IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlsev/v2014y2014i2id105p3-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Institutionalism in Europeanization Research: Positivist or Scientific Realist Metatheory Synthesis?
[Nový institucionalismus ve výzkumu europeizace: pozitivistická nebo vědecko-realistická metateoretická syntéza?]

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Poruba

Abstract

Combination of europeanization and arguments of rational, sociological (constructivist) and historical institutionalism has become an important and frequently used part of research. To include all three approaches in a coherent research framework is however not axiomatic, as namely rationalism and constructivism are theories arising from different premises. Aim of the introduced text is to open a debate about compatibility og these concepts and to offer alternatives on how new institutionalism theories can be reflected and synthesized on metatheoretical level within one research. Apart from positivist position prevailing in practical research, a possible dialogue of theories based on scientific realism viewpoint will be introduced. Conclusion hereof is not the argument that one way of integration is more suitable than others but a claim that appropriate attention should be drawn to this seemingly abstract part of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Poruba, 2014. "New Institutionalism in Europeanization Research: Positivist or Scientific Realist Metatheory Synthesis? [Nový institucionalismus ve výzkumu europeizace: pozitivistická nebo vědecko-realistická met," Současná Evropa, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(2), pages 3-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlsev:v:2014:y:2014:i:2:id:105:p:3-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wep.vse.cz/artkey/sev-201402-0001_Novy-institucionalismus-ve-vyzkumu-europeizace-pozitivisticka-nebo-vedecko-realisticka-metateoreticka-synteza.php
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://wep.vse.cz/pdfs/sev/2014/02/01.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendt, Alexander E., 1987. "The agent-structure problem in international relations theory," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 335-370, July.
    2. Theofanis Exadaktylos & Claudio M. Radaelli, 2009. "Research Design in European Studies: The Case of Europeanization," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 507-530, June.
    3. Knill, Christoph & Tosun, Jale, 2009. "Post-accession transposition of EU law in the new member states: a cross-country comparison," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 13, December.
    4. Theofanis Exadaktylos & Claudio M. Radaelli, 2009. "Research Design in European Studies: The Case of Europeanization," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 507-530, June.
    5. Sedelmeier, Ulrich, . "Europeanisation in new member and candidate states," Living Reviews in European Governance (LREG), Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Budde & Mathias Großklaus, 2011. "Patterns of Power. The EU‘s External Steering Techniques at Work - The Case of Democratization Policies in Morocco," KFG Working Papers p0022, Free University Berlin.
    2. Sascha Zirra, 2010. "The Bounded Creativity of Domestic Appropriation Explaining Selective Flexicurity in Continental Countries," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 2, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    3. Krzysztof Wach & Agnieszka Głodowska & Marek Maciejewski & Marek Sieja, 2021. "Europeanization Processes of the EU Energy Policy in Visegrad Countries in the Years 2005–2018," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Philipp Trein & Manuel Fischer & Martino Maggetti & Francesco Sarti, 2023. "Empirical research on policy integration: a review and new directions," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(1), pages 29-48, March.
    5. Claudiu Cicea & Carmen Nadia Ciocoiu & Corina Marinescu, 2021. "Exploring the Research Regarding Energy–Economic Growth Relationship," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Annette Elisabeth Töller, 2010. "Measuring and Comparing the Europeanization of National Legislation: A Research Note," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(2), pages 417-444, March.
    7. Zoltán GRÜNHUT, 2017. "Concepts, approaches and methods on europeanisation – a meta-analysis," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8, pages 157-176, June.
    8. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    9. George Kyris, 2013. "Europeanization beyond Contested Statehood: The European Union and Turkish-Cypriot Civil Society," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 866-883, September.
    10. Kaplan Yilmaz, 2017. "China’s OBOR as a Geo-Functional Institutionalist Project," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 7-23, June.
    11. Roxana Bobulescu, 2011. "Critical Realism versus Social Constructivism in International Relations," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 37-64, May.
    12. Lukas Hermwille & Lisa Sanderink, 2019. "Make Fossil Fuels Great Again? The Paris Agreement, Trump, and the USFossil Fuel Industry," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(4), pages 45-62, November.
    13. Dan Marek & Michael Baun & Marcin DÄ…browski, 2017. "The challenge of implementing European Union environmental law in the new member states: The Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive in the Czech Republic and Poland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(6), pages 1117-1135, September.
    14. Janina Grabs & Graeme Auld & Benjamin Cashore, 2021. "Private regulation, public policy, and the perils of adverse ontological selection," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1183-1208, October.
    15. Marella Bodur Ün & Harun Arıkan, 2022. "Europeanization and De‐Europeanization of Turkey's Gender Equality Policy: The Case of the Istanbul Convention," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 945-962, July.
    16. Marcin Dabrowski, 2011. "Partnership in implementation of the Structural Funds in Poland: 'shallow' adjustment or internalization of the European mode of cooperative governance?," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 5, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    17. Aura Parmentier Cajaiba & Giovany Cajaiba Santana, 2014. "Routines and Networks: Strengthening a Missed Link," GREDEG Working Papers 2014-41, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    18. Asya Zhelyazkova & Nikoleta Yordanova, 2015. "Signalling ‘compliance’: The link between notified EU directive implementation and infringement cases," European Union Politics, , vol. 16(3), pages 408-428, September.
    19. Kilian Spandler, 2018. "Regional standards of membership and enlargement in the EU and ASEAN," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 183-198, June.
    20. Boryslav Brekhov, 2016. "Demokratischer Wirtschaftsfrieden," Potsdam Economic Papers 05, Universität Potsdam, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlsev:v:2014:y:2014:i:2:id:105:p:3-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.