IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0322376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking the return insurance puzzle in e-commerce: A strategic dance between e-sellers and the e-platform

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Zhang

Abstract

As return insurance has become a prevalent strategy, understanding the influences of the return insurance remains a critical question. This study considers a supply chain comprising an e-platform and two competing e-sellers with different product qualities under a commission contract. Eight duopoly game models were constructed to uncover optimal return insurance policies and their influences for e-sellers and the e-platform, considering the customer heterogeneity. Several key findings emerge:1) When the e-platform does not offer return insurance, retailers determine the size of the premium and choose the optimal return strategy based on a combination of the premium, the commission rates, the return compensation, and the return rate; 2) When the e-platform does not offer return insurance, retailers can lower their prices to encourage consumers to decide whether or not to purchase return insurance by themselves; 3) The e-platform that offers return insurance can change retailers’ return strategy to the detriment of both the high quality e-sellers’ profits and their own revenue.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Zhang, 2025. "Unlocking the return insurance puzzle in e-commerce: A strategic dance between e-sellers and the e-platform," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322376
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322376
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0322376&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0322376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0322376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.