IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0302408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biases and limitations in observational studies of Long COVID prevalence and risk factors: A rapid systematic umbrella review

Author

Listed:
  • Miao Jenny Hua
  • Gisela Butera
  • Oluwaseun Akinyemi
  • Deborah Porterfield

Abstract

Background: Observational studies form the foundation of Long COVID knowledge, however combining data from Long COVID observational studies has multiple methodological challenges. This umbrella review synthesizes estimates of Long COVID prevalence and risk factors as well as biases and limitations in the primary and review literatures. Methods and findings: A systematic literature search was conducted using multiple electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, LitCOVID) from Jan 1, 2019 until June 9, 2023. Eligible studies were systematic reviews including adult populations assessed for at least one Long COVID symptom four weeks or more after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Overall and subgroup prevalence and risk factors as well as risk of bias (ROB) assessments were extracted and descriptively analyzed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023434323). Fourteen reviews of 5–196 primary studies were included: 8 reported on Long COVID prevalence, 5 on risk/protective factors, and 1 on both. Prevalence of at least 1 Long COVID symptom ranged from 21% (IQR: 8.9%-35%) to 74.5% (95% CI: 55.6%-78.0%). Risk factor reviews found significant associations between vaccination status, sex, acute COVID-19 severity, and comorbidities. Both prevalence and risk factor reviews frequently identified selection and ascertainment biases. Using the AMSTAR 2 criteria, the quality of included reviews, particularly the prevalence reviews, were concerning for the adequacy of ROB assessments and justifications for conducting meta-analysis. Conclusion: A high level of heterogeneity render the interpretation of pooled prevalence estimates of Long COVID challenging, further hampered by the lack of robust critical appraisals in the included reviews. Risk factor reviews were of higher quality overall and suggested consistent associations between Long COVID risk and patient characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao Jenny Hua & Gisela Butera & Oluwaseun Akinyemi & Deborah Porterfield, 2024. "Biases and limitations in observational studies of Long COVID prevalence and risk factors: A rapid systematic umbrella review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0302408
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302408
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302408&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0302408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian P. T. Higgins & Simon G. Thompson & David J. Spiegelhalter, 2009. "A re‐evaluation of random‐effects meta‐analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 137-159, January.
    2. Gareth J. Griffith & Tim T. Morris & Matthew J. Tudball & Annie Herbert & Giulia Mancano & Lindsey Pike & Gemma C. Sharp & Jonathan Sterne & Tom M. Palmer & George Davey Smith & Kate Tilling & Luisa Z, 2020. "Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yeojin Chung & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Vincent Dorie & Andrew Gelman & Jingchen Liu, 2013. "A Nondegenerate Penalized Likelihood Estimator for Variance Parameters in Multilevel Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 685-709, October.
    2. Sofia Dias & Alex J. Sutton & Nicky J. Welton & A. E. Ades, 2013. "Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(5), pages 618-640, July.
    3. Amanda Kvarven & Eirik Strømland & Conny Wollbrant & David Andersson & Magnus Johannesson & Gustav Tinghög & Daniel Västfjäll & Kristian Ove R. Myrseth, 2020. "The intuitive cooperation hypothesis revisited: a meta-analytic examination of effect size and between-study heterogeneity," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 26-42, June.
    4. Morris, Tim P & White, Ian R & Pham, Tra My & Quartagno, Matteo, 2023. "How to check a simulation study," OSF Preprints cbr72, Center for Open Science.
    5. Nelson, Jon Paul, 2020. "Fixed-effect versus random-effects meta-analysis in economics: A study of pass-through rates for alcohol beverage excise taxes," Economics Discussion Papers 2020-1, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Ibrahim Y. Tawbe, 2023. "Environmental disclosure programs and birth weight: a meta- analysis," Working Papers 2023-02, CRESE.
    7. Alberto Aiolfi & Emanuele Asti & Emanuele Rausa & Giulia Bonavina & Gianluca Bonitta & Luigi Bonavina, 2018. "Use of C-reactive protein for the early prediction of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Shijie Ren & Jeremy E. Oakley & John W. Stevens, 2018. "Incorporating Genuine Prior Information about Between-Study Heterogeneity in Random Effects Pairwise and Network Meta-analyses," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(4), pages 531-542, May.
    9. Lars G Fritsche & Kisung Nam & Jiacong Du & Ritoban Kundu & Maxwell Salvatore & Xu Shi & Seunggeun Lee & Stephen Burgess & Bhramar Mukherjee, 2023. "Uncovering associations between pre-existing conditions and COVID-19 Severity: A polygenic risk score approach across three large biobanks," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Justin Frake & Andreas Hagemann & Jose Uribe, 2024. "Collider bias in strategy and management research: An illustration using women CEO's effect on other women's career outcomes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(7), pages 1393-1419, July.
    11. repec:osf:metaar:3bnxs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ajaree Rayanakorn & Hooi-Leng Ser & Priyia Pusparajah & Kok-Gan Chan & Bey Hing Goh & Tahir Mehmood Khan & Surasak Saokaew & Shaun Wen Huey Lee & Learn-Han Lee, 2020. "Comparative efficacy of antibiotic(s) alone or in combination of corticosteroids in adults with acute bacterial meningitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, May.
    13. repec:osf:metaar:2bj85_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Tomáš Havránek, 2009. "Rose Effect and the Euro: The Magic is Gone," Working Papers IES 2009/20, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Aug 2009.
    15. Ratko Peric & Zoran Nikolovski & Marco Meucci & Philippe Tadger & Carlo Ferri Marini & Francisco José Amaro-Gahete, 2022. "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Association and Differences between Aerobic Threshold and Point of Optimal Fat Oxidation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Cebiroglu, Gökhan & Hautsch, Nikolaus & Walsh, Christopher, 2019. "Revisiting the stealth trading hypothesis: Does time-varying liquidity explain the size-effect?," CFS Working Paper Series 625, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    17. Richard A Hubner & Richard D Riley & Lucinda J Billingham & Sanjay Popat, 2011. "Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 (ERCC1) Status and Lung Cancer Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies and Recommendations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-10, October.
    18. Ivan Berlin & Daniel Thomas, 2020. "Does Smoking Protect against Being Hospitalized for COVID-19?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-2, December.
    19. Gianmarco Mignogna & Caitlin E. Carey & Robbee Wedow & Nikolas Baya & Mattia Cordioli & Nicola Pirastu & Rino Bellocco & Kathryn Fiuza Malerbi & Michel G. Nivard & Benjamin M. Neale & Raymond K. Walte, 2023. "Patterns of item nonresponse behaviour to survey questionnaires are systematic and associated with genetic loci," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(8), pages 1371-1387, August.
    20. Luisa C Eggenschwiler & Anne W S Rutjes & Sarah N Musy & Dietmar Ausserhofer & Natascha M Nielen & René Schwendimann & Maria Unbeck & Michael Simon, 2022. "Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-24, September.
    21. Bodnar, Olha & Bodnar, Taras, 2025. "Birge ratio method for modeling dark uncertainty in multivariate meta-analyses and inter-laboratory studies," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    22. Schmidli, Heinz & Neuenschwander, Beat & Friede, Tim, 2017. "Meta-analytic-predictive use of historical variance data for the design and analysis of clinical trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 100-110.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0302408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.