IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0340383.html

Digital finance and climate risk information disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Hang Ren
  • Jianzhong Huang
  • Jinxin Ren

Abstract

Under the dual drivers of China’s “Dual Carbon” goals (carbon peaking and carbon neutrality) and the digital technology revolution, the strategic value of corporate climate risk information disclosure has become increasingly prominent. Against this backdrop, this paper systematically explores the relationship between digital finance development and corporate climate risk disclosure using a sample of Chinese A-share listed firms. The research demonstrates that digital finance development significantly promotes corporate climate risk disclosure, a conclusion that remains valid after multiple robustness tests. The study also reveals that digital finance drives climate risk disclosure through alleviating financing constraints, strengthening environmental responsibility, and enhancing reputational incentives. Further analysis indicates that institutional pressure positively moderates the relationship between digital finance and corporate climate risk disclosure; moreover, the impact of digital finance on corporate climate risk disclosure exhibits significant heterogeneity depending on regional factors (rule of law environments and the supply level of digital economy policies), and corporate characteristics (top management backgrounds, lifecycle stages, and equity nature). These findings provide theoretical references and empirical support for balancing digital finance innovation and climate risk governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hang Ren & Jianzhong Huang & Jinxin Ren, 2026. "Digital finance and climate risk information disclosure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-28, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340383
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0340383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340383
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0340383&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0340383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isil Erel & Léa H Stern & Chenhao Tan & Michael S Weisbach, 2021. "Selecting Directors Using Machine Learning," NBER Chapters, in: Big Data: Long-Term Implications for Financial Markets and Firms, pages 3226-3264, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Admati, Anat R & Pfleiderer, Paul, 2000. "Forcing Firms to Talk: Financial Disclosure Regulation and Externalities," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 13(3), pages 479-519.
    3. Bingler, Julia Anna & Kraus, Mathias & Leippold, Markus & Webersinke, Nicolas, 2024. "How cheap talk in climate disclosures relates to climate initiatives, corporate emissions, and reputation risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michalski, Lachlan & Low, Rand Kwong Yew, 2024. "Determinants of corporate credit ratings: Does ESG matter?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Breuer, Matthias, 2017. "How Does Financial-Reporting Regulation Affect Market-Wide Resource Allocation?," Working Papers 270, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    3. Paugam, Luc, 2011. "Valorisation et reporting du goodwill : enjeux théoriques et empiriques," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/8007 edited by Casta, Jean-François.
    4. Guttentag Michael, 2007. "Accuracy Enhancement, Agency Costs, and Disclosure Regulation," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 611-641, December.
    5. Kenton K. Yee, 2006. "Earnings Quality and the Equity Risk Premium: A Benchmark Model," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 833-877, September.
    6. Viral V. Acharya & Peter DeMarzo & Ilan Kremer, 2011. "Endogenous Information Flows and the Clustering of Announcements," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(7), pages 2955-2979, December.
    7. Hu, Zinan & Borjigin, Sumuya, 2025. "Climate information disclosure quality and systemic risk in the U.S. banking industry," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Alvarez, Fernando & Barlevy, Gadi, 2021. "Mandatory disclosure and financial contagion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    9. Matthew Kubic, 2025. "The benefits of article 11 pro forma disclosure," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 2768-2821, September.
    10. Christian Hofmann, 2006. "Unternehmenspublizität und Eigenkapitalkosten," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(55), pages 109-146, January.
    11. Hermsen, Oliver & Witte, Björn-Christopher & Westerhoff, Frank, 2010. "Disclosure requirements, the release of new information and market efficiency: new insights from agent-based models," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 4, pages 1-26.
    12. Gang Kou & Yang Lu, 2025. "FinTech: a literature review of emerging financial technologies and applications," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-34, December.
    13. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    14. Goldstein, Itay & Leitner, Yaron, 2018. "Stress tests and information disclosure," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 34-69.
    15. Coraggio, Luca & Pagano, Marco & Scognamiglio, Annalisa & Tåg, Joacim, 2025. "JAQ of all trades: Job mismatch, firm productivity and managerial quality," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Mohamed Al Guindy & James P. Naughton & Ryan Riordan, 2024. "The evolution of corporate twitter usage," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3-4), pages 819-845, March.
    17. John C. Coates IV, 2007. "The Goals and Promise of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(1), pages 91-116, Winter.
    18. Vikas Agarwal & Wei Jiang & Yuehua Tang & Baozhong Yang, 2013. "Uncovering Hedge Fund Skill from the Portfolio Holdings They Hide," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(2), pages 739-783, April.
    19. Jinjuan Yang & Jiayuan Xin & Yan Zeng & Pei Jose Liu, 2025. "Signaling and perceiving on equity crowdfunding decisions — a machine learning approach," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 315-356, June.
    20. Silvio Traverso & Guido Bonatti, 2015. "Education and FDI: An Insight from US Outflows," Journal of Social Economics, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 2(3), pages 101-116.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0340383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.