IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0309817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

HypE-GA based study on optimal design of standard floor facade windowing of high-rise office buildings facing energy saving in heating, cooling and lighting

Author

Listed:
  • Weixiang Zhang
  • Jieli Sui

Abstract

The quantitative design on area and location of building façade’s windows has a significant impact on interior light and heat environment, which is also very instructive for preliminary and remodeling design of buildings. However, previous studies paid more attention to the thermal insulation construction and shading based on design parameters from the perspective of designers, but neglected the fact that the geometric properties of the windows themselves are equally important for building energy efficiency. Secondly, the weak interactivity and algorithmic limitations of traditional simulation platforms prevent rapid access to ideal design strategies. Therefore, this paper takes the standard floor of a high-rise office building as the research object in cold region−Yantai, facing façade windowing design, the three building performance objectives of each office unit−Annual Cooling Energy Consumption (AC), Annual Heating Energy Consumption (AH) and Annual Lighting Energy Consumption (AL)−are simulated and single/multi-objective optimized by relying on Ladybug and Honeybee (LB + HB) platform and Hypervolume Estimation Genetic Algorithm (HypE-GA) to obtain the genome of Pareto−Window-to-Wall Ratio (WWR), Window Height (WH) and Sill Height (SH)−at the lowest of each performance objective in order to determine the most energy-efficient façade windowing expression. The results show that AH and AC, their sum of quantities remains stable, are main energy consumption sources of office buildings, while the change of AL is more likely to have an impact than the others’ on Annual Totaling Energy Consumption (AT). The analysis points out that different windowing strategies can be adopted for different performance objectives. To reduce AC, priority is given to windowing on the east and north facade, with East Window-to-Wall Ratio (WWRE) at 0.2 ~ 0.3 and North Window-to-Wall Ratio (WWRN) at 0.3 ~ 0.5; to reduce AH, windows on the west and north facade should not be opened, and the remaining facades should be opened in small areas; to reduce AL, WWR> 0.7 is appropriate for each facade, and should be considered to matching a higher SH or WH; From AT, the average WWR in the single-objective and multi-objective optimization results are similar, so it is suggested that the WWR of each facade of office buildings in Yantai area is WWRE = 0.47, North South Window-to-Wall Ratio (WWRS) = 0.46, West Window-to-Wall Ratio (WWRW) = 0.18 and WWRN = 0.54. In addition, this paper proposes a method that can quickly find the Pareto optimal solution by clustering analysis on optimized results through Origin in multi-objective HypE-GA optimization study.

Suggested Citation

  • Weixiang Zhang & Jieli Sui, 2025. "HypE-GA based study on optimal design of standard floor facade windowing of high-rise office buildings facing energy saving in heating, cooling and lighting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309817
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309817
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0309817&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0309817?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0309817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.