IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i5p686-d1643001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring How Rheumatic Fever Is Portrayed on TikTok: A Descriptive Content Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Siobhan Tu’akoi

    (Pacific Health Section, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

  • Malakai Ofanoa

    (Pacific Health Section, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

  • Samuela Ofanoa

    (Pacific Health Section, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

  • Maryann Heather

    (Pacific Health Section, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
    Etu Pasifika, Auckland 2104, New Zealand)

  • Hinamaha Lutui

    (Southpoint Family Doctors, Auckland 2104, New Zealand)

  • Felicity Goodyear-Smith

    (Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

Abstract

TikTok is a popular social media platform offering educational opportunities for health issues such as rheumatic fever, which primarily affects 4–19-year-olds globally. This content analysis aimed to explore the type of rheumatic fever content available and popular on TikTok and the role that rheumatic fever representation may play in shaping public understanding and attitudes. The top 100 TikTok video posts under the hashtag #rheumaticfever were examined. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize video metrics and deductive thematic analysis enabled the coding of video content. The majority of TikTok users creating rheumatic fever content were patients or family members of people suffering from rheumatic fever (42%), followed by health professionals (30%). Forty-three percent of videos had negative connotations and personal stories were the most commonly coded type of video (42%). In terms of rheumatic fever content, symptoms ( n = 59), medications/treatment ( n = 37) and disease pathogenesis ( n = 36) were the most common themes. Misinformation was identified in 3% of videos. This study provides a unique insight into who is making rheumatic fever-related content on TikTok and the primarily negative framing of narratives people are exposed to. There are opportunities for future health promotion strategies to focus on the gaps identified in this study, including information on where to seek health services, primordial prevention and stories of recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Siobhan Tu’akoi & Malakai Ofanoa & Samuela Ofanoa & Maryann Heather & Hinamaha Lutui & Felicity Goodyear-Smith, 2025. "Exploring How Rheumatic Fever Is Portrayed on TikTok: A Descriptive Content Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(5), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:686-:d:1643001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/686/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/5/686/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, Anneka & Spray, Julie, 2020. "Beyond awareness: Towards a critically conscious health promotion for rheumatic fever in Aotearoa, New Zealand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Michael Stellefson & Samantha R. Paige & Beth H. Chaney & J. Don Chaney, 2020. "Evolving Role of Social Media in Health Promotion: Updated Responsibilities for Health Education Specialists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-7, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingjing Gao & Gabriela A. Gallegos & Joe F. West, 2023. "Public Health Policy, Political Ideology, and Public Emotion Related to COVID-19 in the U.S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Haynes, Emma & Walker, Roz & Mitchell, Alice G. & Katzenellenbogen, Judy & D'Antoine, Heather & Bessarab, Dawn, 2021. "Decolonizing Indigenous health: Generating a productive dialogue to eliminate Rheumatic Heart Disease in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    3. Mohammad Mulayh Alshammari & Yaser Hasan Al-Mamary & Aliyu Alhaji Abubakar, 2024. "Revolutionizing education: unleashing the power of social media in Saudi Arabian public universities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Zain Jafar & Jonathan D. Quick & Eszter Rimányi & Godfrey Musuka, 2024. "Social Media and Digital Inequity: Reducing Health Inequities by Closing the Digital Divide," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(11), pages 1-8, October.
    5. Carolyn A. Stalgaitis & Susan Dang & Catherine Warner & Sharon Biggers & LaQuanna Jackson & Jeffrey W. Jordan, 2025. "Youth Tobacco Control in the Digital Age: Impact of South Carolina’s Youth Tobacco Education and Vaping Cessation Social Media Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(2), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Beniamino Schiavone & Andrea Vitale & Mena Gallo & Gianlucasalvatore Russo & Domenico Ponticelli & Mario Borrelli, 2021. "Overview of Facebook Use by Hospitals in Italy: A Nationwide Survey during the COVID-19 Emergency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Xiwu Xu & Yaodong Zhou & Dai Su & Yuan Dang & Xianwen Zhang, 2023. "Does Education Influence Life-Course Depression in Middle-Aged and Elderly in China? Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Joanna Albrecht & Anna Lea Stark & Eleana Dongas & Kamil J. Wrona & Christoph Dockweiler, 2022. "Hosting an Online World Café to Develop an Understanding of Digital Health Promoting Settings from a Citizen’s Perspective—Methodological Potentials and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Krzysztof Płaciszewski & Waldemar Wierzba & Janusz Ostrowski & Jarosław Pinkas & Mateusz Jankowski, 2022. "Use of the Internet for Health Purposes—A National Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey among Adults in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Anabel Ramos-Pla & Laura Fornons Casol, 2025. "Health Education in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Gary L. Kreps, 2021. "Health Advocacy and Health Communication for Elderly Health Care Consumers: Rationale, Demand, and Policy Implications," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(2), pages 113-138, March.
    12. Emma Haynes & Minitja Marawili & Alice Mitchell & Roz Walker & Judith Katzenellenbogen & Dawn Bessarab, 2022. "“Weaving a Mat That We Can All Sit On”: Qualitative Research Approaches for Productive Dialogue in the Intercultural Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Maryam Shahbazi & Deborah Bunker & Tania C. Sorrell, 2023. "Communicating shared situational awareness in times of chaos: Social media and the COVID‐19 pandemic," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(10), pages 1185-1202, October.
    14. Nikita V. Polukhin & Tamara R. Nikolic Turnic & Natalia V. Ekkert & Vladimir A. Reshetnikov & Valery V. Royuk & Vera R. Shastina & Mikhail V. Vodolagin, 2023. "The Analysis of the Context of Digital Access to Healthcare in Russia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Kevin K. C. Hung & Makiko K. MacDermot & Emily Y. Y. Chan & Sida Liu & Zhe Huang & Chi S. Wong & Joseph H. Walline & Colin A. Graham, 2021. "CCOUC Ethnic Minority Health Project: A Case Study for Health EDRM Initiatives to Improve Disaster Preparedness in a Rural Chinese Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-14, May.
    16. Chi-Horng Liao, 2020. "Evaluating the Social Marketing Success Criteria in Health Promotion: A F-DEMATEL Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Michael Stellefson & Samantha R. Paige & Beth H. Chaney & J. Don Chaney, 2020. "Social Media and Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-5, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:5:p:686-:d:1643001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.