Measuring Factor Substitution with Neoclassical Models: An Experimental Evaluation
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the performance of neoclassical cost functions in estimating input substitution. In contrast to earlier studies, this analysis assumes that the "true" technology is represented by each of three large-scale, engineering, process analysis models. Experimental methods are used to evaluate the effect of the definition of factor inputs, the characteristics of the technologies, and the presence of residual discharge constraints on measures of input association. The findings support the use of approximate significance tests as an integral part of the interpretation of the neoclassical estimates. They suggest that input aggregation reduces the ability of neoclassical methods to isolate input associations. Finally, they indicate that residual discharge constraints can, if ignored in modeling, distort measured substitution relations.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 11 (1980)
Issue (Month): 2 (Autumn)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.rje.org|
|Order Information:||Web: https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/rje_online.cgi|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:11:y:1980:i:autumn:p:631-655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.