IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0282668.html

Optimizing facility location, sizing, and growth time for a cultivated resource: A case study in coral aquaculture

Author

Listed:
  • Ryu B Lippmann
  • Kate J Helmstedt
  • Mark T Gibbs
  • Paul Corry

Abstract

Production of cultivated resources require additional planning that takes growth time into account. We formulate a mathematical programming model to determine the optimal location and sizing of growth facilities, impacted by resource survival rate as a function of its growth time. Our method informs strategic decisions regarding the number, location, and sizing of facilities, as well as operational decisions of optimal growth time for a cultivated resource in a facility to minimize total costs. We solve this facility location and sizing problem in the context of coral aquaculture for large-scale reef restoration using a two-stage algorithm and a linear mixed-integer solver. We assess growth time in a facility in terms of its impact on survival (post-deployment) considering growth quantity requirements and growth facility production constraints. We explore the sensitivity of optimal facility number, location, and sizing to changes in the geographic distribution of demand and cost parameters computationally. Results show that the relationship between growth time and survival is critical to optimizing operational decisions for grown resources. These results inform the value of data certainty to optimize the logistics of coral aquaculture production.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryu B Lippmann & Kate J Helmstedt & Mark T Gibbs & Paul Corry, 2023. "Optimizing facility location, sizing, and growth time for a cultivated resource: A case study in coral aquaculture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282668
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282668
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282668&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0282668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vedat Verter & M. Cemal Dincer, 1995. "Facility location and capacity acquisition: An integrated approach," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(8), pages 1141-1160, December.
    2. Owen, Susan Hesse & Daskin, Mark S., 1998. "Strategic facility location: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(3), pages 423-447, December.
    3. Sanjay Dominik Jena & Jean-François Cordeau & Bernard Gendron, 2015. "Dynamic Facility Location with Generalized Modular Capacities," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 484-499, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silva, Allyson & Aloise, Daniel & Coelho, Leandro C. & Rocha, Caroline, 2021. "Heuristics for the dynamic facility location problem with modular capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 435-452.
    2. Correia, Isabel & Melo, Teresa, 2016. "A computational comparison of formulations for a multi-period facility location problem with modular capacity adjustments and flexible demand fulfillment," Technical Reports on Logistics of the Saarland Business School 11, Saarland University of Applied Sciences (htw saar), Saarland Business School.
    3. Clavijo López, Christian & Crama, Yves & Pironet, Thierry & Semet, Frédéric, 2024. "Multi-period distribution networks with purchase commitment contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 556-572.
    4. Šárka Štádlerová & Sanjay Dominik Jena & Peter Schütz, 2023. "Using Lagrangian relaxation to locate hydrogen production facilities under uncertain demand: a case study from Norway," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-32, December.
    5. Šárka Štádlerová & Peter Schütz & Ivar Refsdal & Tobias Spinnangr Sindre & František Kolovský, 2026. "Solving a multi-horizon stochastic facility location problem with capacity expansion," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-36, June.
    6. Marković, Nikola & Ryzhov, Ilya O. & Schonfeld, Paul, 2017. "Evasive flow capture: A multi-period stochastic facility location problem with independent demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 687-703.
    7. Allman, Andrew & Zhang, Qi, 2020. "Dynamic location of modular manufacturing facilities with relocation of individual modules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 494-507.
    8. Becker, Tristan & Lier, Stefan & Werners, Brigitte, 2019. "Value of modular production concepts in future chemical industry production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 957-970.
    9. Alfandari, Laurent, 2004. "Choice Rules with Size Constraints for Multiple Criteria Decision Making," ESSEC Working Papers DR 04002, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    10. Sarhadi, Hassan & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Verma, Manish, 2020. "A robust optimization approach to locating and stockpiling marine oil-spill response facilities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Sauvey, Christophe & Melo, Teresa & Correia, Isabel, 2019. "Two-phase heuristics for a multi-period capacitated facility location problem with service-differentiated customers," Technical Reports on Logistics of the Saarland Business School 16, Saarland University of Applied Sciences (htw saar), Saarland Business School.
    12. Tang, Lianhua & Li, Yantong & Bai, Danyu & Liu, Tao & Coelho, Leandro C., 2022. "Bi-objective optimization for a multi-period COVID-19 vaccination planning problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. García Cáceres, Rafael Guillermo & Aráoz Durand, Julián Arturo & Gómez, Fernando Palacios, 2009. "Integral analysis method - IAM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 891-903, February.
    14. Srinivas, Sharan & Ramachandiran, Surya & Rajendran, Suchithra, 2022. "Autonomous robot-driven deliveries: A review of recent developments and future directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    15. Warley Almeida Silva & Margarida Carvalho & Sanjay Dominik Jena, 2026. "Dynamic Facility Location Under Cumulative Customer Demand," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 46-63, January.
    16. Stephanie A. Snyder & Robert G. Haight, 2016. "Application of the Maximal Covering Location Problem to Habitat Reserve Site Selection," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 39(1), pages 28-47, January.
    17. Gang Chen & Mark S. Daskin & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen & Stanislav Uryasev, 2006. "The α‐reliable mean‐excess regret model for stochastic facility location modeling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(7), pages 617-626, October.
    18. Emde, Simon & Boysen, Nils, 2012. "Optimally locating in-house logistics areas to facilitate JIT-supply of mixed-model assembly lines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 393-402.
    19. Laijun Zhao & Huiyong Li & Yan Sun & Rongbing Huang & Qingmi Hu & Jiajia Wang & Fei Gao, 2017. "Planning Emergency Shelters for Urban Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Location-Allocation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Jiarong Chen & Jungwook Lee & Hyangsook Lee, 2025. "A Study on the Site Selection of Urban Logistics Centers Utilizing Public Infrastructure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.