IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7303-d590530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overeaters Anonymous: An Overlooked Intervention for Binge Eating Disorder

Author

Listed:
  • Brenna Bray

    (Helfgott Research Institute, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR 97201, USA
    School of Undergraduate and Graduate Studies, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR 97201, USA)

  • Boris C. Rodríguez-Martín

    (Proyecto PlaniFive, 28017 Madrid, Spain)

  • David A. Wiss

    (Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Christine E. Bray

    (Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, Saint Paul, MN 55104, USA)

  • Heather Zwickey

    (Helfgott Research Institute, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR 97201, USA
    School of Undergraduate and Graduate Studies, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR 97201, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this communication is to provide an overview as well as the strengths and weaknesses of Overeaters Anonymous (OA) as an intervention for binge eating disorder treatment. Binge eating disorder is associated with low remission rates, high relapse rates, treatment dissatisfaction, and high rates of failure to receive treatment attributed to stigma, misconceptions, lack of diagnosis, access to care, and inadequate insurance coverage. New interventions are needed that can overcome these barriers. OA is a twelve-step program and established fellowship for individuals who self-identify as having problematic relationships with food or eating. OA can be referred clinically or sought out by an individual confidentially, without a diagnosis, and free of charge. OA’s Nine Tools, Twelve Steps, and Twelve Traditions can provide structure, social support, and open, anonymous sharing that fosters a sense of connection and belonging. This may provide benefit to individuals who value structure and social support in their recovery. The tradition of anonymity may also create some challenges for conducting research and may explain the shortage of empirical support. This commentary reviews existing research findings on the effectiveness of twelve-step interventions and OA. Common misunderstandings about and within OA are also addressed and OA’s limitations are discussed. Overall, OA provides a promising option for binge eating disorder treatment that warrants clinical research on its feasibility and efficacy in a way that respects and protects its tradition of anonymity.

Suggested Citation

  • Brenna Bray & Boris C. Rodríguez-Martín & David A. Wiss & Christine E. Bray & Heather Zwickey, 2021. "Overeaters Anonymous: An Overlooked Intervention for Binge Eating Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7303-:d:590530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7303/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7303/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Connell, Janice & O'Cathain, Alicia & Brazier, John, 2014. "Measuring quality of life in mental health: Are we asking the right questions?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 12-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anju Devianee Keetharuth & Elizabeth Taylor Buck & Catherine Acquadro & Katrin Conway & Janice Connell & Michael Barkham & Jill Carlton & Thomas Ricketts & Rosemary Barber & John Brazier, 2018. "Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data in the Development of Outcome Measures: The Case of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) Measures in Mental Health Populations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, June.
    2. Myra Piat & Kimberly Seida, 2018. "Supported housing for persons with serious mental illness and personal recovery: What do families think?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(8), pages 707-714, December.
    3. Ivis García & Keuntae Kim, 2020. "“ I Felt Safe ”: The Role of the Rapid Rehousing Program in Supporting the Security of Families Experiencing Homelessness in Salt Lake County, Utah," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Rishworth, Andrea & Cao, Tiffany & Niraula, Ashika & Wilson, Kathi, 2023. "Navigating the quality-of-life impacts of a chronic inflammatory disease (CID) among South Asian children and parents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    5. Thomas Grochtdreis & Hans-Helmut König & Anju Devianee Keetharuth & Jürgen Gallinat & Alexander Konnopka & Holger Schulz & Martin Lambert & Anne Karow & Judith Dams, 2023. "Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measures in patients with affective disorders," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(4), pages 499-512, June.
    6. Tosi, Marco & Grundy, Emily, 2018. "Returns home by children and changes in parents’ well-being in Europe," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 99-106.
    7. Karimi, M. & Brazier, J. & Paisley, S., 2017. "How do individuals value health states? A qualitative investigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 80-88.
    8. Islay Mactaggart & Ammar Hasan Bek & Lena Morgon Banks & Tess Bright & Carlos Dionicio & Shaffa Hameed & Shailes Neupane & GVS Murthy & Ahmed Orucu & Joseph Oye & Jonathan Naber & Tom Shakespeare & An, 2021. "Interrogating and Reflecting on Disability Prevalence Data Collected Using the Washington Group Tools: Results from Population-Based Surveys in Cameroon, Guatemala, India, Maldives, Nepal, Turkey and ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7303-:d:590530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.