IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0304016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A progressive approach to multi-criteria group decision-making: N-bipolar hypersoft topology perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Sagvan Y Musa
  • Baravan A Asaad

Abstract

This paper investigates N-bipolar hypersoft topology (N-BHST), a novel extension of both the well-established N-hypersoft topology (N-HST) and hypersoft topology (HST). Deviating significantly from its precursor, the N-bipolar hypersoft (N-BHS) set, N-BHST introduces a multi-opinion approach to decision-making, augmenting robustness and adaptability. This innovative framework addresses identified limitations in N-bipolar soft topology (N-BST), especially in managing multi-argument approximate functions. The study analyzes various operators (closure, interior, exterior, and boundary) within the N-BHST framework, elucidating their interrelationships. Additionally, an examination is carried out on the enhancement of multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) using N-BHST, setting it apart from existing models. A numerical example is presented to illustrate its application in real-world decision scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Sagvan Y Musa & Baravan A Asaad, 2024. "A progressive approach to multi-criteria group decision-making: N-bipolar hypersoft topology perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304016
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304016&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0304016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Saeed & Muhammad Imran Harl & Muhammad Haris Saeed & Ibrahim Mekawy, 2023. "Theoretical framework for a decision support system for micro-enterprise supermarket investment risk assessment using novel picture fuzzy hypersoft graph," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Sagvan Y. Musa & Baravan A. Asaad, 2021. "Bipolar Hypersoft Sets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Haiyan Zhao & Qian Xiao & Zheng Liu & Yanhong Wang, 2022. "An approach in medical diagnosis based on Z-numbers soft set," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-22, August.
    4. José Alcantud & Annick Laruelle, 2014. "Dis&approval voting: a characterization," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(1), pages 1-10, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sagvan Y Musa, 2024. "N-bipolar hypersoft sets: Enhancing decision-making algorithms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Federica Ceron & Stéphane Gonzalez, 2019. "A characterization of Approval Voting without the approval balloting assumption," Working Papers halshs-02440615, HAL.
    3. Antonin Macé, 2017. "Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting," Working Papers halshs-01222200, HAL.
    4. Pierre Dehez & Victor Ginsburgh, 2020. "Approval voting and Shapley ranking," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 415-428, September.
    5. Erdamar, Bora & Sanver, M. Remzi & Sato, Shin, 2017. "Evaluationwise strategy-proofness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 227-238.
    6. Martínez, Ricardo & Moreno, Bernardo, 2017. "Qualified voting systems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 49-54.
    7. Marcus Pivato, 2016. "Asymptotic utilitarianism in scoring rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(2), pages 431-458, August.
    8. Stéphane Gonzalez & Annick Laruelle & Philippe Solal, 2019. "Dilemma with approval and disapproval votes," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(3), pages 497-517, October.
    9. repec:ehu:ikerla:25736 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Abdelhalim El Ouafdi & Dominique Lepelley & Hatem Smaoui, 2020. "On the Condorcet efficiency of evaluative voting (and other voting rules) with trichotomous preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(2), pages 227-241, June.
    11. Barberà, Salvador & Bossert, Walter, 2023. "Opinion aggregation: Borda and Condorcet revisited," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    12. Xiaoyan Liu & Hee Sik Kim & Feng Feng & José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2018. "Centroid Transformations of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values Based on Aggregation Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Muhammad Mahajne & Oscar Volij, 2018. "The socially acceptable scoring rule," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(2), pages 223-233, August.
    14. Justin Kruger & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021. "An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(3), pages 535-555, October.
    15. Annick Laruelle, 2021. "“Not This One”: Experimental Use of the Approval and Disapproval Ballot," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 15-28, December.
    16. Priyanka Nagar & Pankaj Kumar Srivastava & Amit Srivastava, 2022. "A new dynamic score function approach to optimize a special class of Pythagorean fuzzy transportation problem," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 904-913, June.
    17. Ngoie, Ruffin-Benoît M. & Savadogo, Zoïnabo & Ulungu, Berthold E.-L., 2014. "Median and average as tools for measuring, electing and ranking: new prospects," MPRA Paper 64731, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Sep 2014.
    18. Sagvan Y. Musa & Amlak I. Alajlan & Baravan A. Asaad & Zanyar A. Ameen, 2025. "N-Bipolar Soft Expert Sets and Their Applications in Robust Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, February.
    19. Kurihara, Takashi, 2018. "Axiomatic characterisations of the basic best–worst rule," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 19-22.
    20. Muhammad Mahajne & Oscar Volij, 2017. "The Socially Acceptable Scoring Rule," Working Papers 1705, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    21. Ngoie, Ruffin-Benoît M. & Savadogo, Zoïnabo & Ulungu, Berthold E.-L., 2014. "New prospects in social choice theory: median and average as tools for measuring, electing and ranking," MPRA Paper 64155, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Dec 2014.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0304016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.