IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/caecpo/cep_0154-8344_2001_num_38_1_1311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'histoire des théories économiques sous le prisme de l'hétérodoxie. Une analyse critique de l'Histoire de la pensée économique de Ghislain Deleplace

Author

Listed:
  • Michel De Vroey

Abstract

[fre] L'objectif de mon article est de critiquer certaines des thèses centrales de VHistoire de la pensée économique de Deleplace : en premier lieu, la thèse selon laquelle la théorie de la demande effective de Keynes fournit la clé de compréhension du chômage involontaire, en second lieu, la thèse selon laquelle une absorption de la 'macro' dans la 'micro' s'est produite, de Hicks à nos jours. [eng] The aim of this article is to criticize two claims made by Deleplace in his recent Histoire de la pensée économique. First, I criticize the widespread claim that effective demand deficiencies can explain the existence of involuntary unemployment. Second, I question Deleplace's account of the history of macroeconomics from Hicks to the present in terms of an absorption of macroeconomics into microeconomics.

Suggested Citation

  • Michel De Vroey, 2001. "L'histoire des théories économiques sous le prisme de l'hétérodoxie. Une analyse critique de l'Histoire de la pensée économique de Ghislain Deleplace," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(1), pages 115-133.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_2001_num_38_1_1311
    DOI: 10.3406/cep.2001.1311
    Note: DOI:10.3406/cep.2001.1311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/cep.2001.1311
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/cep_0154-8344_2001_num_38_1_1311
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/cep.2001.1311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Vroey, Michel, 1999. "The Marshallian Market and the Walrasian Economy. Two Incompatible Bedfellows," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 46(3), pages 319-338, August.
    2. Michel De Vroey, 1997. "Involuntary unemployment: the missing piece in Keynes's General Theory," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 258-283.
    3. Michel De Vroey, 1997. "Le concept de chômage involontaire : de Keynes aux nouveaux keynésiens," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 48(6), pages 1381-1408.
    4. Michael De Vroey, 2000. "IS-LM à la Hicks versus IS-LM à la Modigliani," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 293-316, Summer.
    5. Laidler,David, 1999. "Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521641739.
    6. Vroey, Michel De, 1999. "Keynes and the Marshall-Walras Divide," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 117-136, June.
    7. Michel De Vroey, 2001. "Friedman and Lucas on the Phillips Curve: From a Disequilibrium to an Equilibrium Approach," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 27(2), pages 127-148, Spring.
    8. Ragnar Frisch, 1950. "Alfred Marshall's Theory of Value," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 64(4), pages 495-524.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Béraud, Alain, 2003. "Keynes et Pigou sur le salaire monétaire et l’emploi : une synthèse du débat," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 79(1), pages 147-162, Mars-Juin.
    2. Michel De Vroey, 2004. "The History of Macroeconomics Viewed against the Background of the Marshall-Walras Divide," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 36(5), pages 57-91, Supplemen.
    3. Michel De Vroey, 2002. "The history of economic thought: the French way," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 672-687.
    4. Michel De Vroey, 2004. "Lucas on involuntary unemployment," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 28(3), pages 397-411, May.
    5. Michel De Vroey, 2000. "Marshall on equilibrium and time: a reconstruction," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 245-269.
    6. Michel De Vroey, 2007. "Did The Market‐Clearing Postulate Pre‐Exist New Classical Economics? The Case Of Marshallian Theory," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 75(3), pages 328-348, June.
    7. Rancan, Antonella, 2012. "Modigliani's 1944 Wage Rigidity Assumption and the Construction of the Neoclassical Synthesis," Economics & Statistics Discussion Papers esdp12069, University of Molise, Department of Economics.
    8. Christophe Lavialle, 2001. "L'épistémologie de Keynes et "l'hypothèse Wittgenstein" : La cohérence logique de la Théorie Générale de l'emploi, de l'intérêt et de la monnaie," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(1), pages 25-64.
    9. Goulven Rubin, 2004. "Patinkin on IS-LM: An Alternative to Modigliani," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 36(5), pages 190-216, Supplemen.
    10. Siven, Claes-Henric, 2000. "Analytical Foundations of Erik Lindahl's Monetary Analysis, 1924-30," Research Papers in Economics 2000:14, Stockholm University, Department of Economics.
    11. Thomas M. Humphrey, 2000. "Monetary policy frameworks and indicators for the Federal Reserve in the 1920s," Working Paper 00-07, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
    12. Haavio, Markus & Mendicino, Caterina & Punzi, Maria Teresa, 2013. "Financial and economic downturns in OECD countries," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 35/2013, Bank of Finland.
    13. Michel De Vroey, 1997. "Le concept de chômage involontaire : de Keynes aux nouveaux keynésiens," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 48(6), pages 1381-1408.
    14. Neil Hart, 2003. "Marshall’s Dilemma: Equilibrium versus Evolution," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1139-1160, December.
    15. Michel De Vroey, 2005. "Marshall versus Walras on Equilibrium and Time," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2005047, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques.
    16. Thomas M. Humphrey, 2004. "Alfred Marshall and the quantity theory of money," Working Paper 04-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
    17. Alessandro Vercelli, 2010. "Economy and economics: the twin crises," Department of Economic Policy, Finance and Development (DEPFID) University of Siena 0410, Department of Economic Policy, Finance and Development (DEPFID), University of Siena.
    18. Annamaria Simonazzi & Fernando Vianello, 2005. "Price and Prejudice. The statics and dynamics of money-wage flexibility," Working Papers in Public Economics 86, University of Rome La Sapienza, Department of Economics and Law.
    19. David Laidler & William B.P. Robson, 2004. "Two Percent Target: The Context, Theory, and Practice of Canadian Monetary Policy since 1991," C.D. Howe Institute Policy Studies, C.D. Howe Institute, number 20041, January.
    20. David Laidler, 2010. "Chicago Monetary Traditions," Chapters, in: Ross B. Emmett (ed.), The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_2001_num_38_1_1311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/cep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.