IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0317184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Privatized healthcare for older adults living with chronic illness: A scoping review protocol for synthesizing the state of knowledge on their experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart McKinlay
  • Christine L Sheppard
  • Paige Brown
  • Luxey Sirisegaram
  • Kristina M Kokorelias

Abstract

As global populations age, the prevalence of chronic illness among older adults is increasing, intensifying the burden on healthcare systems. Research shows that today’s older adults, especially those over 65, are more likely to suffer from multiple chronic conditions than previous generations. This demographic shift underscores the urgent need for healthcare systems capable of addressing complex, long-term health needs. The rise of privatized healthcare—services provided by non-governmental entities and funded through private insurance or out-of-pocket payments—has become a significant feature of the healthcare landscape, affecting how older adults receive care. In contrast to public healthcare systems, which are government-funded and aim to ensure universal coverage, privatized models often involve substantial private costs. Hybrid systems, such as those in Australia, combine public and private elements to offer comprehensive services. However, even in predominantly public systems like Canada, private costs for non-covered services persist. This scoping review protocol outlines a plan to identify (1) the potential role of privatized healthcare models in countries with public or hybrid healthcare in addressing health needs, (2) challenges and limitations associated with these models for older adults living with chronic conditions, and (3) current gaps in knowledge regarding the impact of privatized healthcare on care outcomes for older adults, based on the available literature.. It aims to explore the experiences and challenges of this population across various countries with public or hybrid healthcare systems. The review will use a structured methodology based on the Arskey and O’Malley guidelines and the Joanna Briggs Institute framework, focusing on qualitative studies published in the past 20 years. By comparing findings across different settings, the review seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of how privatized healthcare models affect older adults and inform future research and policy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart McKinlay & Christine L Sheppard & Paige Brown & Luxey Sirisegaram & Kristina M Kokorelias, 2025. "Privatized healthcare for older adults living with chronic illness: A scoping review protocol for synthesizing the state of knowledge on their experiences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317184
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317184
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0317184&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0317184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0317184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.