IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/procee/v7y2019p27-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The missing coordinates of the sharing economy: Intellectual capital and intergenerational learning

Author

Listed:
  • Ramona–Diana LEON

    (National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Objectives:This research aims to analyze the role of intellectual capital and intergenerational learning in the contemporary sharing economy. Prior work:The concept of intellectual capital has its roots in the work of Machlup (1962) and was coined by J.K. Galbraith (1969) who used it in order to describe the behavior of using brain and not just knowledge and mere intelligence. Although remarkable signs of progress have been made, this field is still in an embryonic stage of development. Despite the fact that the perspective switched from the organizational to the regional and national intellectual capital, there is no generally accepted framework regarding its components; these become highly important in the context of the sharing economy which manages to connect people, communities and organizations from various continents. Besides, in light of the faster technological progress and the development of smart communities and cities, the knowledge loss generated by the aging population seems to be neglected. Approach:An etic approach is employed which encompasses an external view on meaning associations and real-world events. Results:The results emphasize the link between intergenerational learning and intellectual capital, and highlight their contribution to the development of the sharing economy. Implications:These findings have both theoretical and practical implications; on the one hand, they extend the literature from the knowledge management field by emphasizing the nexus between age diversity and competitiveness in the sharing economy. On the other hand, it may serve as a handbook of policy-decision guidelines; it brings forward how the intergenerational learning programs and practices can be used for increasing the organizational and national intellectual capital. Value:It generates insightful knowledge on how to develop organizational and national intellectual capital through intergenerational learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramona–Diana LEON, 2019. "The missing coordinates of the sharing economy: Intellectual capital and intergenerational learning," Smart Cities International Conference (SCIC) Proceedings, Smart-EDU Hub, vol. 7, pages 27-36, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:7:y:2019:p:27-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/299/263
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.scrd.eu/index.php/scic/article/view/299
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bilgehan Uzunca & Andrea Borlenghi, 2019. "Regulation strictness and supply in the platform economy: the case of Airbnb and Couchsurfing," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 920-942, September.
    2. Yogesh Malhotra, 2000. "Knowledge Assets in the Global Economy: Assessment of National Intellectual Capital," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 8(3), pages 5-15, July.
    3. Livio Cricelli & Marco Greco & Michele Grimaldi, 2014. "An overall index of intellectual capital," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(10), pages 880-901, September.
    4. Kianto, Aino & Sáenz, Josune & Aramburu, Nekane, 2017. "Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 11-20.
    5. Ramona Diana Leon, 2016. "Intellectual capital - source of competitiveness," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2/3), pages 149-166.
    6. Niemimaa, Marko & Järveläinen, Jonna & Heikkilä, Marikka & Heikkilä, Jukka, 2019. "Business continuity of business models: Evaluating the resilience of business models for contingencies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 208-216.
    7. Renata Kaminska & Stefano Borzillo, 2018. "Challenges to the learning organization in the context of generational diversity and social networks," Post-Print hal-01793376, HAL.
    8. Hong, Ji Hyun & Kim, Byung Cho & Park, Kyung Sam, 2019. "Optimal risk management for the sharing economy with stranger danger and service quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 1024-1035.
    9. Livio Cricelli & Marco Greco & Michele Grimaldi, 2014. "An overall index of intellectual capital," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(10), pages 880-901, September.
    10. Yongfu Li & Yu Song & Jinxin Wang & Chengwei Li, 2019. "Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Chinese Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qing’e Wang & Luwei Zhao & Alice Chang-Richards & Yuanyuan Zhang & Hujun Li, 2021. "Understanding the Impact of Social Capital on the Innovation Performance of Construction Enterprises: Based on the Mediating Effect of Knowledge Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Ramona - Diana LEON, 2017. "Measuring the Knowledge Economy: A National and Organizational Perspective," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 227-249, June.
    3. Qing Li & Long Hai Vo, 2021. "Intangible Capital and Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Vietnamese Enterprises," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 21-02, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    4. Michael Yao-Ping Peng & Li Zhang & Meng-Hsiu Lee & Fang-Yih Hsu & Yan Xu & Yuan He, 2024. "The relationship between strategic human resource management, green innovation and environmental performance: a moderated-mediation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Wilder Quintero-Quintero & Ana Beatriz Blanco-Ariza & Manuel Alfonso Garzón-Castrillón, 2021. "Intellectual Capital: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Ana Batlles-delaFuente & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda & Emilio Abad-Segura, 2021. "Sustainable Business Model in the Product-Service System: Analysis of Global Research and Associated EU Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-33, September.
    7. Sun, Xiuli & Li, Haizheng & Ghosal, Vivek, 2020. "Firm-level human capital and innovation: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    8. Evgeny V. Popov & Wadim Strielkowski & Maksim V. Vlasov, 2020. "Digitalization of intellectual activity in Russian regions," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 24-32, March.
    9. Tedds, Lindsay M. & Cameron, Anna & Khanal, Mukesh & Crisan, Daria, 2021. "Why Existing Regulatory Frameworks Fail in the Short-term Rental Market: Exploring the Role of Regulatory Fractures," MPRA Paper 106712, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Ma, Shuang & Cui, Xuebin & Xiao, Xiaohong & Zhao, Xiaonan, 2022. "The impact of photo verification service on sales performance in the peer-to-peer economy: Moderating role of customer uncertainty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 45-55.
    11. Mehmet Güney Celbiş & Pui-Hang Wong & Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "Innovativeness, Work Flexibility, and Place Characteristics: A Spatial Econometric and Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-29, December.
    12. Abdul Waheed & Xiaoming Miao & Salma Waheed & Naveed Ahmad & Abdul Majeed, 2019. "How New HRM Practices, Organizational Innovation, and Innovative Climate Affect the Innovation Performance in the IT Industry: A Moderated-Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Yu Zhou & Guangjian Liu & Xiaoxi Chang & Ying Hong, 2021. "Top-down, bottom-up or outside-in? An examination of triadic mechanisms on firm innovation in Chinese firms," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(1), pages 131-162, February.
    14. Suhaib Ahmad & Abdurrahman Adamu Pantamee & Syed Moin-ud-Din Shah, 2020. "The Role of Human Resource Management Practices on Palm Oil Firm’s Performance in Malaysia with Mediating Role of Organizational Learning Capabilities and Moderating Role of Organizational Support," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 2(1), pages 22-33, June.
    15. Viktorija Petrov & Đorđe Ćelić & Zorica Uzelac & Zoran Drašković, 2020. "Three pillars of knowledge management in SMEs: evidence from Serbia," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 417-438, June.
    16. Barrena-Martínez, Jesús & Cricelli, Livio & Ferrándiz, Esther & Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele, 2020. "Joint forces: Towards an integration of intellectual capital theory and the open innovation paradigm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 261-270.
    17. Zheng, Lu & Ulrich, Klaus & Sendra-García, Javier, 2021. "Qualitative comparative analysis: Configurational paths to innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 83-93.
    18. Lucía Muñoz-Pascual & Jesús Galende, 2020. "Ambidextrous Knowledge and Learning Capability: The Magic Potion for Employee Creativity and Sustainable Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, May.
    19. Yuqiu Lu & Guowei Li & Zhe Luo & Muhammad Anwar & Yunju Zhang, 2021. "Does Intellectual Capital Spur Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Growth?: A Study of Chinese and Pakistani Firms," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    20. María Dolores García-Gallo & Félix Jiménez-Naharro & Miguel Torres-García & Susan L. Giesecke & José Guadix-Martín, 2020. "Incorporation of the Intangibles into the Spanish Start-Ups by Activity Sector and Region. Improving Their Economic Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    human capital; age diversity; technology; knowledge;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:procee:v:7:y:2019:p:27-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.