IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Entreprises et formation continue

Listed author(s):
  • Emmanuel Delame
  • Francis Kramarz

[fre] Entreprises et la formation continue par Emmanuel Delame et Francis Kramarz La loi du 16 juillet 1971 institue la participation des entreprises d'au moins 10 salariés au financement de la formation continue. Si des entreprises (les plus grandes et les plus qualifiées) dépensent plus que le minimum légal ( 1 ,2 % de leur masse salariale en 1 987), d'autres versent cette somme à l'État ou à des organismes spécialisés sans former. Entre deux, il existe des entreprises qui forment en dépensant juste la somme minimale. Cette étude, réalisée à partir de 495 entreprises industrielles, montre la constance des comportements de formation dans le temps (qui a formé formera, qui n'a formé a peu de chance de le faire un jour). Seules les entreprises très formatrices tirent leur épingle du jeu avec un meilleur profit et une productivité accrue pour le qualifié. [eng] Firms and In-Service Training by Emmanuel Delame and Francis Kramarz The law of 16 July 1971 provides for firms of at least 10 employees to contribute to financing in-service training. Although the largest and most skilled firms spend more than the legal minimum (1.2% of their payroll in 1987), others pay this sum to the government or specialised organisations without spending anything on training. Between these two extremes are the firms that spend exactly the minimum sum on training. This study examines 495 industrial firms to show the consistency of training patterns over time (those that have trained will train and those that have not trained are unlikely to do so in the future). Only the firms that train a great deal play their game well with higher profit and increased productivity for the skilled worker.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie & prévision.

Volume (Year): 127 (1997)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 63-82

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_127_1_5837
Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1997.5837
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1997_num_127_1_5837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.