IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0297956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding coverage of antenatal care in Palestine: Cross-sectional analysis of Palestinian Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey, 2019–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Masako Horino
  • Salwa Massad
  • Saifuddin Ahmed
  • Khalid Abu Khalid
  • Yehia Abed

Abstract

Introduction: Antenatal care is an essential component of primary healthcare, providing opportunities to screen, prevent, and treat morbidity to preserve the health of mothers and offspring. The World Health Organization now recommends a minimum of eight antenatal care contacts, instead of four, which is challenging in countries exposed to political violence and structural disparities in access to social, economic and healthcare resources as exist in Palestine. This study examines the compliance of the recommend standard of antenatal care in Palestine. Methods: We analyzed data from the UNICEF’s Palestinian Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) 2019–2020. The eligible sample consisted of 2,028 women, 15–49 years of age, living in Palestine, on whom data were available on reported antenatal care services received during the most recent pregnancy within the last two years. Outcome variables of interest were the reported frequencies of antenatal care visits, gestational timing of 1st visit, and services received. Potential risk factors were assessed in women attending less than eight versus eight or more antenatal contacts, as recommended by WHO, by estimating prevalence ratios with 95% Confidence Intervals. Results: Overall, 28% of women did not meet the WHO’s recommendation of eight or more antenatal contacts, varying from 18% in Central West Bank to 33% in South West Bank across the four areas of Palestine (North, Central, and South West Bank and Gaza Strip). Twelve percent of women reported having had no antenatal contacts in the 1st trimester, and these women were two- to three-folds more unlikely to meet WHO recommendation of antenatal contacts than mothers who initiated the antenatal contact in the 1st trimester. Women who had less than eight antenatal contacts were generally poorer, higher in parity, lived in North and South West Bank, sought ANC from either doctor or nurse/midwife only, and initiated antenatal contact in 2nd-to-3rd trimesters. Conclusion: There were considerable socioeconomic and geographic inequalities in the prevalence of not meeting WHO recommended number of antenatal contacts in Palestine, offering the opportunity to inform, improve and continuously reassess coverage of antenatal care.

Suggested Citation

  • Masako Horino & Salwa Massad & Saifuddin Ahmed & Khalid Abu Khalid & Yehia Abed, 2024. "Understanding coverage of antenatal care in Palestine: Cross-sectional analysis of Palestinian Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey, 2019–2020," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0297956
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297956
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0297956&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0297956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward L. Korn & Barry I. Graubard, 1995. "Analysis of Large Health Surveys: Accounting for the Sampling Design," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 158(2), pages 263-295, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Kaestner & Elizabeth Tarlov, 2006. "Changes in the welfare caseload and the health of low-educated mothers," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 623-643.
    2. Nianbo Dong & Elizabeth A. Stuart & David Lenis & Trang Quynh Nguyen, 2020. "Using Propensity Score Analysis of Survey Data to Estimate Population Average Treatment Effects: A Case Study Comparing Different Methods," Evaluation Review, , vol. 44(1), pages 84-108, February.
    3. Barry I. Graubard & Edward L. Korn, 1999. "Predictive Margins with Survey Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 652-659, June.
    4. Michele M. Wood & Dennis S. Mileti & Megumi Kano & Melissa M. Kelley & Rotrease Regan & Linda B. Bourque, 2012. "Communicating Actionable Risk for Terrorism and Other Hazards⋆," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 601-615, April.
    5. Miriam Kesselmeier & Norbert Benda & André Scherag, 2020. "Effect size estimates from umbrella designs: Handling patients with a positive test result for multiple biomarkers using random or pragmatic subtrial allocation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Stanislav Kolenikov, 2010. "Resampling variance estimation for complex survey data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 10(2), pages 165-199, June.
    7. Archer, Kellie J. & Lemeshow, Stanley & Hosmer, David W., 2007. "Goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models when data are collected using a complex sampling design," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4450-4464, May.
    8. repec:mpr:mprres:3373 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Verónica Herrero & Mónica Bocco, 2007. "Comparación de Ponderaciones en Regresiones Probit Simultáneas en un Modelo para la Estimación de la Participación Laboral," Revista de Economía y Estadística, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto de Economía y Finanzas, vol. 45(2), pages 95-124, Diciembre.
    10. D.S. Jang & J.L. Eltinge, "undated". "Evaluation of Descriptive Analyses of Survey Variances and Confidence Interval Widths," Mathematica Policy Research Reports d39db346f92e4012a19f20487, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0297956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.