IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Quel taux d actualisation pour quel avenir ?

Listed author(s):
  • Christian Gollier

[eng] Which Discount Rate for Which Future? The choice of the discount rate raises a very simple question : do we prefer (1 + r)-t euro immediately or 1 euro in t years ? By introspection, one can guess that the answer to this question depends upon our expectations concerning our living standard in t years, and upon the certainty associated to it. In this paper, we clarify the economic content of the theory of the term structure of interest rates in order to build a normative theory of the discount rate. On this basis, we propose that the real discount rate be fixed at 5 % for time horizons less than 30 years. This proposal is based on the assumption that the economy will growth at a rate of 2 % per year during the period, with little uncertainty. However, the uncertainty is exacerbated for longer time horizon, which induces the socially efficient discount rate to decrease for a precautionary motive. Our calibrations lead to the recommendation of a real discount rate at 2,5 % to 3 % per year for time horizons around 100 years, and which asymptotically converges towards a rate around 1 to 2,5 % for the very distant future. [fre] Christian Gollier Quel taux d'actualisation pour quel avenir? Le choix du taux d'actualisation pose une question très simple : préférons- nous (/ + r)-t euro avec certitude tout de suite ou 1 euro avec certitude dans t années ? Par introspection, on devine que la réponse à cette question dépend de nos anticipations sur notre niveau de vie dans t années, et sur l'incertitude qui entoure cette espérance. Dans cet article, nous clarifions le contenu économique de la théorie classique de la structure par terme des taux d'intérêt pour construire un modèle normatif du taux d'actualisation. Sur cette base, nous militons pour un taux d'actualisation réel de 5 % par an pour des horizons temporels t inférieurs à 30 ans. Ce taux est basé sur l'hypothèse d'une croissance du PIB par habitant de 2 % par an et d'une incertitude faible sur cette croissance à cet horizon. Par contre, pour des horizons temporels plus éloignés, il faut tenir compte d'une forte augmentation de l'incertitude relative à la croissance économique. Nos calibrations nous conduisent à recommander un taux réel décroissant avec t, de 2,5 % à 3 % par an à un horizon de 100 ans, et convergeant autour de 1 à 2,5 % par an pour des horizons très éloignés.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue française d'économie.

Volume (Year): 19 (2005)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 59-81

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2005_num_19_4_1560
Note: DOI:10.3406/rfeco.2005.1560
Contact details of provider: Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Christian Gollier & Jean-Guy Devezeaux de Lavergne, 2001. "Analyse quantitative de la réversibilité du stockage des déchets nucléaires : valorisation des déchets," Economie & Prévision, La Documentation Française, vol. 149(3), pages 1-13.
  2. Gollier, Christian, 2002. "Discounting an uncertain future," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 149-166, August.
  3. Gollier, Christian, 2002. "Time Horizon and the Discount Rate," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 463-473, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2005_num_19_4_1560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.