IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0337253.html

Measuring and valuing spillover effects in caregivers and families: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Tho T H Dang
  • Angeli Tabinga
  • Hannah Beilby
  • Natalie Barker
  • Luke R Johnson
  • Haitham Tuffaha
  • Luke B Connelly
  • Angela M Maguire

Abstract

Objectives: As healthcare increasingly relies on informal care for chronic and complex conditions, economic evaluations have expanded beyond patient outcomes to consider spillover effects on caregivers and families. This scoping review aimed to map existing measures and methods for assessing these effects and to identify potential mechanisms, mediators, and moderators to inform future survey design. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of four databases (PubMed, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Complete, and EconLit) for English-language studies published from 2017 to 2025, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research reporting monetary or non-monetary spillovers. Screening and study selection followed the Participants, Concept, Context framework and were reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: A total of 141 studies met the inclusion criteria. Incorporating caregiver and family spillovers could meaningfully alter cost-effectiveness estimates, but this practice remained inconsistent due to limited data and methodological variability. Comprehensive assessment of spillover effects benefited from combining generic, caregiver-specific, and disease-specific tools to capture both perceived and measurable impacts. Valuation of societal and economic spillovers, including informal care time, costs, productivity loss, and wellbeing impact, was influenced by methodological choices, caregiver and patient characteristics, and caregiving context, highlighting the need for flexible, context-sensitive approaches. Caregiver outcomes reflected the interplay of mediating factors (psychological, social, relational) and moderating influences (coping, spirituality, support systems, caregiving intensity). Subjective caregiver burden was pivotal, shaping and conditioning the effects of caregiving stressors on wellbeing. Conclusion: Establishing consensus on best-practice approaches for incorporating spillover effects in economic evaluations is needed to accurately quantify their impact on caregivers and families and to inform interventions that reduce caregiver burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Tho T H Dang & Angeli Tabinga & Hannah Beilby & Natalie Barker & Luke R Johnson & Haitham Tuffaha & Luke B Connelly & Angela M Maguire, 2026. "Measuring and valuing spillover effects in caregivers and families: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337253
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337253
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337253&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0337253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.