IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0283508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How loan descriptions affect the likelihood that borrowers obtain loans in P2P networks? -An empirical analysis based on the "Renrendai" platform

Author

Listed:
  • Qiao Sun
  • Jigan Wang
  • Hao Zhang
  • Ting Wen

Abstract

Information asymmetry is widespread in the P2P online lending market, creating an imbalance in the position of lenders and borrowers. This paper aims to expand the process of information exchange between lenders and borrowers by analyzing the link between soft information such as borrowers’ loan descriptions and lending outcomes. Based on the transaction data of the ‘Renrendai’ platform, this paper analyzed the linguistic features and extracted the content of loan descriptions using a latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) theme model. To further explore the value of loan descriptions in predicting lending success, this paper conducts a prediction study based on a support vector machine model. It is found that: lenders focus on effective information in the loan descriptions, the linguistic complexity affects the transaction, with simple and direct statements being more favorable; the content for building a good personal image of the borrower will significantly contribute to the lending success. In the prediction study section, it is demonstrated that loan descriptions’ language feature indicators can improve prediction accuracy. This paper uncovers the importance of loan descriptions in online lending transactions, which has implications in assisting lenders’ investment judgments, as well as in platform information system improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiao Sun & Jigan Wang & Hao Zhang & Ting Wen, 2023. "How loan descriptions affect the likelihood that borrowers obtain loans in P2P networks? -An empirical analysis based on the "Renrendai" platform," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0283508
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283508
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0283508
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0283508&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0283508?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim Loughran & Bill Mcdonald, 2014. "Measuring Readability in Financial Disclosures," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(4), pages 1643-1671, August.
    2. Junhui Xu & Jitka Hilliard & James R. Barth, 2020. "On Education Level and Terms in Obtaining P2P Funding: New Evidence from China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 801-826, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan Luo & Linying Zhou, 2020. "Textual tone in corporate financial disclosures: a survey of the literature," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 17(2), pages 101-110, September.
    2. Qian Wang & Duowen Wu & Lina Yan, 2021. "Effect of positive tone in MD&A disclosure on capital structure adjustment speed: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5809-5845, December.
    3. Drago, Carlo & Ginesti, Gianluca & Pongelli, Claudia & Sciascia, Salvatore, 2018. "Reporting strategies: What makes family firms beat around the bush? Family-related antecedents of annual report readability," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 142-150.
    4. Ruiyi Zhao & Ling Li, 2024. "Does digitalization always benefit cultural, sports, and tourism enterprises quality? Unveiling the inverted U-shaped relationship from a resource and capability perspective," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Samuel B. Bonsall & Brian P. Miller, 2017. "The impact of narrative disclosure readability on bond ratings and the cost of debt," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 608-643, June.
    6. Goldman, Eitan & Martel, Jordan & Schneemeier, Jan, 2022. "A theory of financial media," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 239-258.
    7. Kristian D. Allee & Theodore E. Christensen & Bryan S. Graden & Kenneth J. Merkley, 2021. "The Genesis of Voluntary Disclosure: An Analysis of Firms’ First Earnings Guidance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1914-1938, March.
    8. Li, Frank Weikai & Sun, Chengzhu, 2022. "Information acquisition and expected returns: Evidence from EDGAR search traffic," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Shams, Syed & Bose, Sudipta & Sheikhbahaei, Ali, 2024. "Pricing media sentiment: Evidence from global mergers and acquisitions," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    10. Xiaohua Bao & Hailiang Huang & Larry D Qiu & Xiaozhuo Wang, 2022. "Exchange rate expectations and exports: Firm-level evidence from China," Discussion Papers 2022-07, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    11. Dongshin Kim & Dongkuk Lim & Jonathan A. Wiley, 2023. "Narrative Investment-Risk Disclosure & REIT Investment," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 542-567, February.
    12. Liu, Baohua & Huang, Dan & Chen, Tao & Chan, Kam C., 2023. "Mandatory R&D disclosure and analyst forecast Accuracy: Evidence from an emerging market," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    13. Bui, Dien Giau & Chen, Yehning & Chen, Yan-Shing & Lin, Chih-Yung, 2023. "Managerial ability and financial statement disaggregation decisions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Stephen P. Ferris & Jan Hanousek, Jr. & Jan Hanousek & Jolana Stejskalová, 2025. "The Power of the Crowd: Retail Investors and the Cost of Capital," MENDELU Working Papers in Business and Economics 2025-105, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    15. John M. Barrios, 2022. "Occupational Licensing and Accountant Quality: Evidence from the 150‐Hour Rule," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 3-43, March.
    16. Souad Lajili Jarjir & Martin Lebelle & Syrine Sassi, 2022. "The effect of issuance documentation disclosure and readability on liquidity: Evidence from green bonds," Post-Print hal-03428710, HAL.
    17. Dyer, Travis & Lang, Mark & Stice-Lawrence, Lorien, 2016. "Do managers really guide through the fog? On the challenges in assessing the causes of voluntary disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 270-276.
    18. Stephen J. Smulowitz & Didier Cossin & Hongze Lu, 2023. "Managerial Short-Termism and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Role of External Monitoring," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 759-778, December.
    19. Jiayi Zheng, 2024. "Institutional attention and investment efficiency," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(4), pages 3241-3273, December.
    20. Chen, Chen & Hanlon, Dean & Khedmati, Mehdi & Wake, James, 2023. "Annual report readability and equity mispricing," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0283508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.