IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pstr00/0000060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing risks and opportunities for tropical forests in the face of sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Jamie A Carr
  • Dominick V Spracklen
  • Daisy Brasington
  • Ivan V Canosa
  • Luana Fagundes
  • Tainan Messina
  • Susannah M Sallu

Abstract

Understanding how countries’ future development pathways could affect forests can help to avoid negative impacts and instead promote positive ones. Exploring this topic requires knowledge of which areas of the development agenda are likely to show the greatest progress, and how these expected changes relate to the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation that are currently affecting forests, or which may emerge as result of development-related changes. Based on this information, researchers, stakeholders and decisionmakers can engage in discussions to inform further research and interventions. We present an assessment framework that draws upon a range of data types to identify specific components of the development agenda that are likely to be of greatest relevance to forest conservation at the national level. We then assess the potential magnitude and likelihood of imminent changes in these areas over the short- to medium-term. We use this framework to assess 48 tropical countries, providing insights into the areas of sustainable development that are most likely to provide risks, opportunities or enabling conditions for forest conservation across much of the tropics. Our findings suggest that, across much of the tropics, ongoing risks to forests associated with agriculture, transport infrastructure and urban infrastructure could worsen, and that new risks from energy infrastructure could emerge. Opportunities relating to poverty reduction, tourism, and industry, among others, will require care to ensure that associated progress results in positive rather than negative forest impacts. Enabling conditions associated with, inter alia, improved education, inclusive decision-making, and effective governance, still have much room for improvement, and the anticipated likelihood of imminent progress in these areas varies between countries and regions. We discuss the implications of our findings for policymakers and development agencies, and consider potential future applications of our assessment protocol.Author summary: Forest conservation is a global priority that is affected by interactions with other areas of human progress. Some aspects of human development can hinder forest conservation, others can help to facilitate it, and yet others can have mixed (i.e. positive and/or negative) implications. For 48 tropical countries, we consider 24 Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets with previously documented implications for forest conservation. For each, we assess the amount of remaining progress to be made (a proxy for magnitude of potential impacts), and the likelihood that imminent progress will actually occur. We highlight agriculture and infrastructure as areas likely to exacerbate ongoing (or cause emerging) risks; poverty reduction, tourism and industry as areas that could provide mixed outcomes; and clean fuels, agricultural employment, migration management and settlement planning as areas that require greater efforts to ensure that forest conservation efforts are as effective as possible. However, as our findings vary between countries, we encourage national-level interpretation of our results to develop context-specific policies. This work is among the first efforts to assess potential SDG-forest interactions in an easy-to-interpret manner, and can aid policymakers to consider the forest-specific implications of anticipated national development trajectories, and to act accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamie A Carr & Dominick V Spracklen & Daisy Brasington & Ivan V Canosa & Luana Fagundes & Tainan Messina & Susannah M Sallu, 2023. "Assessing risks and opportunities for tropical forests in the face of sustainable development," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(5), pages 1-31, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000060
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000060
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pstr.0000060&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carr, Jamie A. & Petrokofsky, Gillian & Spracklen, Dominick V. & Lewis, Simon L. & Roe, Dilys & Trull, Nicholas & Vidal, Adriana & Wicander, Sylvia & Worthington-Hill, John & Sallu, Susannah M., 2021. "Anticipated impacts of achieving SDG targets on forests - a review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Yiwen Zeng & Sean Maxwell & Rebecca K. Runting & Oscar Venter & James E. M. Watson & L. Roman Carrasco, 2020. "Environmental destruction not avoided with the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 795-798, October.
    3. Lorenzo Di Lucia & Raphael Slade & Jamil Khan, 2022. "Decision-making fitness of methods to understand Sustainable Development Goal interactions," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(2), pages 131-138, February.
    4. World Bank, 2020. "Benin Country Forest Note [Note sur les forêts du Bénin]," World Bank Publications - Reports 34437, The World Bank Group.
    5. Divya Narain & Martine Maron & Hoong Chen Teo & Karen Hussey & Alex Mark Lechner, 2020. "Best-practice biodiversity safeguards for Belt and Road Initiative’s financiers," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 650-657, August.
    6. María D. Álvarez, 2001. "Could Peace be Worse than War for Colombia's Forests?," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 305-315, December.
    7. Godoy, Ricardo & Contreras, Manuel, 2001. "A Comparative Study of Education and Tropical Deforestation among Lowland Bolivian Amerindians: Forest Values, Environmental Externality, and School Subsidies," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(3), pages 555-574, April.
    8. Wunder, Sven, 2001. "Poverty Alleviation and Tropical Forests--What Scope for Synergies?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1817-1833, November.
    9. Naughton-Treves, Lisa & Wendland, Kelly, 2014. "Land Tenure and Tropical Forest Carbon Management," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-6.
    10. Linwood H. Pendleton & E. Lance Howe, 2002. "Market Integration, Development, and Smallholder Forest Clearance," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 78(1), pages 1-19.
    11. Julia Hussein & Jacqueline Bell & Maureen Dar Iang & Natasha Mesko & Jenny Amery & Wendy Graham, 2011. "An Appraisal of the Maternal Mortality Decline in Nepal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-10, May.
    12. Iñaki Permanyer & Jeroen Smits, 2020. "Inequality in Human Development across the Globe," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 46(3), pages 583-601, September.
    13. Holland, Margaret B. & de Koning, Free & Morales, Manuel & Naughton-Treves, Lisa & Robinson, Brian E. & Suárez, Luis, 2014. "Complex Tenure and Deforestation: Implications for Conservation Incentives in the Ecuadorian Amazon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 21-36.
    14. Alemagi, Dieudonne & Kozak, Robert A., 2010. "Illegal logging in Cameroon: Causes and the path forward," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(8), pages 554-561, October.
    15. Lisa Cameron & Diana Contreras Suarez & Katy Cornwell, 2019. "Understanding the determinants of maternal mortality: An observational study using the Indonesian Population Census," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Bali Swain, Ranjula & Ranganathan, Shyam, 2021. "Modeling interlinkages between sustainable development goals using network analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Tatiana Cristina de Castro & Antonio Carlos Castro & Leonardo Silva Soares & Marcelo Henrique Lopes Silva & Helen Roberta Silva Ferreira & James Werllen de Jesus Azevedo & Victor Lamarao de Franca, 2017. "Social and Environmental Impacts on Rural Communities Residing Near the Industrial Complex of Sao Luis Island, State of Maranhão, Brazil," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(2), pages 249-249, March.
    18. Michael Hübler, 2017. "How to curb poverty-related deforestation?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 374-380, March.
    19. Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki & Jenniver Sehring & Maria Brockhaus & Monica Di Gregorio, 2014. "Enabling factors for establishing REDD+ in a context of weak governance," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 167-186, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoshito Takasaki, 2011. "Economic models of shifting cultivation: a review," Tsukuba Economics Working Papers 2011-006, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tsukuba.
    2. Yoshito Takasaki & Oliver T. Coomes & Christian Abizaid & Stéphanie Brisson, 2014. "An Efficient Nonmarket Institution under Imperfect Markets: Labor Sharing for Tropical Forest Clearing," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(3), pages 711-732.
    3. Mamo, Getachew & Sjaastad, Espen & Vedeld, Pal, 2007. "Economic dependence on forest resources: A case from Dendi District, Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(8), pages 916-927, May.
    4. Sarker, Pradip Kumar & Fischer, Richard & Tamayo, Fabian & Navarrete, Bolier Torres & Günter, Sven, 2022. "Analyzing forest policy mixes based on the coherence of policies and the consistency of legislative policy instruments: A case study from Ecuador," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Kamanga, Penjani & Vedeld, Paul & Sjaastad, Espen, 2009. "Forest incomes and rural livelihoods in Chiradzulu District, Malawi," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 613-624, January.
    6. Fischer, Richard & Tamayo Cordero, Fabian & Ojeda Luna, Tatiana & Ferrer Velasco, Rubén & DeDecker, Maria & Torres, Bolier & Giessen, Lukas & Günter, Sven, 2021. "Interplay of governance elements and their effects on deforestation in tropical landscapes: Quantitative insights from Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. McCall, Michael K., 2016. "Beyond “Landscape” in REDD+: The Imperative for “Territory”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 58-72.
    8. Putraditama, Andika & Kim, Yeon-Su & Sánchez Meador, Andrew Joel, 2019. "Community forest management and forest cover change in Lampung, Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Rita Nerland & Heidi Rapp Nilsen & Bjørn Andersen, 2023. "Biosphere‐based sustainability in local governments: Sustainable development goal interactions and indicators for policymaking," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 39-55, February.
    10. Carr, Jamie A. & Petrokofsky, Gillian & Spracklen, Dominick V. & Lewis, Simon L. & Roe, Dilys & Trull, Nicholas & Vidal, Adriana & Wicander, Sylvia & Worthington-Hill, John & Sallu, Susannah M., 2021. "Anticipated impacts of achieving SDG targets on forests - a review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Babigumira, Ronnie & Angelsen, Arild & Buis, Maarten & Bauch, Simone & Sunderland, Terry & Wunder, Sven, 2014. "Forest Clearing in Rural Livelihoods: Household-Level Global-Comparative Evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 67-79.
    12. Bram Büscher, 2010. "Seeking ‘Telos’ in the ‘Transfrontier’? Neoliberalism and the Transcending of Community Conservation in Southern Africa," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(3), pages 644-660, March.
    13. Shackleton, C.M. & Garekae, H. & Sardeshpande, M. & Sinasson Sanni, G. & Twine, W.C., 2024. "Non-timber forest products as poverty traps: Fact or fiction?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. repec:plo:pone00:0189463 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Clements, Tom & Suon, Seng & Wilkie, David S. & Milner-Gulland, E.J., 2014. "Impacts of Protected Areas on Local Livelihoods in Cambodia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 125-134.
    16. Malerba, Daniele, 2020. "Poverty alleviation and local environmental degradation: An empirical analysis in Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Gregory S. Amacher & Erkki Koskela & Markku Ollikainen, 2004. "Deforestation, Production Intensity and Land Use under Insecure Property Rights," CESifo Working Paper Series 1128, CESifo.
    18. Veronesi, Marcella & Reutemann, Tim & Zabel, Astrid & Engel, Stefanie, 2015. "Designing REDD+ schemes when forest users are not forest landowners: Evidence from a survey-based experiment in Kenya," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 46-57.
    19. Sims, Katharine R.E., 2010. "Conservation and development: Evidence from Thai protected areas," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 94-114, September.
    20. Antoine Leblois, 2021. "Mitigating the impact of bad rainy seasons in poor agricultural regions to tackle deforestation," Post-Print hal-03111007, HAL.
    21. Pablo Aragonés‐Beltrán & Mª. Carmen González‐Cruz & Astrid León‐Camargo & Rosario Viñoles‐Cebolla, 2023. "Assessment of regional development needs according to criteria based on the Sustainable Development Goals in the Meta Region (Colombia)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1101-1121, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pstr00:0000060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: sustaintransform (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/sustainabilitytransformation/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.