IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0290370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost hierarchies and the pattern of product cost cross-subsidization: Extending a computational model of costing system design

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Schmidt
  • Kai Gustav Mertens
  • Matthias Meyer

Abstract

Cost information is critical to ease managers’ decisions in daily business, but its provision is informationally demanding and error prone. Effective design choices for costing systems that can reduce errors are the subject of a growing body of research. The computational model by Anand, Balakrishnan, and Labro (2019) collates previous research in a unifying framework, turning it into a potential standard for future studies. This paper uses this framework and aims to investigate the mechanism behind the well-documented empirical pattern of product cost cross-subsidization in a large-scale simulation experiment. According to this pattern, volume-based costing systems bias the costs of high-volume products upward and of low-volume products downward. Although this pattern has important implications for firms and is discussed extensively in the literature, it has not yet been investigated with computational models. As the first objective of this paper, we replicate the original model by following a pattern-oriented model replication approach. The second objective is to study the mechanism behind the pattern of product cost cross-subsidization. We are unable to reproduce it systematically with the original model. However, the pattern emerges when we extend the model to include a simple cost hierarchy with distinct resource consumption types and volume-based cost drivers. This allows us to specify the likely mechanism behind it. Building on these results, we further extend the model with empirical and theory-based ABC cost hierarchies and assess their effect on product cost cross-subsidization. Our results suggest that production environments underpin more diverse cost hierarchies in practice than previously implemented in the model. Overall, we argue that our extension provides relevant insights into the pattern of product cost cross-subsidization, while our replication and extension strengthen the models’ credibility and usability for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Schmidt & Kai Gustav Mertens & Matthias Meyer, 2023. "Cost hierarchies and the pattern of product cost cross-subsidization: Extending a computational model of costing system design," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290370
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290370
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290370&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0290370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramji Balakrishnan & Stephen Hansen & Eva Labro, 2011. "Evaluating Heuristics Used When Designing Product Costing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 520-541, March.
    2. Anderson, Shannon W. & Hesford, James W. & Young, S. Mark, 2002. "Factors influencing the performance of activity based costing teams: a field study of ABC model development time in the automobile industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 195-211, April.
    3. Malmi, Teemu, 1999. "Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 649-672, November.
    4. Bernd-O. Heine & Matthias Meyer & Oliver Strangfeld, 2005. "Stylised Facts and the Contribution of Simulation to the Economic Analysis of Budgeting," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 8(4), pages 1-4.
    5. Uri Wilensky & William Rand, 2007. "Making Models Match: Replicating an Agent-Based Model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 10(4), pages 1-2.
    6. Eva Labro & Mario Vanhoucke, 2008. "Diversity in Resource Consumption Patterns and Robustness of Costing Systems to Errors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(10), pages 1715-1730, October.
    7. Iris Lorscheid & Bernd-Oliver Heine & Matthias Meyer, 2012. "Opening the ‘black box’ of simulations: increased transparency and effective communication through the systematic design of experiments," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 22-62, March.
    8. C. Homburg & Julia Nasev & Philipp Plank, 2018. "The impact of cost allocation errors on price and product-mix decisions," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 497-527, August.
    9. Gosselin, Maurice, 1997. "The effect of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of activity-based costing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 105-122, February.
    10. Christopher D. Ittner & William N. Lanen & David F. Larcker, 2002. "The Association Between Activity‐Based Costing and Manufacturing Performance," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 711-726, June.
    11. Drury, Colin & Tayles, Mike, 2005. "Explicating the design of overhead absorption procedures in UK organizations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 47-84.
    12. Evdokia I. Tsifora & Prodromos D. Chatzoglou, 2016. "Exploring the effects of firm and product characteristics on cost system’s features," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 93-116.
    13. Rong‐Ruey Duh & Thomas W. Lin & Wen‐Ying Wang & Chao‐Hsin Huang, 2009. "The design and implementation of activity‐based costing," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 27-52, June.
    14. Rong‐Ruey Duh & Thomas W. Lin & Wen‐Ying Wang & Chao‐Hsin Huang, 2009. "The design and implementation of activity‐based costing," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 27-52, June.
    15. Vic Anand & Ramji Balakrishnan & Eva Labro, 2017. "Obtaining Informationally Consistent Decisions When Computing Costs with Limited Information," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(2), pages 211-230, February.
    16. Colin Drury & Mike Tayles, 1994. "Product costing in UK manufacturing organizations," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 443-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthias Meyer & Mark Schmidt, 2025. "Robust design heuristics for product costing systems: a replication and extension using an ABC cost hierarchy," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 197-235, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Meyer & Mark Schmidt, 2025. "Robust design heuristics for product costing systems: a replication and extension using an ABC cost hierarchy," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 95(2), pages 197-235, April.
    2. Cinquini, Lino & Collini, Paolo & Marelli, Alessandro & Tenucci, Andrea, 2008. "An exploration of the factors affecting the diffusion of Advanced Costing techniques: a comparative analysis of two surveys (1996-2005)," MPRA Paper 10911, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Lino Cinquini & Paolo Collini & Alessandro Marelli & Andrea Tenucci, 2015. "Change in the relevance of cost information and costing systems: evidence from two Italian surveys," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(3), pages 557-587, August.
    4. Lino Cinquini & Paolo Collini & Alessandro Marelli & Andrea Tenucci, 2008. "An exploration of the factors affecting the diffusion of advanced costing techniques: a comparative analysis of two surveys (1996-2005)," Working Papers 200801, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna of Pisa, Istituto di Management.
    5. Simon Alcouffe & Pierre Mévellec, 2012. "Analyse de la littérature sur l'ABC et proposition d'une taxinomie," Post-Print hal-00936600, HAL.
    6. Schoute, Martijn, 2011. "The relationship between product diversity, usage of advanced manufacturing technologies and activity-based costing adoption," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 120-134.
    7. Hadid, Wael & Hamdan, Mohammed, 2022. "Firm size and cost system sophistication: The role of firm age," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(2).
    8. Simon Alcouffe & Jonathan Maurice & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gate, 2019. "Is the limited diffusion of management accounting innovations really a paradox? A meta-analysis of the relationship between product diversity and the adoption of Activity-Based Costing [La faible d," Post-Print hal-02124677, HAL.
    9. Al-Sayed, Mahmoud & Dugdale, David, 2016. "Activity-based innovations in the UK manufacturing sector: Extent, adoption process patterns and contingency factors," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 38-58.
    10. Hanen Moalla, 2006. "La diffusion de la méthode ABC en Tunisie," Post-Print halshs-00548107, HAL.
    11. Rodney Coyte & Martin Messner & Shan Zhou, 2022. "The revival of zero‐based budgeting: drivers and consequences of firm‐level adoptions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3147-3188, September.
    12. Jana Pokorná, 2016. "Impact of Activity-Based Costing on Financial Performance in the Czech Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(2), pages 643-652.
    13. Alcouffe, Simon & Galy, Nadine & Gaté, Loïc, 2016. "Une méta-analyse qualitative de la littérature sur les déterminants de l'adoption de l'activity-based costing [A meta-analysis of the literature on the determinants of the adoption of activity-base," MPRA Paper 73381, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Maria-Victòria Sánchez-Rebull & Angels Niñerola & Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara, 2023. "After 30 Years, What Has Happened to Activity-Based Costing? A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    15. Simon Alcouffe & Nadine Galy & Loïc Gaté, 2016. "Une méta-analyse qualitative de la littérature sur les déterminants de l'adoption de l'Activity-Based Costing (méthode ABC)," Post-Print hal-01900677, HAL.
    16. Maiga, Adam S. & Nilsson, Anders & Jacobs, Fred A., 2014. "Assessing the interaction effect of cost control systems and information technology integration on manufacturing plant financial performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 77-90.
    17. Askarany, Davood & Yazdifar, Hassan, 2012. "An investigation into the mixed reported adoption rates for ABC: Evidence from Australia, New Zealand and the UK," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 430-439.
    18. Lukka, Kari & Granlund, Markus, 2002. "The fragmented communication structure within the accounting academia: the case of activity-based costing research genres," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1-2), pages 165-190.
    19. Eva Labro, 2015. "Using simulation methods in accounting research," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 99-104, August.
    20. Drury, Colin & Tayles, Mike, 2005. "Explicating the design of overhead absorption procedures in UK organizations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 47-84.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0290370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.