IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0313100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-effectiveness of the SMILE intervention compared with usual care for people with severe mental illness: A randomized clinical trial

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed El Alili
  • Berno van Meijel
  • Maurits W van Tulder
  • Marcel Adriaanse

Abstract

Objectives: Only studying effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for people with severe mental illness (SMI) is insufficient for policy making. As budgets for healthcare are limited, policy makers face the problem of allocating scarce healthcare resources. Cost-effectiveness studies are needed, but currently cost-effectiveness studies of lifestyle interventions for people with SMI delivered in ambulatory care are limited. The aim of this current study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention for people with SMI living in the Dutch community in comparison with usual care. Methods and findings: An economic evaluation was performed using a societal perspective alongside the Severe Mental Illness Lifestyle Evaluation (SMILE) pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. The SMILE lifestyle intervention is a one-year, group-based intervention delivered by trained mental healthcare workers. Costs, body weight change and quality of life were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Mixed models were used to estimate incremental costs and effects between the treatment group and the usual care group. Overall, the SMILE intervention resulted in lower total costs compared to the usual care group (-€719, 95% CI -7133; 3897). The effect difference between the intervention and usual care groups was -3.76 (95% CI -6.30; -1.23) kilograms for body weight and -0.037 (95% CI -0.083; 0.010) for QALYs. Conclusions: Overall, the SMILE intervention resulted in lower total costs compared to the usual care group and was cost-effective for body weight change. However, the SMILE intervention does not seem cost-effective with regards to QALYs. More cost-effectiveness studies in other countries and other settings are needed to gain further insight into the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for people with SMI.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed El Alili & Berno van Meijel & Maurits W van Tulder & Marcel Adriaanse, 2025. "Cost-effectiveness of the SMILE intervention compared with usual care for people with severe mental illness: A randomized clinical trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313100
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313100
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313100&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0313100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Connell, Janice & O'Cathain, Alicia & Brazier, John, 2014. "Measuring quality of life in mental health: Are we asking the right questions?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 12-20.
    2. Andrea Manca & Neil Hawkins & Mark J. Sculpher, 2005. "Estimating mean QALYs in trial‐based cost‐effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(5), pages 487-496, May.
    3. Manuel Gomes & Richard Grieve & Richard Nixon & W. J. Edmunds, 2012. "Statistical Methods for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses That Use Data from Cluster Randomized Trials," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(1), pages 209-220, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Gabrio & Catrin Plumpton & Sube Banerjee & Baptiste Leurent, 2022. "Linear mixed models to handle missing at random data in trial‐based economic evaluations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 1276-1287, June.
    2. Eldon Spackman & Stewart Richmond & Mark Sculpher & Martin Bland & Stephen Brealey & Rhian Gabe & Ann Hopton & Ada Keding & Harriet Lansdown & Sara Perren & David Torgerson & Ian Watt & Hugh MacPherso, 2014. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Acupuncture, Counselling and Usual Care in Treating Patients with Depression: The Results of the ACUDep Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Abualbishr Alshreef & Allan J. Wailoo & Steven R. Brown & James P. Tiernan & Angus J. M. Watson & Katie Biggs & Mike Bradburn & Daniel Hind, 2017. "Cost-Effectiveness of Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation versus Rubber Band Ligation for the Treatment of Grade II–III Haemorrhoids: Analysis Using Evidence from the HubBLe Trial," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 175-184, September.
    4. Rachael Hunter & Gianluca Baio & Thomas Butt & Stephen Morris & Jeff Round & Nick Freemantle, 2015. "An Educational Review of the Statistical Issues in Analysing Utility Data for Cost-Utility Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 355-366, April.
    5. Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai & Maureen Markle-Reid & Jeffrey Hoch, 2015. "Adjusting for Baseline Covariates in Net Benefit Regression: How You Adjust Matters," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(10), pages 1083-1090, October.
    6. Catharine Ward Thompson & Aldo Elizalde & Steven Cummins & Alastair H. Leyland & Willings Botha & Andrew Briggs & Sara Tilley & Eva Silveirinha de Oliveira & Jenny Roe & Peter Aspinall & Richard Mitch, 2019. "Enhancing Health Through Access to Nature: How Effective are Interventions in Woodlands in Deprived Urban Communities? A Quasi-experimental Study in Scotland, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Lukasz Tanajewski & Matthew Franklin & Georgios Gkountouras & Vladislav Berdunov & Rowan H Harwood & Sarah E Goldberg & Lucy E Bradshaw & John R F Gladman & Rachel A Elliott, 2015. "Economic Evaluation of a General Hospital Unit for Older People with Delirium and Dementia (TEAM Randomised Controlled Trial)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Henderson, Catherine & Knapp, Martin & Fernández, José-Luis & Beecham, Jennifer & Hirani, Shashivadan P. & Beynon, Michelle & Cartwright, Martin & Rixon, Lorna & Doll, Helen & Bower, Peter & Steventon, 2014. "Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57270, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Adrian Gheorghe & Tracy E Roberts & Thomas D Pinkney & David C Bartlett & Dion Morton & Melanie Calvert & on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative and the ROSSINI Trial Investigators, 2014. "The Cost-Effectiveness of Wound-Edge Protection Devices Compared to Standard Care in Reducing Surgical Site Infection after Laparotomy: An Economic Evaluation alongside the ROSSINI Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-8, April.
    10. Iftekhar Khan & Stavros Petrou & Kamran Khan & Dipesh Mistry & Ranjit Lall & Bart Sheehan & Sarah Lamb, 2019. "Does Structured Exercise Improve Cognitive Impairment in People with Mild to Moderate Dementia? A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from a Confirmatory Randomised Controlled Trial: The Dementia and Physical," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 215-227, June.
    11. Sabrina Storgaard Sørensen & Kjeld Møller Pedersen & Ulla Møller Weinreich & Lars Ehlers, 2017. "Economic Evaluation of Community-Based Case Management of Patients Suffering From Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 413-424, June.
    12. Sabrina Gabrielle Anjara & Chiara Bonetto & Poushali Ganguli & Diana Setiyawati & Yodi Mahendradhata & Bambang Hastha Yoga & Laksono Trisnantoro & Carol Brayne & Tine Van Bortel, 2019. "Can General Practitioners manage mental disorders in primary care? A partially randomised, pragmatic, cluster trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Matthew Franklin & Sarah Davis & Michelle Horspool & Wei Sun Kua & Steven Julious, 2017. "Economic Evaluations Alongside Efficient Study Designs Using Large Observational Datasets: the PLEASANT Trial Case Study," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 561-573, May.
    14. Matthew Franklin & James Lomas & Simon Walker & Tracey Young, 2019. "An Educational Review About Using Cost Data for the Purpose of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 631-643, May.
    15. Ângela Jornada Ben & Johanna M. Dongen & Mohamed El Alili & Martijn W. Heymans & Jos W. R. Twisk & Janet L. MacNeil-Vroomen & Maartje Wit & Susan E. M. Dijk & Teddy Oosterhuis & Judith E. Bosmans, 2023. "The handling of missing data in trial-based economic evaluations: should data be multiply imputed prior to longitudinal linear mixed-model analyses?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(6), pages 951-965, August.
    16. Brenna Bray & Boris C. Rodríguez-Martín & David A. Wiss & Christine E. Bray & Heather Zwickey, 2021. "Overeaters Anonymous: An Overlooked Intervention for Binge Eating Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    17. Andrew H. Briggs & Patrick S. Parfrey & Nasreen Khan & Spring Tseng & Bastian Dehmel & Yumi Kubo & Glenn M. Chertow & Vasily Belozeroff, 2016. "Analyzing Health-Related Quality of Life in the EVOLVE Trial," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 36(8), pages 965-972, November.
    18. McCarthy, Ian M., 2016. "Eliminating composite bias in treatment effects estimates: Applications to quality of life assessment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-58.
    19. Helen A. Dakin & José Leal & Andrew Briggs & Philip Clarke & Rury R. Holman & Alastair Gray, 2020. "Accurately Reflecting Uncertainty When Using Patient-Level Simulation Models to Extrapolate Clinical Trial Data," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(4), pages 460-473, May.
    20. Nadia YAKHELEF & Martine AUDIBERT & Bruno PEIRERA & Antoine MONS & Emmanuel CHABERT, 2015. "Cost-utility Analysis of Vertebroplasty versus Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis in the Treatment of Traumatic Vertebral Fractures," Working Papers 201534, CERDI.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.