yi, 2021. "Does Entrepreneurial Orientation Lead to Successful Sustainable Innovation? The Evidence from Chinese Environmentally Friendly Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Jared Peifer, 2014. "Fund Loyalty Among Socially Responsible Investors: The Importance of the Economic and Ethical Domains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(4), pages 635-649, June.
    11. Maurizio Massaro & Francesca Dal Mas & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Carlo Bagnoli, 2020. "Crypto‐economy and new sustainable business models: Reflections and projections using a case study analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2150-2160, September.
    12. Claudiu Constantin Oancea, 2020. "Living Communist History in the Living Room: The Communist Consumer Museum in Timisoara, Romania," Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Filosofie si Stiinte umaniste/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Philosophy and Humanistic Sciences, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 08-19, June.
    13. Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro & J. Alfredo Flores‐Hernández & Lourdes Pérez & Guadalupe Valera‐Blanes, 2020. "CSR and branding in emerging economies: The effect of incomes and education," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2765-2776, November.
    14. María José Sanzo & Luis Ignacio Álvarez & Marta Rey, 2017. "Lights and Shadows of Business-Nonprofit Partnerships: The Role of Nonprofit Learning and Empowerment in this Ethical Puzzle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-21, August.
    15. Jing Deng & Yun Zhang & Xiaoyun Xing & Cheng Liu, 2022. "Can Carbon Neutrality Commitment Contribute to the Sustainable Development of China’s New Energy Companies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Maja Mijatov Ladičorbić & Aleksandra S. Dragin & Tamara Jovanović & Milica Solarević & Olja Munitlak Ivanović & Vladimir Stojanović & Kristina Košić & Anđelija Ivkov Džigurski & Slavica Tomić & Mirosl, 2023. "Tourism Stakeholder Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in Serbia: The Perception of Hotel Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Yusen Dong & Senhua Chen & Yixue Wu, 2023. "Keeping up with the Joneses: The role of investee peers corporate environmental responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1841-1855, July.
    18. Plesea Doru Alexandru & Petre Adrian & Olaru Stelian Mircea, 2023. "How Companies Can Gain a Sustainable Competitive Advantage in the New Digital Era? The Case of Romania," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 2002-2013, July.
    19. Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen & Wencke Gwozdz & Kerli Kant Hvass, 2018. "Exploring the Relationship Between Business Model Innovation, Corporate Sustainability, and Organisational Values within the Fashion Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 267-284, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:10-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.