IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0334882.html

Green accounting and ESG-driven eco-efficiency in European financial institutions: A two-stage DEA–CRITIC-TOPSIS evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • George Sklavos
  • Georgia Zournatzidou
  • Konstantina Ragazou
  • Nikolaos Sariannidis

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of the eco-efficiency of financial institutions and their underlying green accounting practices is imperative as Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles become ingrained in financial regulation and investment strategy. Nevertheless, the current ESG assessments frequently suffer from a lack of a dual focus on governance quality and performance, which raises concerns about misaligned reporting and Greenwashing. Objective: This investigation suggests a two-stage methodological framework for evaluating the eco-efficiency of European financial institutions that is driven by ESG and evaluating the impact of internal green accounting practices on sustainability performance. Methods: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is implemented in the initial phase to calculate eco-efficiency scores that are determined by financial outputs and environmental inputs (GHG emissions, energy consumption, assets). The second stage employs the CRITIC-TOPSIS method to rank 365 institutions according to seven governance-related green accounting criteria. These criteria are derived from the Refinitiv ESG Screener CO₂ dataset. The performance frontiers are identified by DEA, while the contribution of internal sustainability mechanisms is assessed by CRITIC-TOPSIS. Results: According to the DEA results, only 38% of institutions are entirely efficient, with a substantial degree of variation across the sample. The results of the CRITIC-TOPSIS analysis indicate that the most reliable predictors of green accounting quality are governance indicators, including the presence of an ESG committee and board supervision of climate risks. According to a moderate positive correlation between DEA scores and TOPSIS rankings, eco-efficiency and green accounting maturity are related, but they are not entirely aligned. Conclusions: The results underscore the importance of integrating institutional governance evaluations with operational performance metrics to accurately evaluate sustainability. Theoretical and methodological contributions to the disciplines of environmental accounting and sustainable finance are made by this integrated framework, which provides regulators, rating agencies, and institutional decision-makers with valuable insights.

Suggested Citation

  • George Sklavos & Georgia Zournatzidou & Konstantina Ragazou & Nikolaos Sariannidis, 2025. "Green accounting and ESG-driven eco-efficiency in European financial institutions: A two-stage DEA–CRITIC-TOPSIS evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334882
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334882
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0334882&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0334882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dina Lucia Todaro & Riccardo Torelli, 2024. "From greenwashing to ESG‐washing: A focus on the circular economy field," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4034-4046, September.
    2. Chen, Zhongfei & Xie, Guanxia, 2022. "ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Zhao, Xinlu & Huang, Xiaohui & Liu, Fang & Pan, Lin, 2024. "Executive power discrepancy and corporate ESG greenwashing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA).
    4. Li, Jiao, 2024. "Controlling shareholders’ stock pledges and greenwashing–Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matanle, Peter & Li, Yang & Fakharuzi, Zhamayne & Shin, Yejin & Bradley, Jonathan & McCafferty, Jim, 2025. "Learning from Japan by Avoiding its Mistakes! Assessing the ‘S’ in ESG and its Impact on Financial Performance in Large South Korean Corporations," OSF Preprints jk9hp_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Qiao, Penghua & Qiu, Kaizhong & Fung, Anna & Yau, Jot & Fung, Hung-Gay, 2025. "Exploring the linkage between smart manufacturing technology and outward foreign direct investment in the new digital information age," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    3. Wu, Fang & Cao, June & Zhang, Xiaosan, 2023. "Do non-executive employees matter in curbing corporate financial fraud?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Wang, Xiaoteng & Zhou, Bole & Li, Xiaoling, 2025. "Qualified foreign institutional investors and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    5. Tim Heubeck & Annina Ahrens, 2025. "Governing the Responsible Investment of Slack Resources in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance: How Beneficial are CSR Committees?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 365-385, May.
    6. Hu, Siyang & Zhang, Chongyan, 2025. "ESG disclosure quality, supply chain resilience, and corporate performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PE).
    7. Xin Xu & Meiya Sun, 2025. "Digital Transformation, Internationalisation and ESG Performance of Multinational Companies," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(5), pages 2709-2725, July.
    8. Pompei MITITEAN & Nicoleta-Florina SĂRMAȘ, 2023. "The Relationship Between Sustainability Reporting and Corporate Performance. Evidence from the European Energy Sector," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 4(7), pages 49-59, July.
    9. Wu, Shilei & Zhou, Fu-You & Si, Deng-Kui & Hao, Jiawei, 2025. "Does ESG rating policy reduce corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Hao, Yun & Wu, Wenzhao, 2024. "Environment, social, and governance performance and corporate financing constraints," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    11. Yang, Xingquan & Zhao, Rui & Yang, Zheng, 2024. "Preventive regulation and corporate financialization: Evidence from China Securities Regulatory Commission's random inspections," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Liang, Jinma & Zhang, Yicheng & Li, Yuanheng, 2024. "The role of ESG scores in ESG fund performance and institutional investor selection," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Gong, Zhongyi & He, Pei & Sun, Yuyang, 2025. "Social governance, financial regulation, and corporate investment efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Ved Dilip Beloskar & S. V. D. Nageswara Rao, 2024. "Screening activity matters: Evidence from ESG portfolio performance from an emerging market," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2593-2619, July.
    15. Verga Matos, Pedro & Neves, Pedro, 2025. "Wage asymmetries in Portugal: The top executive–worker pay gap and its implications for Sustainable Development Goal 10," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(5).
    16. Xu, Zhichao, 2025. "Can the participation of party organizations in corporate governance enhance the risk-bearing capacity of listed companies?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Mohapatra, Swati & Kumar, Ashish & Mohapatra, Malaya Ranjan & Srivastava, Vikas, 2025. "Does CEO duality moderate environmental, social, and governance performance-earnings management relationship? Evidence from emerging markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Yunfu Zhu & Haoling Yang & Ma Zhong, 2023. "Do ESG Ratings of Chinese Firms Converge or Diverge? A Comparative Analysis Based on Multiple Domestic and International Ratings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Purvis, Ben & Calzolari, Tommaso & Genovese, Andrea, 2025. "Consensus and contestation: Reflections on the development of an indicator framework for a just transition to a circular economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    20. Zhang, Qi & Lau, Jat-Syu, 2025. "Promotion or suppression? An empirical exploration of online media supervision on corporate financing efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0334882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.