IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rjr/romjef/v5y2008i3p80-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Of Critical Control Points Of Alternative Decisions On The Choice Of Performance Based Budgeting System: The Analysis Of The Practices In Turkey’S Public Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Tugen, Kamil

    () (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylul University)

  • Akdeniz, H. Ahmet

    () (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylul University)

  • Egeli, Haluk

    () (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylül University)

  • Aksarayli, Mehmet

    () (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylül University)

  • Ozen, Ahmet

    () (Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at Dokuz Eylül University)

Abstract

Performance-Based Budgeting (PBB) System is one of the latest techniques achieved in the development process of modern budgeting systems. The system basically requires public institutions to prepare budgets in accordance with market-focused administration approach. The system is based on allocating the budget in order to give the most convenient subsidy for the institutional operations to enable the effective use of resources. Institutional activities are assessed according to pre-determined performance criteria and the way to reach the target performance level is called forth. In this study, first, critical control points are determined to enable the state to reach PBB by providing transition between budgeting systems. After critical control points are formed, a diagram is drawn to show the effectiveness of PBB and the factors that may affect the processing of the system negatively or positively are explained. After that, operational levels of institutions according to the critical control points are obtained as the result of a situational analysis of PBB in various public institutions in Turkey. Moreover, public institutions in the study are classified from a functional point of view and comparative analyses are made according to operational levels. Regarding the result of the analyses some suggestions on adapting the PBB systems to the public institutions are made. We concluded that the system cannot be applied effectively without completing all the steps towards PBB.

Suggested Citation

  • Tugen, Kamil & Akdeniz, H. Ahmet & Egeli, Haluk & Aksarayli, Mehmet & Ozen, Ahmet, 2008. "Analysis Of Critical Control Points Of Alternative Decisions On The Choice Of Performance Based Budgeting System: The Analysis Of The Practices In Turkey’S Public Institutions," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 5(3), pages 80-99, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rjr:romjef:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:80-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ipe.ro/rjef/rjef3_08/rjef3_08_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teresa Curristine, 2006. "Government Performance: Lessons and Challenges," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 127-151.
    2. Jón R. Blöndal, 2001. "Budgeting in Sweden," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 27-57.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Budgeting; Strategic Planning; Performance Evaluation; Performance Criterion; Performance-based Budgeting; Optimization;

    JEL classification:

    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rjr:romjef:v:5:y:2008:i:3:p:80-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Corina Saman). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ipacaro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.