IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_127_1_5837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entreprises et formation continue

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Delame
  • Francis Kramarz

Abstract

[fre] Entreprises et la formation continue par Emmanuel Delame et Francis Kramarz . La loi du 16 juillet 1971 institue la participation des entreprises d'au moins 10 salariés au financement de la formation continue. Si des entreprises (les plus grandes et les plus qualifiées) dépensent plus que le minimum légal ( 1 ,2 % de leur masse salariale en 1 987), d'autres versent cette somme à l'État ou à des organismes spécialisés sans former. Entre deux, il existe des entreprises qui forment en dépensant juste la somme minimale. . Cette étude, réalisée à partir de 495 entreprises industrielles, montre la constance des comportements de formation dans le temps (qui a formé formera, qui n'a formé a peu de chance de le faire un jour). Seules les entreprises très formatrices tirent leur épingle du jeu avec un meilleur profit et une productivité accrue pour le qualifié. [eng] Firms and In-Service Training by Emmanuel Delame and Francis Kramarz . The law of 16 July 1971 provides for firms of at least 10 employees to contribute to financing in-service training. Although the largest and most skilled firms spend more than the legal minimum (1.2% of their payroll in 1987), others pay this sum to the government or specialised organisations without spending anything on training. Between these two extremes are the firms that spend exactly the minimum sum on training. This study examines 495 industrial firms to show the consistency of training patterns over time (those that have trained will train and those that have not trained are unlikely to do so in the future). Only the firms that train a great deal play their game well with higher profit and increased productivity for the skilled worker.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Delame & Francis Kramarz, 1997. "Entreprises et formation continue," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 127(1), pages 63-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_127_1_5837
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1997.5837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1997.5837
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_127_1_5837
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nathalie Havet, 2006. "La valorisation salariale et professionnelle de la formation en entreprise diffère-t-elle selon le sexe ? L'exemple canadien," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 175(4), pages 147-161.
    2. Fougere, Denis & Kramarz, Francis & Magnac, Thierry, 2000. "Youth employment policies in France," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(4-6), pages 928-942, May.
    3. Lorraine Dearden & Howard Reed & John Van Reenen, 2006. "The Impact of Training on Productivity and Wages: Evidence from British Panel Data," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 68(4), pages 397-421, August.
    4. Abowd, John M. & Kramarz, Francis, 2003. "The costs of hiring and separations," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 499-530, October.
    5. Gérard Ballot & Fathi Fakhfakh & Erol Taymaz, 2002. "Who benefits from training and R&D: The firm or the workers? A study on panels of French and Swedish firms," ERC Working Papers 0201, ERC - Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Jan 2002.
    6. Ballot, Gerard & Fakhfakh, Fathi & Taymaz, Erol, 2001. "Firms' human capital, R&D and performance: a study on French and Swedish firms," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 443-462, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_127_1_5837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.