IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0315298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BUILDing SCHOLARS: A program exemplar at a Hispanic serving institution to develop biomedical researchers

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Aguilera
  • Guadalupe Corral
  • Angelica Monarrez
  • Amy E Wagler
  • Lourdes E Echegoyen

Abstract

The student development initiatives of the BUILDing SCHOLARS Center at The University of Texas at El Paso comprise a program intended to prepare undergraduate students to enter and succeed in advanced graduate and professional biomedical degree programs, ultimately contributing to the diversity of the biomedical research workforce. The program adopted the Johnson/Bozemann Asset Bundles model, which recommends addressing five areas necessary to support minority students as they prepare for and continue towards scientific careers: a) educational endowments, b) science socialization, c) network development, d) family expectations and e) material resources. Through a variety of activities, which included a minimum of two years of research training, all five asset bundles were integrated into the program. Validated scales on science identity and research self-efficacy were completed by program fellows, and academic metrics such as retention, grade point average (GPA), and time to degree were collected for both program fellows and a comparison group. Thorough records of all students who participated in the program, including their presentations and co-authored publications, have been maintained, and students are being tracked post-graduation to determine their entry and completion of advanced degrees. Academic-based results for the first three cohorts of program participants show large, significant, and positive differences in retention, 4-year graduation rates and entry into advanced degrees between program participants and the comparison group. Comparison of academic and non-academic metrics indicate that the asset bundles approach is effective in retaining and preparing students for advanced degrees and careers in STEM disciplines. Using our results in combination with research by others on retention of students in STEM, we suggest factors contributing to the push-out of very talented majority Hispanic students in the comparison group from completing STEM degrees or not pursuing advanced studies in STEM areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Aguilera & Guadalupe Corral & Angelica Monarrez & Amy E Wagler & Lourdes E Echegoyen, 2024. "BUILDing SCHOLARS: A program exemplar at a Hispanic serving institution to develop biomedical researchers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0315298
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0315298
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0315298&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0315298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Leone & Robert G. Tian, 2009. "Push Vs Pull: Factors Influence Student Retention," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 1(2), pages 122-132, June.
    2. Bedoor K. AlShebli & Talal Rahwan & Wei Lee Woon, 2018. "The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Julie J. Park & Young K. Kim & Cinthya Salazar & Shannon Hayes, 2020. "Student–Faculty Interaction and Discrimination from Faculty in STEM: The Link with Retention," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(3), pages 330-356, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malgorzata Wachowska & Magdalena Homa, 2020. "The Role of Ethnic Diversity in Stimulating Innovation Processes: Comparative Analysis of Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1157-1176.
    2. Junwan Liu & Xiaoyun Gong & Shuo Xu & Chenchen Huang, 2024. "Understanding the relationship between team diversity and the innovative performance in research teams using decision tree algorithms: evidence from artificial intelligence," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(12), pages 7805-7831, December.
    3. Diaeldin Osman & Conor O’Leary & Mark Brimble & Dave Thompson, 2019. "Factor That Impact Attrition And Retention Rates Among Accountancy Diploma Students: Evidence From Saudi Arabia," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 11(1), pages 89-110.
    4. Paul X. McCarthy & Xian Gong & Marieth Coetzer & Marian-Andrei Rizoiu & Margaret L. Kern & John A. Johnson & Richard Holden & Fabian Braesemann, 2025. "The economics of global personality diversity," Papers 2503.19388, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    5. Yue Wang & Ning Li & Bin Zhang & Qian Huang & Jian Wu & Yang Wang, 2023. "The effect of structural holes on producing novel and disruptive research in physics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1801-1823, March.
    6. Fengyuan Liu & Petter Holme & Matteo Chiesa & Bedoor AlShebli & Talal Rahwan, 2023. "Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 353-364, March.
    7. Yu, Xiaoyao & Szymanski, Boleslaw K. & Jia, Tao, 2021. "Become a better you: Correlation between the change of research direction and the change of scientific performance," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    8. repec:osf:osfxxx:qnzh6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Li, Meiling & Wang, Yang & Du, Haifeng & Bai, Aruhan, 2024. "Motivating innovation: The impact of prestigious talent funding on junior scientists," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(9).
    10. Xiancheng Li & Luca Verginer & Massimo Riccaboni & P. Panzarasa, 2022. "A network approach to expertise retrieval based on path similarity and credit allocation," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 17(2), pages 501-533, April.
    11. Yi Bu & Mengyang Li & Weiye Gu & Win‐bin Huang, 2021. "Topic diversity: A discipline scheme‐free diversity measurement for journals," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(5), pages 523-539, May.
    12. Wei Fu & Shin-Yi Chou & Li-San Wang, 2022. "NIH Grant Expansion, Ancestral Diversity and Scientific Discovery in Genomics Research," NBER Working Papers 30155, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Han Woo Park & George A. Barnett, 2024. "ICA fellows’ networking patterns in terms of collaboration, citation, and bibliographic coupling and the relevance of co-ethnicity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5433-5452, September.
    14. Yann Bramoullé & Rachel E Kranton, 2022. "Altruism Networks, Income Inequality, and Economic Relations," AMSE Working Papers 2202, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    15. Jielan Ding & Zhesi Shen & Per Ahlgren & Tobias Jeppsson & David Minguillo & Johan Lyhagen, 2021. "The link between ethnic diversity and scientific impact: the mediating effect of novelty and audience diversity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7759-7810, September.
    16. Gabor Bekes & Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano, 2022. "Cultural homophily and collaboration in superstar teams," CEP Discussion Papers dp1873, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    17. Zhang, Yang & Wang, Yang & Du, Haifeng & Havlin, Shlomo, 2024. "Delayed citation impact of interdisciplinary research," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    18. Bornmann, Lutz & Haunschild, Robin & Mutz, Rüdiger, 2020. "Should citations be field-normalized in evaluative bibliometrics? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    19. Sarah M Ovink & W Carson Byrd & Megan Nanney & Abigail Wilson, 2024. "“Figuring out your place at a school like this:” Intersectionality and sense of belonging among STEM and non-STEM college students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-30, January.
    20. Hou Zhu & Li Shuhuai, 2024. "Instant prediction of scientific paper cited potential based on semantic and metadata features: Taking artificial intelligence field as an example," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-20, December.
    21. Uchegbu, Ijeoma, 2021. "Ethnic Diversity in Science," OSF Preprints qnzh6, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0315298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.