IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v8y2019i3p33-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Strategic Approach to the Consumer Perception of Brand on the Basis of Brand Awareness and Brand Loyalty:A Comparative Analysis of Coke & Pepsi Brands in Erbil KRI

Author

Listed:
  • Khurram Sultan

    (PhD.Lecturer at Business Administration Department-Lebanese French University Erbil)

  • Saja Akram

    (Research Scholarsat Lebanese French University Erbil)

  • Sara Abdulhaliq

    (Research Scholarsat Lebanese French University Erbil)

  • Deema Jamal

    (Research Scholarsat Lebanese French University Erbil)

  • Rezan Saleem

    (Research Scholarsat Lebanese French University Erbil)

Abstract

In this study, the consumer perception for brand awareness and brand loyalty for two famous brands of soft drinks Coca Cola and Pepsi, has been evaluated. For this purpose, the effects of consumer perception of Coke and Pepsi were analysed for consumer association to these brands. The objectives of the study are multi fold (I) Studying onthe consumers preferences (II) to illustrate which brand’s advertisement mostly people have seen, (iii) demonstrate the reason to buy cola drinks or Pepsi drinks (iv) assessment of the creation of a top of mind awareness about COCA COLA in, Erbil KRI by providing the information to consumers. Sample size were selected 50 consumers of drinks (PePsi and Coca Cola ). Data collected and analyzed by using Microsoft office 2010 version. Results revealed that consumers of Pepsi and Coca cola most of the consumer found toward coca cola and they like coca cola as compare to Pepsi and the reason behind it is the strong taste of coca cola such as 60 % people answered that they remember more advertisement as compare to Pepsi and others. and 90% said coca cola is easily available in their approach and also 70 % people answer that they like coca cola due to its strong taste so the overall research survey for Coke and Pepsi has revealed that Coke is more adopted brand then that of Pepsi and recommendations are recommended such as perception leads to the brand loyalty, thus brands in general and Coke and Pepsi needs to focus on the point that its consumers are made to perceive more value from the brand which can come through assuring them about quality of product and other factor i.e. best price, best value, availability, trend etc. Key Words:Consumer Perception, Brand Awareness, Brand Loyalty

Suggested Citation

  • Khurram Sultan & Saja Akram & Sara Abdulhaliq & Deema Jamal & Rezan Saleem, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to the Consumer Perception of Brand on the Basis of Brand Awareness and Brand Loyalty:A Comparative Analysis of Coke & Pepsi Brands in Erbil KRI," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(3), pages 33-44, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:33-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/259/247
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/259
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajagopal, 2010. "Interdependence of personality traits and brand identity in measuring brand performance," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(5), pages 411-426.
    2. Joseph P. H. Fan & T. J. Wong, 2005. "Do External Auditors Perform a Corporate Governance Role in Emerging Markets? Evidence from East Asia," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 35-72, March.
    3. Robert G Wallace & Marius Gilbert & Rodrick Wallace & Claudia Pittiglio & Raffaele Mattioli & Richard Kock, 2014. "Did Ebola Emerge in West Africa by a Policy-Driven Phase Change in Agroecology? Ebola's Social Context," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(11), pages 2533-2542, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianjun Li & Zhenyu Gu & Yonghui Dai, 2022. "Impact of Sports Sponsorship Motivation on Consumer Purchase Intention: Mediating Effect Based on Consumer Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ebrahim, Ahmed & Fattah, Tarek Abdel, 2015. "Corporate governance and initial compliance with IFRS in emerging markets: The case of income tax accounting in Egypt," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 46-60.
    2. Vanessa Carvalho Pereira & Antonio Gualberto Pereira & José Sérgio Casé Oliveira, 2023. "Influence of ownership structure on the choice of Big Four independent auditors," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 316-326, September.
    3. Xingtong Fang & Kaigang He & Beilei Mei & Jianfang Ye, 2023. "The Role of Auditing Firms in the Implementation of New Accounting Standards: Evidence from China," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(2), pages 541-569, June.
    4. Ola Nilsson, 2018. "The relationship between shareholder protection through regulation and the demand for external auditor services," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(3), pages 162-175, August.
    5. Shujun Ding & Chunxin Jia & Zhenyu Wu, 2016. "Mutual Fund Activism and Market Regulation During the Pre-IFRS Period: The Case of Earnings Informativeness in China from an Ethical Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(4), pages 765-785, November.
    6. Deqiu Chen & Li Li & Xuejiao Liu & Gerald J. Lobo, 2018. "Social Trust and Auditor Reporting Conservatism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 1083-1108, December.
    7. Jamaani, Fouad & Ahmed, Abdullahi D., 2021. "Modifier effects of country-level transparency on global underpricing difference: New hierarchical evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Habib, Ahsan & Ranasinghe, Dinithi & Muhammadi, Abdul Haris & Islam, Ainul, 2018. "Political connections, financial reporting and auditing: Survey of the empirical literature," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 37-51.
    9. Irfah Najihah Basir Malan & Norhana Salamudin & Noryati Ahmad, 2013. "Ownership and Control Divergence on Firm Value," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 4(1), pages 78-85, January.
    10. Dachen Sheng & Huijun Cheng & Minmin Yin, 2024. "Housing Developers’ Heterogeneous Decision-Making under Negative Shock after the High-Growth Era: Evidence from the Chinese Real Estate Economy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Luo, Qi & Li, Hui & Zhang, Biao, 2015. "Financing constraints and the cost of equity: Evidence on the moral hazard of the controlling shareholder," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 99-106.
    12. Wu, Soushan & Chen, Chin-Mei & Lee, Pei-Ching, 2016. "Independent directors and earnings management: The moderating effects of controlling shareholders and the divergence of cash-flow and control rights," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 153-165.
    13. Farooq Omar & Tabine Sonia, 2015. "Agency Problems and the Choice of Auditors: Evidence from the MENA Region," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 79-97, April.
    14. repec:zbw:bofitp:2013_020 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Chang, Yu-Shan & Chiang, Chia-Yu & Liu, Li-Lin (Sunny) & Xie, Xinmei (Lucy), 2019. "Audit partner independence and business affiliation: evidence from Taiwan," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Fu, Yishu, 2019. "The value of corporate governance: Evidence from the Chinese anti-corruption campaign," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 461-476.
    17. Saibal Ghosh, 2011. "Firm ownership type, earnings management and auditor relationships: evidence from India," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(4), pages 350-369, April.
    18. Aree Saeed MUSTAFA & Luqman Muhammed SAEED & Nishtiman Hashim MOHAMMED, 2018. "Auditor Selection in Borsa Istanbul," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 16(152), pages 599-599.
    19. Nurul Nazlia Jamil, 2020. "The Power of Political Connections: Review on the Impacts of Audit Committee and Corporate Governance," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 333347-3333, December.
    20. César Camisón & José Antonio Clemente & Sergio Camisón-Haba, 2022. "Asset tangibility, information asymmetries and intangibles as determinants of family firms leverage," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(7), pages 2047-2082, October.
    21. Li, Zhuo & Wen, Fenghua & Huang, Zhijian James, 2023. "Asymmetric response to earnings news across different sentiment states: The role of cognitive dissonance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:33-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.