IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0315298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BUILDing SCHOLARS: A program exemplar at a Hispanic serving institution to develop biomedical researchers

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Aguilera
  • Guadalupe Corral
  • Angelica Monarrez
  • Amy E Wagler
  • Lourdes E Echegoyen

Abstract

The student development initiatives of the BUILDing SCHOLARS Center at The University of Texas at El Paso comprise a program intended to prepare undergraduate students to enter and succeed in advanced graduate and professional biomedical degree programs, ultimately contributing to the diversity of the biomedical research workforce. The program adopted the Johnson/Bozemann Asset Bundles model, which recommends addressing five areas necessary to support minority students as they prepare for and continue towards scientific careers: a) educational endowments, b) science socialization, c) network development, d) family expectations and e) material resources. Through a variety of activities, which included a minimum of two years of research training, all five asset bundles were integrated into the program. Validated scales on science identity and research self-efficacy were completed by program fellows, and academic metrics such as retention, grade point average (GPA), and time to degree were collected for both program fellows and a comparison group. Thorough records of all students who participated in the program, including their presentations and co-authored publications, have been maintained, and students are being tracked post-graduation to determine their entry and completion of advanced degrees. Academic-based results for the first three cohorts of program participants show large, significant, and positive differences in retention, 4-year graduation rates and entry into advanced degrees between program participants and the comparison group. Comparison of academic and non-academic metrics indicate that the asset bundles approach is effective in retaining and preparing students for advanced degrees and careers in STEM disciplines. Using our results in combination with research by others on retention of students in STEM, we suggest factors contributing to the push-out of very talented majority Hispanic students in the comparison group from completing STEM degrees or not pursuing advanced studies in STEM areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Aguilera & Guadalupe Corral & Angelica Monarrez & Amy E Wagler & Lourdes E Echegoyen, 2024. "BUILDing SCHOLARS: A program exemplar at a Hispanic serving institution to develop biomedical researchers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0315298
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0315298
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0315298&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0315298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bedoor K. AlShebli & Talal Rahwan & Wei Lee Woon, 2018. "The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Matthew Leone & Robert G. Tian, 2009. "Push Vs Pull: Factors Influence Student Retention," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 1(2), pages 122-132, June.
    3. Julie J. Park & Young K. Kim & Cinthya Salazar & Shannon Hayes, 2020. "Student–Faculty Interaction and Discrimination from Faculty in STEM: The Link with Retention," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(3), pages 330-356, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malgorzata Wachowska & Magdalena Homa, 2020. "The Role of Ethnic Diversity in Stimulating Innovation Processes: Comparative Analysis of Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1157-1176.
    2. Diaeldin Osman & Conor O’Leary & Mark Brimble & Dave Thompson, 2019. "Factor That Impact Attrition And Retention Rates Among Accountancy Diploma Students: Evidence From Saudi Arabia," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 11(1), pages 89-110.
    3. Yu, Xiaoyao & Szymanski, Boleslaw K. & Jia, Tao, 2021. "Become a better you: Correlation between the change of research direction and the change of scientific performance," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:qnzh6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Wei Fu & Shin-Yi Chou & Li-San Wang, 2022. "NIH Grant Expansion, Ancestral Diversity and Scientific Discovery in Genomics Research," NBER Working Papers 30155, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Bramoullé, Yann & Kranton, Rachel, 2022. "Altruism Networks, Income Inequality, and Economic Relations," CEPR Discussion Papers 17000, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Gabor Bekes & Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano, 2022. "Cultural homophily and collaboration in superstar teams," CEP Discussion Papers dp1873, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    8. Zhang, Yang & Wang, Yang & Du, Haifeng & Havlin, Shlomo, 2024. "Delayed citation impact of interdisciplinary research," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    9. Bornmann, Lutz & Haunschild, Robin & Mutz, Rüdiger, 2020. "Should citations be field-normalized in evaluative bibliometrics? An empirical analysis based on propensity score matching," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    10. Dunleavy, Spencer & Douchee, Jeremiah & Liu, Tina & Johnson, Natrina L. & Komaromy, Miriam & Chatterjee, Avik, 2024. "Racism, not race: Quantitative analysis of the use of race and racism in the addiction literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    11. Liu, Qiuling & Guo, Lei & Sun, Yiping & Ren, Linlin & Wang, Xinhua & Han, Xiaohui, 2024. "Do scholars' collaborative tendencies impact the quality of their publications? A generalized propensity score matching analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    12. Kazuki Nakajima & Kazuyuki Shudo & Naoki Masuda, 2023. "Higher-order rich-club phenomenon in collaborative research grant networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2429-2446, April.
    13. Xiaomei Bai & Fuli Zhang & Jinzhou Li & Zhong Xu & Zeeshan Patoli & Ivan Lee, 2021. "Quantifying scientific collaboration impact by exploiting collaboration-citation network," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7993-8008, September.
    14. Qian Yu & Xiuwen Li & Ding Ma & Li Zhang & Kexin Chen & Qiang Xue & Qingjie Zhang, 2024. "Interdisciplinary hierarchical diversity driving disruption," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(12), pages 7833-7849, December.
    15. Julie J. Park & Young K. Kim & Kristyn Lue & Roshan M. Parikh, 2022. "What’s Next? Soon-to-be STEM Graduates on Their Post-graduate Plans," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 63(8), pages 1343-1367, December.
    16. Lu Liu & Benjamin F. Jones & Brian Uzzi & Dashun Wang, 2023. "Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 1046-1058, July.
    17. Simson, Rebecca & Harris, J. Andrew, 2022. "Diversity and liberalisation reforms: Evidence from the University of Nairobi," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Dennis Essers & Francesco Grigoli & Evgenia Pugacheva, 2022. "Network effects and research collaborations: evidence from IMF Working Paper co-authorship," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7169-7192, December.
    19. Hjelm, Linnea L. & Francis, Carolee Dodge & Bareng-Antolin, Noehealani, 2025. "An evaluation of a 9th and 10th grade Native American virtual pilot: Utilizing a culturally responsive and Inclusive Science model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    20. Sang Yoon Kim & Won Kyung Lee & Su Jung Jee & So Young Sohn, 2025. "Discovering AI adoption patterns from big academic graph data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 809-831, February.
    21. Matthias Kuppler, 2022. "Predicting the future impact of Computer Science researchers: Is there a gender bias?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(11), pages 6695-6732, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0315298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.