IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0224724.html

Can General Practitioners manage mental disorders in primary care? A partially randomised, pragmatic, cluster trial

Author

Listed:
  • Sabrina Gabrielle Anjara
  • Chiara Bonetto
  • Poushali Ganguli
  • Diana Setiyawati
  • Yodi Mahendradhata
  • Bambang Hastha Yoga
  • Laksono Trisnantoro
  • Carol Brayne
  • Tine Van Bortel

Abstract

Background: For a decade, experts have suggested integrating mental health care into primary care to help bridge mental health Treatment Gap. General Practitioners (GPs) are the first port-of-call for many patients with mental ill-health. In Indonesia, the WHO mhGAP is being systematically introduced to its network of 10,000 primary care clinics as an add-on mental health training for pairs of GPs and Nurses, since the end of 2015. In one of 34 provinces, there exists an integrated care model: the co-location of clinical psychologists in primary care clinics. This trial evaluates patient outcomes among those provided mental health care by GPs with those treated by clinical psychologists in primary care. Methods: In this partially-randomised, pragmatic, two-arm cluster non-inferiority trial, 14 primary care clinics were assigned to receive the WHO mhGAP training and 14 clinics with the co-location framework were assigned to the Specialist arm. Participants (patients) were blinded to the existence of the other pathway, and outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. Results: 153 patients completed the outcome assessment following GP care alongside 141 patients following Clinical Psychologists care. Outcomes of GP care were proven to be statistically not inferior to Clinical Psychologists in reducing symptoms of social and physical impairment, reducing disability, and improving health-related quality of life at six months. Economic analyses indicate lower costs and better outcomes in the Specialist arm and suggest a 50% probability of WHO mhGAP framework being cost-effective at the Indonesian willingness to pay threshold per QALY. Conclusion: General Practitioners supported by nurses in primary care clinics could effectively manage mild to moderate mental health issues commonly found among primary care patients. They provide non-stigmatising mental health care within community context, helping to reduce the mental health Treatment Gap. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02700490

Suggested Citation

  • Sabrina Gabrielle Anjara & Chiara Bonetto & Poushali Ganguli & Diana Setiyawati & Yodi Mahendradhata & Bambang Hastha Yoga & Laksono Trisnantoro & Carol Brayne & Tine Van Bortel, 2019. "Can General Practitioners manage mental disorders in primary care? A partially randomised, pragmatic, cluster trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0224724
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0224724
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0224724&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0224724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Manca & Neil Hawkins & Mark J. Sculpher, 2005. "Estimating mean QALYs in trial‐based cost‐effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(5), pages 487-496, May.
    2. Schulze, Beate & Angermeyer, Matthias C., 2003. "Subjective experiences of stigma. A focus group study of schizophrenic patients, their relatives and mental health professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 299-312, January.
    3. Mendenhall, Emily & De Silva, Mary J. & Hanlon, Charlotte & Petersen, Inge & Shidhaye, Rahul & Jordans, Mark & Luitel, Nagendra & Ssebunnya, Joshua & Fekadu, Abebaw & Patel, Vikram & Tomlinson, Mark &, 2014. "Acceptability and feasibility of using non-specialist health workers to deliver mental health care: Stakeholder perceptions from the PRIME district sites in Ethiopia, India, Nepal, South Africa, and Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 33-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erdinç Kalayci & İmran Uzunaslan & Şerif Uzunaslan, 2023. "Caregiver burden experiences of caregivers of patients with schizophrenia: A qualitative inquiry," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(3), pages 543-550, May.
    2. Eldon Spackman & Stewart Richmond & Mark Sculpher & Martin Bland & Stephen Brealey & Rhian Gabe & Ann Hopton & Ada Keding & Harriet Lansdown & Sara Perren & David Torgerson & Ian Watt & Hugh MacPherso, 2014. "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Acupuncture, Counselling and Usual Care in Treating Patients with Depression: The Results of the ACUDep Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Abualbishr Alshreef & Allan J. Wailoo & Steven R. Brown & James P. Tiernan & Angus J. M. Watson & Katie Biggs & Mike Bradburn & Daniel Hind, 2017. "Cost-Effectiveness of Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation versus Rubber Band Ligation for the Treatment of Grade II–III Haemorrhoids: Analysis Using Evidence from the HubBLe Trial," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 175-184, September.
    4. Rachael Hunter & Gianluca Baio & Thomas Butt & Stephen Morris & Jeff Round & Nick Freemantle, 2015. "An Educational Review of the Statistical Issues in Analysing Utility Data for Cost-Utility Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 355-366, April.
    5. Kvaale, Erlend P. & Gottdiener, William H. & Haslam, Nick, 2013. "Biogenetic explanations and stigma: A meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 95-103.
    6. Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai & Maureen Markle-Reid & Jeffrey Hoch, 2015. "Adjusting for Baseline Covariates in Net Benefit Regression: How You Adjust Matters," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(10), pages 1083-1090, October.
    7. Lotte Groth Jensen & Stina Lou & Jørgen Aagaard & Ulla Væggemose, 2017. "Community families: A qualitative study of families who volunteer to support persons with severe mental illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(1), pages 33-39, February.
    8. Carlos Arturo Cassiani-Miranda & Adalberto Campo-Arias & Andrés Felipe Tirado-Otálvaro & Luz Adriana Botero-Tobón & Luz Dary Upegui-Arango & María Soledad Rodríguez-Verdugo & María Elena Botero-, 2021. "Stigmatisation associated with COVID-19 in the general Colombian population," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(6), pages 728-736, September.
    9. Catharine Ward Thompson & Aldo Elizalde & Steven Cummins & Alastair H. Leyland & Willings Botha & Andrew Briggs & Sara Tilley & Eva Silveirinha de Oliveira & Jenny Roe & Peter Aspinall & Richard Mitch, 2019. "Enhancing Health Through Access to Nature: How Effective are Interventions in Woodlands in Deprived Urban Communities? A Quasi-experimental Study in Scotland, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Noor Ahmed Giasuddin & Itzhak Levav & Gilad Gal, 2015. "Mental health stigma and attitudes to psychiatry among Bangladeshi medical students," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(2), pages 137-147, March.
    11. Jinvo Nam & Nicola Dempsey, 2018. "Community Food Growing in Parks? Assessing the Acceptability and Feasibility in Sheffield, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Iftekhar Khan & Stavros Petrou & Kamran Khan & Dipesh Mistry & Ranjit Lall & Bart Sheehan & Sarah Lamb, 2019. "Does Structured Exercise Improve Cognitive Impairment in People with Mild to Moderate Dementia? A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from a Confirmatory Randomised Controlled Trial: The Dementia and Physical Activity (DAPA) Trial," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 215-227, June.
    13. Sabrina Storgaard Sørensen & Kjeld Møller Pedersen & Ulla Møller Weinreich & Lars Ehlers, 2017. "Economic Evaluation of Community-Based Case Management of Patients Suffering From Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 413-424, June.
    14. Matthew Franklin & James Lomas & Simon Walker & Tracey Young, 2019. "An Educational Review About Using Cost Data for the Purpose of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 631-643, May.
    15. Andrew H. Briggs & Patrick S. Parfrey & Nasreen Khan & Spring Tseng & Bastian Dehmel & Yumi Kubo & Glenn M. Chertow & Vasily Belozeroff, 2016. "Analyzing Health-Related Quality of Life in the EVOLVE Trial," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 36(8), pages 965-972, November.
    16. Jing Ye & Timothy F Chen & Diane Paul & Rebecca McCahon & Sumitra Shankar & Alan Rosen & Claire L O’Reilly, 2016. "Stigma and discrimination experienced by people living with severe and persistent mental illness in assertive community treatment settings," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(6), pages 532-541, September.
    17. Nadia YAKHELEF & Martine AUDIBERT & Bruno PEIRERA & Antoine MONS & Emmanuel CHABERT, 2015. "Cost-utility Analysis of Vertebroplasty versus Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis in the Treatment of Traumatic Vertebral Fractures," Working Papers 201534, CERDI.
    18. Lewis, Sophie & Thomas, Samantha L. & Blood, R. Warwick & Castle, David J. & Hyde, Jim & Komesaroff, Paul A., 2011. "How do obese individuals perceive and respond to the different types of obesity stigma that they encounter in their daily lives? A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1349-1356.
    19. Danielle Brunenberg & Gwenn Wetzels & Patricia Nelemans & Carmen Dirksen & Johan Severens & Henri Stoffers & Jan Schouten & Martin Prins & Peter Leeuw & Manuela Joore, 2007. "Cost Effectiveness of an Adherence-Improving Programme in Hypertensive Patients," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 239-251, March.
    20. Paddy Gillespie & Eamon O’Shea & Andrew Murphy & Susan Smith & Mary Byrne & Molly Byrne & Margaret Cupples, 2012. "Relative cost effectiveness of the SPHERE intervention in selected patient subgroups with existing coronary heart disease," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(4), pages 429-443, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0224724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.