IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0307997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison and development of cross-study normalization methods for inter-species transcriptional analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sofya Feldman
  • Hadas Ner-Gaon
  • Eran Treister
  • Tal Shay

Abstract

Performing joint analysis of gene expression datasets from different experiments can present challenges brought on by multiple factors—differences in equipment, protocols, climate etc. “Cross-study normalization” is a general term for transformations aimed at eliminating such effects, thus making datasets more comparable. However, joint analysis of datasets from different species is rarely done, and there are no dedicated normalization methods for such inter-species analysis. In order to test the usefulness of cross-studies normalization methods for inter-species analysis, we first applied three cross-study normalization methods, EB, DWD and XPN, to RNA sequencing datasets from different species. We then developed a new approach to evaluate the performance of cross-study normalization in eliminating experimental effects, while also maintaining the biologically significant differences between species and conditions. Our results indicate that all normalization methods performed relatively well in the cross-species setting. We found XPN to be better at reducing experimental differences, and found EB to be better at preserving biological differences. Still, according to our in-silico experiments, in all methods it is not possible to enforce the preservation of the biological differences in the normalization process. In addition to the study above, in this work we propose a new dedicated cross-studies and cross-species normalization method. Our aim is to address the shortcoming mentioned above: in the normalization process, we wish to reduce the experimental differences while preserving the biological differences. We term our method as CSN, and base it on the performance evaluation criteria mentioned above. Repeating the same experiments, the CSN method obtained a better and more balanced conservation of biological differences within the datasets compared to existing methods. To summarize, we demonstrate the usefulness of cross-study normalization methods in the inter-species settings, and suggest a dedicated cross-study cross-species normalization method that will hopefully open the way to the development of improved normalization methods for the inter-species settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofya Feldman & Hadas Ner-Gaon & Eran Treister & Tal Shay, 2024. "Comparison and development of cross-study normalization methods for inter-species transcriptional analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0307997
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307997
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0307997&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0307997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marron, J.S. & Todd, Michael J. & Ahn, Jeongyoun, 2007. "Distance-Weighted Discrimination," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 1267-1271, December.
    2. Enrico Glaab & Jaume Bacardit & Jonathan M Garibaldi & Natalio Krasnogor, 2012. "Using Rule-Based Machine Learning for Candidate Disease Gene Prioritization and Sample Classification of Cancer Gene Expression Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-18, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Makoto Aoshima & Kazuyoshi Yata, 2019. "Distance-based classifier by data transformation for high-dimension, strongly spiked eigenvalue models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(3), pages 473-503, June.
    2. Yugo Nakayama & Kazuyoshi Yata & Makoto Aoshima, 2020. "Bias-corrected support vector machine with Gaussian kernel in high-dimension, low-sample-size settings," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(5), pages 1257-1286, October.
    3. Hayley Randall & Andreas Artemiou & Xingye Qiao, 2021. "Sufficient dimension reduction based on distance‐weighted discrimination," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1186-1211, December.
    4. Marron, J.S., 2017. "Big Data in context and robustness against heterogeneity," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 73-80.
    5. Ishii, Aki & Yata, Kazuyoshi & Aoshima, Makoto, 2022. "Geometric classifiers for high-dimensional noisy data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    6. Kang, Xiaoning & Wang, Mingqiu, 2021. "Ensemble sparse estimation of covariance structure for exploring genetic disease data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Niladri Roy Chowdhury & Dianne Cook & Heike Hofmann & Mahbubul Majumder & Eun-Kyung Lee & Amy Toth, 2015. "Using visual statistical inference to better understand random class separations in high dimension, low sample size data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 293-316, June.
    8. Patrick Murigu Kamau Njage & Clementine Henri & Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon & Michel‐Yves Mistou & Rene S. Hendriksen & Tine Hald, 2019. "Machine Learning Methods as a Tool for Predicting Risk of Illness Applying Next‐Generation Sequencing Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1397-1413, June.
    9. Gao, Zhenguo & Wang, Xinye & Kang, Xiaoning, 2023. "Ensemble LDA via the modified Cholesky decomposition," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Makoto Aoshima & Kazuyoshi Yata, 2014. "A distance-based, misclassification rate adjusted classifier for multiclass, high-dimensional data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 66(5), pages 983-1010, October.
    11. Sudhir Varma, 2020. "Blind estimation and correction of microarray batch effect," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Anil K. Ghosh & Munmun Biswas, 2016. "Distribution-free high-dimensional two-sample tests based on discriminating hyperplanes," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(3), pages 525-547, September.
    13. Jung, Sungkyu, 2018. "Continuum directions for supervised dimension reduction," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 27-43.
    14. Bolivar-Cime, A. & Marron, J.S., 2013. "Comparison of binary discrimination methods for high dimension low sample size data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 108-121.
    15. Tianxiao Sun & Ion Necoara & Quoc Tran-Dinh, 2020. "Composite convex optimization with global and local inexact oracles," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 76(1), pages 69-124, May.
    16. Jang, Hyun Jung & Shin, Seung Jun & Artemiou, Andreas, 2023. "Principal weighted least square support vector machine: An online dimension-reduction tool for binary classification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Xiaosun Lu & J. S. Marron & Perry Haaland, 2014. "Object-Oriented Data Analysis of Cell Images," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(506), pages 548-559, June.
    18. Makoto Aoshima & Kazuyoshi Yata, 2019. "High-Dimensional Quadratic Classifiers in Non-sparse Settings," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 663-682, September.
    19. Rachid Kharoubi & Abdallah Mkhadri & Karim Oualkacha, 2024. "High-dimensional penalized Bernstein support vector classifier," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1909-1936, June.
    20. Sungkyu Jung & Xingye Qiao, 2014. "A statistical approach to set classification by feature selection with applications to classification of histopathology images," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 536-545, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0307997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.