IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0326505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on quantitative evaluation of China’s Intelligent Construction Policy (CICP) based on the integration of PMC index model and multi-dimensional analytical framework

Author

Listed:
  • Xiongquan Ou
  • Ming Ma
  • Wei Wang

Abstract

This study presents a systematic evaluation of China’s Intelligent Construction Policies (CICP) from 2010 to 2022, employing a quantitative approach based on the Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index model. Through text mining and bibliometric analysis, we assess the formulation quality, evolution, and effectiveness of 30 national policies, identifying distinct phases of development: the Cultivation and Exploration Phase (CEP: 2010–2019) and the Development and Promotion Phase (DPP: 2020–2022). The results demonstrate a significant improvement in policy quality, with the DPP achieving higher PMC scores and more frequent issuance of “Excellent” and “Positive” policies. Key findings reveal the transition from fragmented, exploratory policies to integrated, goal-oriented strategies, emphasizing industrialization, digitalization, and sustainability. However, gaps remain in policy scope, effectiveness, and incentive mechanisms. The study concludes with targeted recommendations for optimizing CICP, including expanding policy scope, enhancing implementation frameworks, and fostering public-private innovation ecosystems to align with technological advancements and industry demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiongquan Ou & Ming Ma & Wei Wang, 2025. "Research on quantitative evaluation of China’s Intelligent Construction Policy (CICP) based on the integration of PMC index model and multi-dimensional analytical framework," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-39, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326505
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326505
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326505&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0326505?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.