IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0292805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequality of opportunity in selection procedures limits diversity in higher education: An intersectional study of Dutch selective higher education programs

Author

Listed:
  • Lianne Mulder
  • Eddymurphy U Akwiwu
  • Jos W R Twisk
  • Andries S Koster
  • Jan Hindrik Ravesloot
  • Gerda Croiset
  • Rashmi A Kusurkar
  • Anouk Wouters

Abstract

Selection for higher education (HE) programs may hinder equal opportunities for applicants and thereby reduce student diversity and representativeness. However, variables which could play a role in inequality of opportunity are often studied separately from each other. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study conducts an innovative intersectional analysis of the inequality of opportunity in admissions to selective HE programs. Using a combination of multivariable logistic regression analyses and descriptive statistics, we aimed to investigate 1) the representativeness of student populations of selective HE programs, as compared to both the applicant pool and the demographics of the age cohort; 2) the demographic background variables which are associated with an applicant’s odds of admission; and 3) the intersectional acceptance rates of applicants with all, some or none of the background characteristics positively associated with odds of admission. The study focused on all selective HE programs (n = 96) in The Netherlands in 2019 and 2020, using Studielink applicant data (N = 85,839) and Statistics Netherlands microdata of ten background characteristics. The results show that student diversity in selective HE programs is limited, partly due to the widespread inequality of opportunity in the selection procedures, and partly due to self-selection. Out of all ten variables, migration background was most often (negatively) associated with the odds of receiving an offer of admission. The intersectional analyses provide detailed insight into how (dis)advantage has different effects for different groups. We therefore recommend the implementation of equitable admissions procedures which take intersectionality into account.

Suggested Citation

  • Lianne Mulder & Eddymurphy U Akwiwu & Jos W R Twisk & Andries S Koster & Jan Hindrik Ravesloot & Gerda Croiset & Rashmi A Kusurkar & Anouk Wouters, 2023. "Inequality of opportunity in selection procedures limits diversity in higher education: An intersectional study of Dutch selective higher education programs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(10), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292805
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292805
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292805&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0292805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pmed00:0040296 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kelly Ochs Rosinger & Karly Sarita Ford & Junghee Choi, 2021. "The Role of Selective College Admissions Criteria in Interrupting or Reproducing Racial and Economic Inequities," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 92(1), pages 31-55, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph H. Paris & Catherine Pressimone Beckowski & Sara Fiorot, 2023. "Predicting Success: An Examination of the Predictive Validity of a Measure of Motivational-Developmental Dimensions in College Admissions," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 64(8), pages 1191-1216, December.
    2. Kamis, Rais & Pan, Jessica & Seah, Kelvin KC, 2023. "Do college admissions criteria matter? Evidence from discretionary vs. grade-based admission policies," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Manjunath Patel G C & Likewin Thomas & Mujeebur Rehaman & Praveena R, 2024. "Brainstorming and Fishbone diagram Tools for Enhancing the Student Placement in Technical Education System," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 1436-1454, March.
    4. Heeyun Kim, 2024. "A Fad or the New Norm for Student Access Today? Evaluating Enrollment Outcomes of Holistic Admissions in South Korea," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(5), pages 1040-1064, August.
    5. Finger, Claudia & Solga, Heike, 2023. "Test Participation or Test Performance: Why Do Men Benefit from Test-Based Admission to Higher Education?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 96(4), pages 344-366.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.