Author
Listed:
- Julius Adewopo
- Bo Pieter Johannes Andrée
- Helen Peter
- Gloria Solano-Hermosilla
- Fabio Micale
Abstract
Continuous access to up-to-date food price data is crucial for monitoring food security and responding swiftly to emerging risks. However, in many food-insecure countries, price data is often delayed, lacks spatial detail, or is unavailable during crises when markets may become inaccessible, and rising prices can rapidly exacerbate hunger. Recent innovations, such as AI-driven data imputation and crowdsourcing, present new opportunities to generate continuous, localized price data. This paper evaluates the reliability of these approaches by comparing them to traditional enumerator-led data collection in northern Nigeria, a region affected by conflict, food insecurity, and data scarcity. The analysis examines crowdsourced prices for two staple food commodities, maize and rice, submitted daily by volunteers through a smartphone application over 36 months (2019–2021), and compares them with data collected concurrently by trained enumerators during the final eight months of 2021. Additionally, the crowdsourced dataset is compared to AI-imputed prices from the World Bank’s Real-Time Prices (RTP) database. Data from the alternative methods reflected similar price inflation trends during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pearson’s correlation coefficients indicate strong statistical agreement between crowdsourced and enumerator-collected prices (r = 0.94 for yellow and white maize, r = 0.96 for Indian rice, and r = 0.78 for Thailand rice). Furthermore, the crowdsourced data shows a high correlation with the AI-imputed prices (r = 0.99 for maize, and r = 0.94 for rice). The results from additional statistical tests of normality and paired means shows that the discrepancies between price datasets are consistent with measurement error rather than differences in actual price dynamics. Further tests of equivalence confirmed that enumerator and crowdsourced prices represent the same underlying market processes for specific commodity subtypes, and connotes that crowdsourced price data is a credible reference for validating AI-imputed estimates. The results support the use of AI imputation and crowdsourcing methods to improve price data collection and track market dynamics in near real time. These data innovations can be particularly valuable in areas that are underrepresented in national aggregate data due to limited monitoring capacity, and where high-frequency local data can aid targeted interventions.
Suggested Citation
Julius Adewopo & Bo Pieter Johannes Andrée & Helen Peter & Gloria Solano-Hermosilla & Fabio Micale, 2025.
"AI-imputed and crowdsourced price data show strong agreement with traditional price surveys in data-scarce environments,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-28, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0320720
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320720
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0320720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.