IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0282251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practice environment determinants of job satisfaction among midwives at healthcare facilities in Accra Metropolis: A multicentre study

Author

Listed:
  • Dorothy Akua Aikins
  • Collins Atta Poku
  • Ernestina Donkor
  • Florence Naab

Abstract

Introduction: Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3) has been one of the key goals for all partners of health globally. The health workforce especially midwives are among the principal skilled experts for achieving the goal. This is evidenced in the role they play in caring for pregnant women from the antenatal stages to the postpartum periods. However, very little has been reported about midwives’ job satisfaction in Ghana. The study assessed the practice environment determinants of job satisfaction among registered midwives in Ghana. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional design was adopted to recruit midwives from public and quasi-government hospitals in Accra Metropolis. Validated scales—‘Measure of Job Satisfaction’ and ‘Practice Environment Scale of Nursing Work Index’ were used for data collection. Data was analysed through descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation and linear regression. Results: Midwives had a positive perception of their work environment. They were generally satisfied with their job but were dissatisfied with their salaries. Key determinants of midwives’ job satisfaction included years of work as a midwife, managers’ leadership and support, and adequacy of human and material resources. Conclusion: Improving midwives’ job satisfaction through enabling the work environment will go a long way to improve healthcare provision in the healthcare delivery points in helping achieve SDG 3.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorothy Akua Aikins & Collins Atta Poku & Ernestina Donkor & Florence Naab, 2023. "Practice environment determinants of job satisfaction among midwives at healthcare facilities in Accra Metropolis: A multicentre study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282251
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282251
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0282251&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0282251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0282251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.