IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0291392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are digital social media campaigns the key to raise stroke awareness in low-and middle-income countries? A study of feasibility and cost-effectiveness in Nepal

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Tunkl
  • Raju Paudel
  • Lekhjung Thapa
  • Patrick Tunkl
  • Pankaj Jalan
  • Avinash Chandra
  • Sarah Belson
  • Bikram Prasad Gajurel
  • Nima Haji-Begli
  • Sunanjay Bajaj
  • Jessica Golenia
  • Wolfgang Wick
  • Werner Hacke
  • Christoph Gumbinger

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a major global health problem and was the second leading cause of death worldwide in 2020. However, the lack of public stroke awareness especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Nepal severely hinders the effective provision of stroke care. Efficient and cost-effective strategies to raise stroke awareness in LMICs are still lacking. This study aims to (a) explore the feasibility of a social media-based stroke awareness campaign in Nepal using a cost-benefit analysis and (b) identify best practices for social media health education campaigns. Methods: We performed a stroke awareness campaign over a period of 6 months as part of a Stroke Project in Nepal on four social media platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok) with organic traffic and paid advertisements. Adapted material based on the World Stroke Day Campaign and specifically created videos for TikTok were used. Performance of the campaign was analyzed with established quantitative social media metrics (impressions, reach, engagement, costs). Results: Campaign posts were displayed 7.5 million times to users in Nepal. 2.5 million individual social media users in Nepal were exposed to the campaign on average three times, which equals 8.6% of Nepal’s total population. Of those, 250,000 users actively engaged with the posts. Paid advertisement on Facebook and Instagram proved to be more effective in terms of reach and cost than organic traffic. The total campaign cost was low with a “Cost to reach 1,000 users” of 0.24 EUR and a “Cost Per Click” of 0.01 EUR. Discussion: Social media-based campaigns using paid advertisement provide a feasible and, compared to classical mass medias, a very cost-effective approach to inform large parts of the population about stroke awareness in LMICs. Future research needs to further analyze the impact of social media campaigns on stroke knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Tunkl & Raju Paudel & Lekhjung Thapa & Patrick Tunkl & Pankaj Jalan & Avinash Chandra & Sarah Belson & Bikram Prasad Gajurel & Nima Haji-Begli & Sunanjay Bajaj & Jessica Golenia & Wolfgang W, 2023. "Are digital social media campaigns the key to raise stroke awareness in low-and middle-income countries? A study of feasibility and cost-effectiveness in Nepal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291392
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291392
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291392&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0291392?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bail, C.A., 2016. "Emotional feedback and the viral spread of social media messages about autism spectrum disorders," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(7), pages 1173-1180.
    2. Rutsaert, Pieter & Pieniak, Zuzanna & Regan, Áine & McConnon, Áine & Kuttschreuter, Margôt & Lores, Mònica & Lozano, Natàlia & Guzzon, Antonella & Santare, Dace & Verbeke, Wim, 2014. "Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 84-93.
    3. Michael Stellefson & Samantha R. Paige & Beth H. Chaney & J. Don Chaney, 2020. "Evolving Role of Social Media in Health Promotion: Updated Responsibilities for Health Education Specialists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-7, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Zhu & Xiaowei Wen & May Chu & Gongliang Zhang & Xuefan Liu, 2021. "Consumers’ Food Safety Risk Communication on Social Media Following the Suan Tang Zi Accident: An Extended Protection Motivation Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. W Douglas Evans & Jeffrey B Bingenheimer & Michael Long & Khadidiatou Ndiaye & Dante Donati & Nandan M Rao & Selinam Akaba & Ifeanyi Nsofor & Sohail Agha, 2023. "Outcomes of a social media campaign to promote COVID-19 vaccination in Nigeria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Jiayin Pei & Guang Yu & Xianyun Tian & Maureen Renee Donnelley, 2017. "A new method for early detection of mass concern about public health issues," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 516-532, April.
    4. Pratiwi, Santi & Juerges, Nataly, 2022. "Digital advocacy at the science-policy interface: Resolving land-use conflicts in conservation forests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Mohammad Mulayh Alshammari & Yaser Hasan Al-Mamary & Aliyu Alhaji Abubakar, 2024. "Revolutionizing education: unleashing the power of social media in Saudi Arabian public universities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Zain Jafar & Jonathan D. Quick & Eszter Rimányi & Godfrey Musuka, 2024. "Social Media and Digital Inequity: Reducing Health Inequities by Closing the Digital Divide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(11), pages 1-8, October.
    7. Alberto Michele Felicetti & Antonio Palmiro Volpentesta & Roberto Linzalone & Salvatore Ammirato, 2023. "Information Behaviour of Food Consumers: A Systematic Literature Review and a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Mustafa Emre Civelek & Murat Cemberci & Necati Erdem Eralp, 2016. "The Role of Social Media in Crisis Communication and Crisis Management," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 5(3), pages 111-120, April.
    9. Sarah C. Vos & Jeannette Sutton & Yue Yu & Scott Leo Renshaw & Michele K. Olson & C. Ben Gibson & Carter T. Butts, 2018. "Retweeting Risk Communication: The Role of Threat and Efficacy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(12), pages 2580-2598, December.
    10. Ventura, Vera & Iacus, Stefano & Ceron, Andrea & Curini, Luigi & Frisio, Dario, 2016. "Expo Milano 2015: Legacies in Tweets," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244534, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    11. Maryam Shahbazi & Deborah Bunker & Tania C. Sorrell, 2023. "Communicating shared situational awareness in times of chaos: Social media and the COVID‐19 pandemic," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(10), pages 1185-1202, October.
    12. Matty Demont & Pieter Rutsaert, 2017. "Restructuring the Vietnamese Rice Sector: Towards Increasing Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Nikita V. Polukhin & Tamara R. Nikolic Turnic & Natalia V. Ekkert & Vladimir A. Reshetnikov & Valery V. Royuk & Vera R. Shastina & Mikhail V. Vodolagin, 2023. "The Analysis of the Context of Digital Access to Healthcare in Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Chi-Horng Liao, 2020. "Evaluating the Social Marketing Success Criteria in Health Promotion: A F-DEMATEL Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Yongyou Nie & Jinbu Zhao & Yiyi Zhang & Jizhi Zhou, 2020. "Risk Evaluation of “Not-In-My-Back-Yard” Conflict Potential in Facilities Group: A Case Study of Chemical Park in Xuwei New District, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Michael Stellefson & Samantha R. Paige & Beth H. Chaney & J. Don Chaney, 2020. "Social Media and Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-5, May.
    17. Jingjing Gao & Gabriela A. Gallegos & Joe F. West, 2023. "Public Health Policy, Political Ideology, and Public Emotion Related to COVID-19 in the U.S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(21), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Siobhan Tu’akoi & Malakai Ofanoa & Samuela Ofanoa & Maryann Heather & Hinamaha Lutui & Felicity Goodyear-Smith, 2025. "Exploring How Rheumatic Fever Is Portrayed on TikTok: A Descriptive Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(5), pages 1-11, April.
    19. Steils, Nadia & Obaidalahe, Zakia, 2020. "“Social food”: Food literacy co-construction and distortion on social media," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    20. Carolyn A. Stalgaitis & Susan Dang & Catherine Warner & Sharon Biggers & LaQuanna Jackson & Jeffrey W. Jordan, 2025. "Youth Tobacco Control in the Digital Age: Impact of South Carolina’s Youth Tobacco Education and Vaping Cessation Social Media Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(2), pages 1-20, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.