IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0323876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the surplus distribution principle on the development of agricultural cooperatives in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yugang Han
  • Yating Nie
  • Aihua Lv
  • Lei Ye

Abstract

Surplus distribution is at the core of cooperative systems. This study examines the impact of the surplus distribution principle on the development of agricultural cooperatives. We utilize panel data on cooperative development and surplus distribution for 30 provinces in China from 2008 to 2021 to identify the development pattern and surplus distribution status of cooperatives. A two-way fixed effects model is used as a benchmark to examine the impact of the surplus distribution principle on the development of cooperatives. The empirical analysis shows that the surplus distribution method, which strictly adheres to a trading return of more than 60% of the distributable surplus, has a significant negative impact on cooperative membership size but a significant positive impact on cooperative income. These results remain robust after controlling for the estimation method, replacing the core explanatory variables, shrinking the tails, and conducting endogeneity tests. This study contributes to a macro-level understanding of the impact of the surplus distribution principle on the performance and scale of cooperatives and provides important policy insights for promoting surplus distribution standardization in farmers’ cooperatives and guiding members to establish a stable benefit-linkage mechanism within cooperatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Yugang Han & Yating Nie & Aihua Lv & Lei Ye, 2025. "Impact of the surplus distribution principle on the development of agricultural cooperatives in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323876
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323876
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0323876&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0323876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Wanglin & Renwick, Alan & Yuan, Peng & Ratna, Nazmun, 2018. "Agricultural cooperative membership and technical efficiency of apple farmers in China: An analysis accounting for selectivity bias," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 122-132.
    2. Channa, Hira & Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob & Feleke, Shiferaw & Abdoulaye, Tahirou, 2022. "Overcoming smallholder farmers’ post-harvest constraints through harvest loans and storage technology: Insights from a randomized controlled trial in Tanzania," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao Zhang & Ruifa Hu, 2022. "Adoption of Direct Seeding, Yield and Fertilizer Use in Rice Production: Empirical Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    2. repec:osf:osfxxx:nwp8k_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Awal Abdul‐Rahaman & Gazali Issahaku & Wanglin Ma, 2023. "Agrifood system participation and production efficiency among smallholder vegetable farmers in Northern Ghana," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 812-835, July.
    4. Schwab, Benjamin & Yu, Jisang, 2022. "Guaranteed Storage? Risk and Credit Constraints in the Demand for Postharvest Technology and Rice Seed Storage Decisions in Bangladesh," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322475, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Guangyan Ran & Guangyao Wang & Huijuan Du & Mi Lv, 2023. "Relationship of Cooperative Management and Green and Low-Carbon Transition of Agriculture and Its Impacts: A Case Study of the Western Tarim River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    6. repec:ags:aaea22:335541 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Xin Deng & Lingzhi Zhang & Rong Xu & Miao Zeng & Qiang He & Dingde Xu & Yanbin Qi, 2022. "Do Cooperatives Affect Groundwater Protection? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
    8. Wei Wei & Guanyi Yin & Shuai Xie & Qingzhi Sun & Zhan Zhang & Guanghao Li, 2023. "The Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Influencing Factors of Different New Agricultural Business Entities in China—Based on POI Data from 2012 to 2021," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Abebayehu Girma Geffersa, 2024. "Does cooperative membership enhance inorganic fertilizer use intensity? Panel data evidence from maize farmers in Ethiopia," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(2), pages 327-361, June.
    10. Wang, Anbang & He, Ke & Zhang, Junbiao & Zeng, Yangmei, 2021. "Green Production Technologies and Technical Efficiency of Rice Farmers in China: A Case Study of Straw-Derived Biochar," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315026, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Xueli Ma & Tianyuan Ren & Sardar M. N. Islam, 2024. "Multi-Party Collaboration in Agricultural Green Technology Innovation and Adoption: An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-34, November.
    12. Junying Lin & Songqing Jin & Hongdong Guo, 2023. "Do outsourcing services provided by agricultural cooperatives affect technical efficiency? Insights from tobacco farmers in China," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 781-804, September.
    13. Xiaoheng Zhang & Wanglin Ma & Puneet Vatsa & Shijie Jiang, 2023. "Short supply chain, technical efficiency, and technological change: Insights from cucumber production," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 371-386, March.
    14. Manda, Julius & Khonje, Makaiko G. & Alene, Arega D. & Tufa, Adane H & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Mutenje, Munyaradzi & Setimela, Peter & Manyong, Victor, 2020. "Does cooperative membership increase and accelerate agricultural technology adoption? Empirical evidence from Zambia," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    15. Neubauer, Florian & Songsermsawas, Tisorn & Kámiche-Zegarra, Joanna & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E., 2022. "Technical efficiency and technological gaps correcting for selectivity bias: Insights from a value chain project in Nepal," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Linli Jiang & Yun Tian & Nan Chen & Yun Luo, 2023. "An empirical exploration into the determinants of rice farmers’ decisions to adopt low-carbon agricultural technologies in Hubei Province, China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 1-25, April.
    17. Wanglin Ma & Hongyun Zheng & Yueji Zhu & Jianling Qi, 2022. "Effects of cooperative membership on financial performance of banana farmers in China: A heterogeneous analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 5-27, March.
    18. Djuraeva, Mukhayo & Babadjanova, Mashkhura & Primov, Abdulla & Egamberdiev, Bekhzod, 2025. "The Impact of Agricultural Extension Services on Female Farmers` Technical Efficiency: Evidence from Crop Producer Women in Uzbekistan," EconStor Preprints 312435, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    19. Masselus, Lise & Petrik, Christina & Ankel-Peters, Jörg, 2024. "Lost in the design space? Construct validity in the microfinance literature," Ruhr Economic Papers 1097, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    20. Wan, Wei & Han, Yiwen & Wu, Hanqing & Liu, Fan & Liu, Zhong, 2021. "Application of the source–sink landscape method in the evaluation of agricultural non-point source pollution: First estimation of an orchard-dominated area in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    21. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    22. Xiaokang Hou & Shah Fahad & Peipei Zhao & Beibei Yan & Tianjun Liu, 2022. "The Trilogy of the Chinese Apple Futures Market: Price Discovery, Risk-Hedging and Cointegration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0323876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.