IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v13y2024i2p31-38.html

Factors influencing organizational culture on business performance among employers in technological micro-enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Christiana Kappo-Abidemi

    (University of Mpumalanga)

  • Oyebisi Olaleye Oyewole

    (African Institute for Science Policy and Innovation, Obafemi Awolowo University, P.M.B 13, Ile-Ife, Osun State, 220282, Nigeria)

  • Abiodun Isaac Oyebola

    (African Institute for Science Policy and Innovation, Obafemi Awolowo University, P.M.B 13, Ile-Ife, Osun State, 220282, Nigeria)

  • Titilayo Olubunmi Olaposi

    (African Institute for Science Policy and Innovation, Obafemi Awolowo University, P.M.B 13, Ile-Ife, Osun State, 220282, Nigeria)

  • Funke Tawakalitu Adedeji

    (African Institute for Science Policy and Innovation, Obafemi Awolowo University, P.M.B 13, Ile-Ife, Osun State, 220282, Nigeria)

Abstract

Microenterprises are crucial in sustaining the economy, especially in developing economies like Nigeria. Many of these microenterprises do not take cognizance of necessary determinants like organizational culture and its factors to ensure proper running of their day-to-day activities. The study aims to identify some demographic statistics of employers in technological microenterprises, investigate the factors influencing organizational culture and assess organizational culture's influence on business success among employers in selected technological microenterprises in southwest Nigeria. The study was carried out in three southwestern states in Nigeria with 213 business owners (employers) as respondents. Seventeen factors were explored, but eight were extracted to be considered in measuring the employers' organizational culture: climate, customer demand, technological changes, observed behaviour, norms, consistency, adaptability, and sense of mission. Linear regression analysis was also used to measure organizational culture's impact on technological microenterprises' business performance with SPSS as a statistical tool. The study confirms a positive and significant relationship between organizational culture and business performance at 5% significance. This study concludes that the eight variables extracted are important factors to consider when measuring the organizational culture of employers in technological microenterprises in southwest Nigeria for better business production. Key Words:Organizational culture, technological microenterprises, employers, business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Christiana Kappo-Abidemi & Oyebisi Olaleye Oyewole & Abiodun Isaac Oyebola & Titilayo Olubunmi Olaposi & Funke Tawakalitu Adedeji, 2024. "Factors influencing organizational culture on business performance among employers in technological micro-enterprises," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(2), pages 31-38, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:31-38
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3190/2221
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3190
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3190?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohsen Motiei, 2022. "Explanation and classification of technological entrepreneurship financing policies: lessons from Iran," International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(2), pages 274-290, March.
    2. Pablo Fajnzylber & William Maloney & Gabriel Montes Rojas, 2006. "Microenterprise Dynamics in Developing Countries: How Similar are They to Those in the Industrialized World? Evidence from Mexico," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 20(3), pages 389-419.
    3. Adeyinka Oluwa & Umar Abbas Ibrahim, 2021. "Investigating the influence of organisational culture on the performance of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs):Evidence from Nigeria," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 485-495, June.
    4. I. T. Jolliffe, 1972. "Discarding Variables in a Principal Component Analysis. I: Artificial Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 21(2), pages 160-173, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonika Redhu & Pragati Jain, 2024. "Unveiling the nexus between water scarcity and socioeconomic development in the water-scarce countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19557-19577, August.
    2. Colosimo Bianca Maria & Moya Ester Gutierrez & Moroni Giovanni & Petrò Stefano, 2008. "Statistical Sampling Strategies for Geometric Tolerance Inspection by CMM," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1), pages 109-121, January.
    3. Rodríguez-Planas, Núria, 2007. "What Works Best for Getting the Unemployed Back to Work: Employment Services or Small-Business Assistance Programmes? Evidence from Romania," IZA Discussion Papers 3051, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Ane Elixabete Ripoll-Zarraga & José Luis Franco Miguel & Carmen Fullana Belda, 2025. "Visualisation of Data Envelopment Analysis in primary health services," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 207-233, June.
    5. Surbhi Kesar, 2023. "Economic transition, dualism and informality in India: Nature and patterns of household‐level transitions," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 2438-2469, November.
    6. Jonathan Fu & Annette Krauss, 2024. "Preparing fertile ground: how does the quality of business environments affect MSE growth?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 51-103, June.
    7. Oana Pricopoaia & Andreea Valentina Busila & Nicoleta Cristache & Irina Susanu & Cosmin Matis, 2024. "Challenges for entrepreneurial innovation: Startups as tools for a better knowledge-based economy," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 969-1010, June.
    8. Tidiane Kinda & Josef Loening, 2010. "Small Enterprise Growth and the Rural Investment Climate: Evidence from Tanzania," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 22(1), pages 173-207.
    9. Sürücü, Lütfi & YIKILMAZ, İbrahim & MASLAKÇI, Ahmet, 2022. "Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) in Quantitative Researches and Practical Considerations," OSF Preprints fgd4e, Center for Open Science.
    10. Hatem Jemmali & Mohamed Salah Matoussi, 2012. "A Multidimensional Analysis of Water Poverty at A Local Scale- Application of Improved Water Poverty Index for Tunisia," Working Papers 730, Economic Research Forum, revised 2012.
    11. Fiala, Nathan, 2018. "Returns to microcredit, cash grants and training for male and female microentrepreneurs in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 189-200.
    12. Reeg, Caroline, 2015. "Micro and small enterprises as drivers for job creation and decent work," IDOS Discussion Papers 10/2015, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    13. Falco, Paolo & Kerr, Andrew & Rankin, Neil & Sandefur, Justin & Teal, Francis, 2011. "The returns to formality and informality in urban Africa," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(S1), pages 23-31.
    14. Antonio Baez-Morales, 2015. "“Differences in efficiency between Formal and Informal Micro Firms in Mexico”," AQR Working Papers 201510, University of Barcelona, Regional Quantitative Analysis Group, revised May 2015.
    15. Pattravadee Ploykitikoon & Charles M. Weber, 2019. "Knowledge Pathways and Performance: An Empirical Study of the National Laboratories in a Technology Latecomer Country," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(03), pages 1-37, May.
    16. Gweneth Leigh & Milica Muminovic & Rachel Davey, 2023. "Enjoyed by Jack but Endured by Jill: An Exploratory Case Study Examining Differences in Adolescent Design Preferences and Perceived Impacts of a Secondary Schoolyard," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    17. Pacheco, Joaquín & Casado, Silvia & Porras, Santiago, 2013. "Exact methods for variable selection in principal component analysis: Guide functions and pre-selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 95-111.
    18. Gabriel V. Montes Rojas & Lucas Siga, 2009. "On the nature of micro-entrepreneurship: evidence from Argentina," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(21), pages 2667-2680.
    19. Jérome SARACCO & Marie CHAVENT & Vanessa KUENTZ, 2010. "Clustering of categorical variables around latent variables," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2010-02, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    20. David McKenzie & Christopher Woodruff, 2014. "What Are We Learning from Business Training and Entrepreneurship Evaluations around the Developing World?," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 29(1), pages 48-82.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:31-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.