IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v8y2020p303-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smart mobility: a comparison between the social media strategies for the public urban mobility services of Rome and Bucharest

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Christina SUCIU

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Faculty of Theoretical and Applied Economics, Economics and Economic Policies Department, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marco SAVASTANO

    (Sapienza University of Rome, Faculty of Economics, Management Department, Rome, Italy)

  • Gheorghe Alexandru STATIVA

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Irina GORELOVA

    (Sapienza University of Rome, Faculty of Economics, Management Department, Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The rapid development of cities, along with the growth of urban population, has brought up many challenges for the organization of human urban mobility in the most sustainable and smart way. The high need for modern arrangements of citizens movement leads to the necessity for searching alternative solutions to develop urban transportation systems and increase satisfaction of passengers, as well as modern and user-friendly social channels to provide always updated and useful information to citizens and visitors, at any time and in any place it is required. Objectives The main objective of the paper is to analyze to what extend social media platforms stand in as a communication tool for public transportation companies and increase engagement of passengers to the process of mobility systems development, making them active members of a community of information consumers and producers. Prior work The role of social media platforms in urban mobility and the level of satisfaction of citizens with urban mobility services was recently studied by several scholars. However, such a comparative study on two European capital cities concerning this specific topic of interest lacks in the existing literature. Approach This paper presents a comparative analysis concerning the social media strategies of public transportation companies in the urban environment. Empirical analysis is based on two case studies shedding light on the level of development and engagement of passengers on social media platforms in Rome and Bucharest. For this comparison, the collected data were analysed through the SWOT analysis tool in order to clearly highlight the findings and compare the results. Results Our evidence shows that social media platforms should be used by transportation companies to provide two-way communication and use a customers feedback as a source for continuous improvement of services and facilities, to be in line with citizens demands and technology providers. Moreover, beneficiaries being interested to identify a higher level of responsibility. Implications The rapid growth of social media platforms creates various possible future scenarios for the customers involvement. Certain gaps in the development of social media strategies in these two cities can become a possible direction for their further evolution in the scientific research as well as for policy making practices. Value The analysis of social media platforms has shown the main growth points for further development of smart mobility in Rome and Bucharest.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Christina SUCIU & Marco SAVASTANO & Gheorghe Alexandru STATIVA & Irina GORELOVA, 2020. "Smart mobility: a comparison between the social media strategies for the public urban mobility services of Rome and Bucharest," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 8, pages 303-320, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:8:y:2020:p:303-320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/343/308
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/343
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vito Albino & Umberto Berardi & Rosa Maria Dangelico, 2015. "Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 3-21, January.
    2. Clara Benevolo & Renata Paola Dameri & Beatrice D’Auria, 2016. "Smart Mobility in Smart City," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Teresina Torre & Alessio Maria Braccini & Riccardo Spinelli (ed.), Empowering Organizations, edition 1, pages 13-28, Springer.
    3. Ainhoa Serna & Tomas Ruiz & Jon Kepa Gerrikagoitia & Rosa Arroyo, 2019. "Identification of Enablers and Barriers for Public Bike Share System Adoption using Social Media and Statistical Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Moradi, Afsaneh & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2018. "A multi-level perspective analysis of urban mobility system dynamics: What are the future transition pathways?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 231-243.
    5. Uroš Kramar & Dejan Dragan & Darja Topolšek, 2019. "The Holistic Approach to Urban Mobility Planning with a Modified Focus Group, SWOT, and Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    6. Jana Zscheischler & Sebastian Rogga & Thomas Weith, 2014. "Experiences with Transdisciplinary Research," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 751-756, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anthea van der Hoogen & Ifeoluwapo Fashoro & Andre P. Calitz & Lamla Luke, 2024. "A Digital Transformation Framework for Smart Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Pamučar, Dragan & Durán-Romero, Gemma & Yazdani, Morteza & López, Ana M., 2023. "A decision analysis model for smart mobility system development under circular economy approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Parul Gupta & Sumedha Chauhan & M. P. Jaiswal, 2019. "Classification of Smart City Research - a Descriptive Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 661-685, June.
    4. Kfir Noy & Moshe Givoni, 2018. "Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Jules Muvuna & Tuleen Boutaleb & Slobodan B. Mickovski & Keith Baker & Ghoreyshi Seyed Mohammad & Mario Cools & Wissal Selmi, 2020. "Information Integration in a Smart City System—A Case Study on Air Pollution Removal by Green Infrastructure through a Vehicle Smart Routing System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Li Zhao & Zhi-ying Tang & Xin Zou, 2019. "Mapping the Knowledge Domain of Smart-City Research: A Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-28, November.
    7. Francisco Maciá Pérez & José Vicente Berna Martínez & Iren Lorenzo Fonseca, 2021. "Modelling and Implementing Smart Universities: An IT Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Andrea Ciacci & Enrico Ivaldi & Reyes González-Relaño, 2021. "A Partially Non-Compensatory Method to Measure the Smart and Sustainable Level of Italian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Vecchio, Pasquale Del & Secundo, Giustina & Maruccia, Ylenia & Passiante, Giuseppina, 2019. "A system dynamic approach for the smart mobility of people: Implications in the age of big data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow & Monika Wawer & Anna Głowacz, 2023. "Energy-Efficient City Transportation Solutions in the Context of Energy-Conserving and Mobility Behaviours of Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, August.
    12. Guido Perboli & Mariangela Rosano, 2020. "A Taxonomic Analysis of Smart City Projects in North America and Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Koutra, Sesil & Becue, Vincent & Ioakimidis, Christos S., 2019. "Searching for the ‘smart’ definition through its spatial approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 924-936.
    14. Francesco Pinna & Francesca Masala & Chiara Garau, 2017. "Urban Policies and Mobility Trends in Italian Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Iqbal Yulizar Mukti & Yudha Prambudia, 2018. "Challenges in Governing the Digital Transportation Ecosystem in Jakarta: A Research Direction in Smart City Frameworks," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, March.
    16. Rodolfo Metulini & Maurizio Carpita, 2021. "A Spatio-Temporal Indicator for City Users Based on Mobile Phone Signals and Administrative Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 761-781, August.
    17. Huaxiong Jiang & Stan Geertman & Patrick Witte, 2021. "Smartening urban governance: An evidence‐based perspective," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 744-758, June.
    18. Richter, Maximilian A. & Hagenmaier, Markus & Bandte, Oliver & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim, 2022. "Smart cities, urban mobility and autonomous vehicles: How different cities needs different sustainable investment strategies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Roblek Vasja & Meško Maja & Podbregar Iztok, 2021. "Mapping of the Emergence of Society 5.0: A Bibliometric Analysis," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 54(4), pages 293-305, December.
    20. Humberto, Mateus & Moura, Filipe & Giannotti, Mariana, 2020. "Incorporating children's views and perceptions about urban mobility," OSF Preprints yjxfm, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    smart city; smart mobility; sustainable urban development; social media platforms; innovative business models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:8:y:2020:p:303-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.