IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rai/indbez/doi10.1688-indb-2015-03-gaertner.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kollektive Lohnverhandlungen und der Gender Wage Gap: Befunde aus einer qualitativen Studie (Collective bargaining and the gender wage gap: Findings from a qualitative study)

Author

Listed:
  • Gaertner, Debora
  • Grimm, Veronika
  • Lang, Julia
  • Stephan, Gesine

Abstract

Empirische Studien weisen darauf hin, dass der Gender Wage Gap – die geschlechtsspezifische Lohnluecke – im Tarifbereich geringer als im nicht-tarifgebundenen Bereich der Wirtschaft ausfaellt. Dennoch ist es eine weitgehend offene Frage, wie sich die Strukturen und der Ablauf von Tarifverhandlungen auf den Gender Wage Gap auswirken. Der vorliegende Beitrag geht dieser Frage anhand von Interviews mit Tarifexpertinnen und -experten von Arbeitgeberverbaenden und Gewerkschaften in vier Branchen nach. Die meisten Befragten sehen Tarifvertraege nicht als moegliche Quelle von Lohnunterschieden zwischen Maennern und Frauen an. Insgesamt schildern die Befragten auf der Ebene von Tarifverhandlungen auch nur bedingt Potential zur Verringerung der geschlechtsspezifischen Lohnluecke. Frauen sind den Aussagen nach in Entscheidungs- und vor allem in Verhandlungsgremien allerdings haeufig unterrepraesentiert. Ein Teil der Befragten ist der Auffassung, dass die bestehende Entgeltstruktur zu Lasten von frauendominierten Berufen geht. Veraenderungen bei der Arbeitsbewertung gelten jedoch aus verschiedenen Gruenden als schwierig. (Empirical studies indicate that the gender wage gap is lower under collectively negotiated contracts than in firms not bound by such contracts. However, it remains an open question as to how the organisation and the process of collective negotiations affect the gender wage gap. To shed light on this question, we conducted interviews with collective bargaining experts from employers' organisations and trade unions in four different industries. Most respondents did not consider collective agreements as a possible source of wage differences between men and women. Consequently, they saw only limited potential to reduce the gender pay gap at the level of collective bargaining. According to the interviewees, however, women were often under-represented in decision-making and especially in negotiating committees. Some of the respondents believed that the existing wage structure penalises female-dominated occupations. However, they named several reasons why a revised wage structure is difficult to implement.)

Suggested Citation

  • Gaertner, Debora & Grimm, Veronika & Lang, Julia & Stephan, Gesine, 2015. "Kollektive Lohnverhandlungen und der Gender Wage Gap: Befunde aus einer qualitativen Studie (Collective bargaining and the gender wage gap: Findings from a qualitative study)," Industrielle Beziehungen - Zeitschrift fuer Arbeit, Organisation und Management - The German Journal of Industrial Relations, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 22(3-4), pages 260-281.
  • Handle: RePEc:rai:indbez:doi:10.1688/indb-2015-03-gaertner
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/hampp_e-journals_IndB.htm#315
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    industrial relations; collective bargaining; gender wage gap; expert interviews;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J52 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation
    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J71 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Hiring and Firing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rai:indbez:doi:10.1688/indb-2015-03-gaertner. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rainer Hampp (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.